From Tradivore <[email protected]>
Subject What the Mainstream Media Gets Wrong About IPO Investing || Sep 10, 2026
Date September 10, 2026 10:48 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
What if everything the mainstream media told you about investing in IPOs is
complete, utter nonsense? What if chasing the biggest names… like OpenAI, and
Anthropic… isn’t the best way to profit? Click here and I’ll show you a hidden
way to position yourself for OpenAI and Anthropic’s upcoming IPOs.




Сⅼіϲk hеrе. <[link removed]>
<[link removed]>





Editor’s Note: What if you could claim a stake in both OpenAI and Anthropic’s
IPOs… with just $200? What if I said you don’t even have to wait for them to go
public?Click here to see the details
<[link removed]>
from former IPO insider Jason Bodner — the man who spent nearly two decades
helping IPOs go-to-market.


What if everything the mainstream media told you about investing in IPOs is
complete, utter nonsense?

What if chasing the biggest names… like OpenAI, and Anthropic… isn’t the best
way to profit?

Click here
<[link removed]>
and I’ll show you a hidden way to position yourself for OpenAI and Anthropic’s
upcoming IPOs.

It’s an obscure group of companies known as “IPO Multipliers.”

These overlooked companies have historically outperformed the blockbuster
IPOs every single time.

Producing gains that can completely transform a portfolio.

Just to give you an idea…

One “IPO Multiplier” I recommended was able to turn his $5,350 stake into a
$410,300 retirement nest egg.

I’ve found three of these special companies today…

I’ll tell you more about them in this urgent video.
<[link removed]>

Of course, gains like this are uncommon, but they demonstrate what’s possible
when investors look beyond the headlines.

And get this…

The upcoming wave of AI IPOs is estimated to be worth over $4 trillion…

Making it the biggest tech IPO wave of all time.

So I wouldn’t be surprised if the wins this time around are even bigger.

Click here to get the details on my three favorite IPO Multipliers that could
soar in the coming weeks.
<[link removed]>

Regards,

Jason Bodner
Founder, Outlier Alpha

If you would like to stop receiving these offers, please click here
<[link removed]>
to unsubscribe.






DAILY BRIEF CENSUS / REPRESENTATION



TRUMP ADMINISTRATION PROPOSES EXCLUDING IMMIGRANTS FROM 2030 CENSUS,
RESHAPING HOUSE APPORTIONMENT


PROPOSED APPORTIONMENT RULE
WHO WOULD COUNT FOR HOUSE APPORTIONMENT
INCLUDED U.S. citizens
Lawful permanent residents EXCLUDED Undocumented immigrants
Nonpermanent legal statuses
The Trump administration proposed a sweeping overhaul of the U.S. census on
Wednesday that would exclude undocumented immigrants and other noncitizens
lacking permanent legal status from the population counts used to apportion
House seats after the 2030 census. The proposed rule, submitted by the Commerce
Department and set to be published in the Federal Register, argues that the
Constitution's requirement to count the "whole number of persons" in each state
was never meant to include people the administration describes as lacking a
sufficient "tie and allegiance" to the country.

“ “whole number of persons in each State” CONSTITUTIONAL APPORTIONMENT
LANGUAGE
The change marks a sharp break from historical census practice. The 1790
Census Act instructed enumerators to determine residence based on a person's
"usual place of abode," and modern census rules have counted foreign citizens
living in the United States at the place where they live and sleep most of the
time, without distinguishing between lawful and unlawful immigration status for
apportionment. Under the new proposal, lawful permanent residents would remain
in the apportionment base, while undocumented immigrants and foreign citizens
whose legal status is less durable than permanent residency would be excluded.

1790 FIRST CENSUS ACT The concept of “usual residence” has guided the
census since the first federal enumeration.

WHY THE COUNT MATTERS
Population count → 435 House seats → State representation
The proposal would also increase the Census Bureau's use of administrative
records to determine an individual's legal status. The agency says its
available records include information from the Department of Homeland Security,
Treasury Department, Department of State, Health and Human Services, Postal
Service, state and local governments, and other sources. The Census Bureau is
also considering adding a legal-status question to the short-form decennial
questionnaire.

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS The proposal contemplates using federal records to
help determine whether a noncitizen has the type of legal status required for
inclusion in the apportionment base.
DHS Treasury State / other records

A SECOND PROPOSED CHANGE
Separately, the proposed rule would prohibit questions about race and
ethnicity or sexual orientation on the short-form decennial census
questionnaire and other questionnaires used for the population enumeration. The
Census Bureau cites privacy, response burden and "substantial doubts" about the
continued usefulness and meaning of some demographic classifications. The
restriction would not apply to the American Community Survey or prevent the
Census Bureau from obtaining demographic information through administrative
records and other sources.

DECENNIAL SHORT FORM Race & ethnicity questions proposed for removal NOT
COVERED BY THIS RESTRICTION American Community Survey
Because census population data determine the allocation of seats in the House
and provide the foundation for congressional and legislative redistricting, the
proposal could have significant political consequences after the 2030 count.
Census data are also widely used in federal funding formulas and government
planning, although the proposed residence rule specifically addresses which
people would be included in the population base used for congressional
apportionment. The proposal is expected to face legal challenges and
congressional scrutiny, echoing the court fight over the administration's
attempt during Trump's first term to exclude undocumented immigrants from the
2020 apportionment count.

03 WHAT MATTERS Three elements of the proposed overhaul

01 The proposal would keep lawful permanent residents in the apportionment
base but exclude undocumented immigrants and other foreign citizens whose legal
status is considered less durable than permanent residency.

02 The Census Bureau is considering extensive use of administrative records
to determine legal status and is also inviting public comment on whether to
include a legal-status question on the decennial short form.

03 A separate portion of the proposal would remove race and ethnicity
questions from the decennial enumeration questionnaire, while leaving the
Census Bureau free to collect such information through the American Community
Survey and administrative records.


SOURCES Census Overhaul Proposed by Trump Administration Could Reshape
Congress — Roll Call
Decennial Census of the Population of Americans; Proposed Residence Criteria
and Proposed Regulations for Demographic Questions — U.S. Census Bureau /
Federal Register
Trump Administration Proposes Excluding Huge Swath of Immigrants From U.S.
Census — Reuters




<[link removed]>



[email protected] is on <[link removed]>
<[link removed]>Tradivore.com <[link removed]> list because you
opted in before the crowd caught on.

If we go quiet — look in promotions, updates, or wherever your inbox files
things it hasn't figured out yet.

Unsubscribe
<[link removed]>
. We'll part ways cleanly.

If something's off, you can reach us here <mailto:[email protected]>

254 Chapman Rd Ste 208 Newark, Delaware 19702.




UNSUBSCRIBE
<[link removed]>
|PRIVACY POLICY <[link removed]>




© 2026 Alpha One Marketers LLC. All rights reserved.

Message Analysis