It pays out income every single Thursday
Trader Insight Media
<> Sep 2, 2026
A portfolio, like a team, wins through collaboration! - Andrew Green
Tim Plaehn here.
CrowdStrike… Palantir... Nvidia…
Some of the most powerful companies on the planet and not one of them pays a
real dividend.
So while everyone around me was piling into the AI trade, chasing gains and
holding their breath... I sat it out.
Until I found something that changed everything…
A single fund that owns all the biggest names in AI and pays out income every
single Thursday.
Up to $1,051 a month.
What I found is the most compelling income opportunity I've seen in two
decades of doing this.
I reveal the full story in a free video presentation…
Including the real Thursday's distribution history…
How the fund actually generates this income…
And how to buy it in any brokerage account.
Watch the free presentation here.
<[link removed]>
But hurry: the next payout is this Thursday.
To your income,
Tim Plaehn
Chief Income Strategist
Investors Alley
Information contained in this email and websites maintained by Magnifi
Communities LLC (dba Investors Alley) are for educational purposes only and are
neither an offer nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Trading and
investing involve risk, and you may lose your principal investment.
All information contained herein is copyright 2025, Magnifi Communities LLC.
2026-08-03 23:21:43 +00:00 IMG2493_2 - 02.09 (2) 19674173 25796428 82167
102067 [2456768, 2496889, 10956657]
Today's Market Update For You
Trump Says 'Let Data Reign.' Warren Says Families Will Pay For It.
Written by Andrew Green
Trump Says 'Let Data Reign.' Warren Says Families Will Pay For It. - Quick Take
The Quick Take President Trump urged communities to embrace AI data centers,
posting that doing so would bring "far lower taxes and jobs all over the
place," adding "let Data Reign." Senator Elizabeth Warren countered that
families shouldn't have to "pay higher electricity bills so trillion-dollar
tech companies can build their AI empires." US residential electricity prices
rose nearly 5% in 2026, with the steepest increases hitting East Coast regions
absorbing the most new data-center load. Utility stocks with heavy data-center
exposure moved higher Tuesday, with Constellation Energy up about 2.0% and
Vistra up about 0.5%.
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company now owns rights to a tech that could save the entire
public power grid from collapse. And billionaire Sam Altman is now an investor.
Click here to learn this company's name for free.
<[link removed]>
(ad: Altimetry)
Trump Says 'Let Data Reign.' Warren Says Families Will Pay For It. - Body
What Happened
A Public Fight Over Who Pays for AI's Power Bill
President Trump posted that communities should welcome AI data centers for the
jobs and tax revenue they bring, writing that embracing them would mean "far
lower taxes and jobs all over the place," and closing with "let Data Reign."
Senator Elizabeth Warren responded directly, saying families should not have to
"pay higher electricity bills so trillion-dollar tech companies can build their
AI empires." Vice President JD Vance, breaking somewhat from the
administration's simpler build-it framing, acknowledged that "probably 99% of
the backlash to data centers has come in areas where building a data center
means higher utility and higher electricity for the people on the ground." The
exchange played out largely in public statements and social media posts rather
than through any formal policy proposal, which is typical of how this fight has
unfolded over the past several months.
The mechanics behind the fight are straightforward. Data centers draw
enormous, steady electricity loads, and utilities often need new transmission
lines and generation capacity to serve them. Depending on how a state's
regulators structure the cost allocation, some or all of that new
infrastructure cost gets spread across the broader ratepayer base rather than
billed narrowly to the data-center operator. That cost-allocation mechanism,
more than any single company's electricity use, is the concrete link behind the
"families will pay" argument. Utilities in several states have already asked
regulators for permission to build new capacity specifically to serve
data-center customers, which is precisely the kind of request that puts
cost-allocation questions in front of a commission rather than leaving them as
an abstract policy debate.
National data lends some weight to the concern without settling it. US
residential electricity prices rose nearly 5% in 2026, with the steepest
increases concentrated on the East Coast, where new data-center buildout has
been heaviest. That is a national trend, not proof that any single data center
caused any single household's bill increase, but the regional overlap between
price increases and data-center construction is close enough to explain why the
political argument has traction. Utility executives, for their part, have
generally argued that new data-center demand helps justify grid investments
that benefit all customers over time, a framing regulators in several states
are actively weighing against the shorter-term bill impact.
Why It Matters
The Debate Splits Along Where the Data Centers Actually Sit
Both parties broadly want the jobs and tax revenue AI infrastructure
investment brings, which is part of why this fight does not split neatly along
party lines. The electricity-cost backlash instead concentrates in districts
already hosting or slated to host data centers, regardless of which party
represents them, which is part of why Vice President Vance's comments departed
from the administration's simpler build-it message. The disagreement is less
about whether AI data centers should exist and more about who absorbs the grid
costs that come with them. That geographic, rather than partisan, pattern is
showing up in local elections and utility commission appointments in several
states with heavy data-center construction, a dynamic that could matter more to
the outcome than any statement from Washington.
Everyone in Washington wants the AI data centers. Fewer people want to explain
the electric bill that comes with them.
That distinction matters directly for markets. Utilities like Constellation
Energy and Vistra have become AI-adjacent stocks precisely because their power
output is the scarce input the data-center boom needs, and both companies'
share prices moved higher Tuesday, up roughly 2.0% and 0.5% respectively. Those
same stocks are also exposed to the political side of this story, since new
state-level cost-allocation rules or a federal framework could reshape how
quickly utilities can build new capacity and how much of the cost they can pass
through to data-center customers specifically rather than the general ratepayer
base.
By The Numbers
Key FactWhat It Means
2026 Residential Electricity PricesUp nearly 5% nationally, steepest on the
East Coast
Constellation Energy (Tuesday)Closed at $280.25, up about 2.0% on the session
Vistra (Tuesday)Closed at $138.07, up about 0.5% on the session
Political PositionsTrump: "let Data Reign." Warren: opposes shifting AI power
costs onto household bills.
Constellation Energy and Vistra shares on the Tuesday session marking the
latest exchange over AI data-center power costs, September 1, 2026.
Reader Question
President Trump frames AI data centers as jobs and tax revenue communities
should welcome. Senator Warren frames the same buildout as a bill families
shouldn't have to cover. Strip away the politics and the real question is
narrower: who should pay for the new power capacity these data centers require?
Easier buildout, or protecting household electricity rates?
Hit reply — one line is enough.
What to Watch Next
State Regulators Hold the Real Leverage
The public statements getting headlines this week are not where the actual
decisions get made. State public utility commissions set the real
cost-allocation rules for new transmission and generation capacity, and several
states have already opened or completed formal dockets specifically addressing
how data-center electricity demand should be billed. Those proceedings, not a
presidential social media post or a senator's floor statement, are likely to
determine whether household electricity bills keep climbing alongside
data-center construction. Those dockets typically run for months and involve
extensive filings from utilities, data-center operators, and consumer
advocates, a slower and less visible process than the public statements
currently generating headlines.
Watch for any move by Congress or the White House toward a federal framework
for data-center electricity costs, which would represent a materially bigger
structural shift than the current back-and-forth of public statements. Watch
also whether Constellation Energy and Vistra address data-center demand or
political and regulatory risk more prominently in their next quarterly
guidance, since that would signal how seriously utility management teams are
taking the cost-allocation fight.
What to Watch Next 1 · State utility commission dockets
These bodies, not Congress, currently set the rules for how new data-center
power demand gets billed to ratepayers.
2 · Federal framework proposals
Any move by the White House or Congress to standardize data-center electricity
cost rules would mark a bigger shift than public statements alone.
3 · Utility earnings guidance
Watch whether Constellation Energy and Vistra cite data-center demand or
political risk more prominently in upcoming guidance.
The Bottom Line
The public fight over who pays is really a fight over cost-allocation rules
that most voters will never read in full, and those rules are being decided
state by state in regulatory dockets rather than settled by any single
statement out of Washington this week.
A rise in utility share prices does not resolve the underlying question of
whether ratepayers or data-center operators bear the new grid costs. That
question gets answered in state proceedings over months, not in the headlines
generated by a presidential post and a senator's response.
The real decision on who pays for AI's power demand is being made in state
utility commission dockets, not in the public statements getting this week's
headlines.
One More Question
National electricity prices are up nearly 5% in 2026, and part of that
increase traces back to exactly the kind of data-center buildout described in
today's story hitting regional grids. A bill increase in that range is easy to
miss month to month but adds up over a year. Has your own electricity bill
moved enough in 2026 to shape your household budget or your view of utility
stocks like the ones here?
Andrew reads every reply.
Trader Insight Media
<[link removed]>
<[link removed]>
<[link removed]> <[link removed]>
Manage Preferences
Email me once a day <[link removed]>
3-Day email break <[link removed]>
Unsubscribe from all
<[link removed]>
TraderInsightMedia.com brought to you by Media One Marketing LLC. This
editorial email with educational news was sent to
[email protected].
Please add our email address to your contact book (or mark as important) to
guarantee that our emails continue to reach your inbox.
Thank you for your comments and inquiries, which are greatly appreciated by
Media One Marketing LLC.
Please note that we are unable to provide personalized financial advice. This
email does not constitute financial advice, and any investment decisions you
make are solely your own responsibility.
Having trouble with the unsubscribe link? Just reply to this email with
“Unsubscribe,” and we’ll take care of it. If you have a moment, tell us what
you didn’t like — your feedback would be very helpful to our team.
Privacy Policy <[link removed]>
View Online
<[link removed]>
Unsubscribe
<[link removed]>
Contact Us <mailto:
[email protected]>
Media One Marketing LLC. All rights reserved
511 N Boardwalk, Rehoboth Beach, DE 19971