Friend,

During yesterday's marathon Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Amy Coney Barrett was asked a pretty softball question about climate change:

"Have you read about that?"

Her response:

"I'm certainly not a scientist...I have read things about climate change. I would not say I have firm views on it."

That answer alone is disqualifying. And here's why: While it's not a requirement that a Supreme Court justice be a scientist, it is a requirement that a justice be able to review evidence to make a decision. The scientific evidence of climate change is beyond reasonable doubt or debate. A nominee without "firm views" on climate science should be firmly viewed as unqualified for the Supreme Court.

The tens of millions of Americans who are already suffering today from the effects of climate-fueled wildfires and hurricanes cannot afford a climate denier on the Supreme Court. On behalf of them and the millions more who will feel climate change's effects in the coming years, watch and then share Amy Coney Barrett's disqualifying response with your community today:

SHARE ON TWITTER: [link removed]

SHARE ON FACEBOOK: [link removed]

Thank you,

Rainee Taylor
Digital Strategist, Evergreen Action


This email was sent to [email protected]. Click here to unsubscribe: [link removed]

Contributions or gifts to EVERGREEN ACTION are not tax deductible. All content (c) 2020 EVERGREEN ACTION, All Rights Reserved

Privacy Policy: [link removed]

PAID FOR BY EVERGREEN ACTION (D)