No images? Click here [link removed]

Welcome to The Corner. In this issue, we introduce our new report on Amazon, which reveals how the corporation built a surveillance infrastructure to monitor its workers’ every move, and we announce the Oct. 27 publication of Monopolies Suck, the new book by Open Markets Director of Enforcement Sally Hubbard.

Groundbreaking Open Markets Report Exposes Amazon’s Omnipresent Surveillance of Its Workers

The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the use of surveillance software by employers, and Amazon is leading this troubling trend. Amazon continuously and pervasively surveils its more than 800,000 workers, and this surveillance harms workers in a variety of ways. Amazon uses surveillance to deter workers from legal efforts to unionize, and to make it easier for the corporation to terminate workers for deviating from metrics the workers don’t even know exist. The surveillance also harms the health and mental well-being of workers. For example, Amazon requires its warehouse workers to use item scanners that count down the number of seconds within which employees must complete their assigned tasks. Amazon’s process creates the psychological effect of a constant “ low-grade [[link removed]] panic [[link removed]]” to work faster.

To call attention to this vital issue, the Open Markets Institute on Monday released a report titled “ Eyes [[link removed]] Everywhere: Amazon’s Surveillance Infrastructure and Revitalizing Worker Power [[link removed]].” Our groundbreaking report was covered by Reu [[link removed]] t [[link removed]] e [[link removed]] r [[link removed]] s [[link removed]], [[link removed]] The New York Times [[link removed]], The Independent [[link removed]] , [[link removed]] [[link removed]] [[link removed]], Channel News Asia [[link removed]], Vice [[link removed]], Fortune [[link removed]], The Hill’s Rising [[link removed]], and [[link removed]] The National Post [[link removed]].

In our report, we present overwhelming evidence that workers do not have a second of privacy from the moment they walk onto Amazon’s premises. For some employees, Amazon’s surveillance infrastructure is even attached to their bodies, in the form of item scanners. When employees fall behind Amazon’s productivity rate (e.g., packages processed per hour), software in the scanners reprimands the employees who spend too much “time off task.” The reprimands include official warnings and even termination.

As we report, Amazon has set up cameras throughout the warehouses, to monitor employees’ every word and movement. When these cameras capture workers stealing items from a warehouse, Amazon displays the images on giant television screens. The practice publicly shames the people caught stealing and bluntly reminds workers that the company is watching them at all times — and that any deviation from Amazon’s rules will result in severe punishment and humiliation.

Beyond the individual harm that Amazon’s surveillance causes, the corporation’s practices also deter and prevent workers from unionizing. In an exclusive interview with Open Markets, Hibaq Mohamed, an Amazon warehouse worker in Minneapolis, said that Amazon uses its surveillance infrastructure to move around employees whom management suspects of collectively organizing.

Our new report also highlights how Amazon’s surveillance practices embody one of the signature problems of monopoly power: the ability to limit not just the salaries of workers, but also their freedom and privacy. Importantly, the problem is not limited to Amazon. Other dominant corporations, such as Walmart, are adopting similar practices. Walmart recently purchased [[link removed]] facial recognition software to identify workers and customers in its stores and monitor their productivity, location, and purchases.

In our report, we present a raft of policy solutions for Congress, state legislators, federal and state agencies, and antitrust enforcers to enact new worker protections and prevent the formation of dominant corporations. Specifically, Congress and state legislators should pass legislation requiring employers to obtain approval for surveillance practices. Federal agencies should enact bright-line merger rules, to limit not just monopolization but concentration of power and control over workers.

Read the full report here [[link removed]].

SALLY HUBBARD’S

NEW BOOK

MONOPOLIES SUCK

7 Ways Big Corporations Rule Your Life and How to Take Back Control

Simon & Schuster will publish Monopolies Suck [[link removed]] by Sally Hubbard on Oct. 27. The book is the first by Hubbard, who is Open Markets’ director of enforcement strategy. Hubbard examines how modern monopolies rob Americans of a healthy food supply, the ability to care for the sick, and a habitable planet, because monopolies use business practices that deplete rather than generate. Monopolists also threaten fair elections, our free press, our privacy, and, ultimately, the American Dream, Hubbard shows. In Monopolies Suck, Hubbard reminds readers that antitrust enforcers already have the tools to dismantle corporate power and that decisive action must be taken before monopolies undermine our economy and democracy for generations to come. In Monopolies Suck, Sally provides an important new view of America’s monopoly crisis and of the political and economic harms of concentrated private power. Pre-order your copy here [[link removed]].

🔊 ANTI-MONOPOLY RISING:

The Athena Coalition, Open Markets Institute, and more than 40 organizations hosted a special open briefing for congressional staff, press, and members of the public on Tuesday to discuss the urgent need to break up Big Tech corporations in order to protect workers, independent businesses, communities, and democracy. Experts and advocates reflected on salient lessons from the House Antitrust Subcommittee’s groundbreaking Big Tech hearing on July 29, and speakers also analyzed the path forward for the broader anti-monopoly movement. ( American [[link removed]] Economic Liberties Project [[link removed]])

Department of Justice officials and state attorneys general are separately investigating Google for suspected use of unfair and anti-competitive tying arrangements, in which sellers illegally bundle distinct products and exclude rivals. ( Bloomberg [[link removed]])

More than 2,000 members of the All India Online Vendors Association sued Amazon in India for anti-competitive and unfair business practices, accusing the corporation of favoring certain bulk retailers who price products below cost in order to drive independent sellers out of the market. ( Reuters [[link removed]])

📝 WHAT WE'VE BEEN UP TO:

Sandeep Vaheesan published an article in Barron’s [[link removed]] on how the Epic Games lawsuit against Apple and Google offers a template for antitrust enforcers seeking to discipline other tech monopolists.

Claire Kelloway’s article [[link removed]] was quoted in Food Processing [[link removed]]. Her article investigated the purchase of a Colorado lamb processing plant by Brazil’s JBS, one of the world’s largest meat corporations.

Barry Lynn was quoted in T [[link removed]] he New York Times [[link removed]] supporting structural breakups of Big Tech and reining in their power. “The world is going to be better off after we break up these companies,” said Lynn.

Sally Hubbard was quoted in Bloomberg Law [[link removed]] explaining why drugmaker Teva Pharmaceutical should lose its fight against the Justice Department (DOJ) over the corporation’s price-fixing and market-allocation schemes for generic drugs. “I don’t think it’s a matter of the merits here. I don’t think Teva has an argument that they have a shot at succeeding with,” Hubbard said.

Barry Lynn’s cover story in the new issue of Harper’s, “ The [[link removed]] Big Tech Extortion Racket [[link removed]],” earned a spot in Ron Charles’ Book Club recommendations in The Washington Post [[link removed]].

Open Markets Institute hosted a virtual conversation [[link removed]], moderated by Barry Lynn, between Zephyr Teachout and David Dayen, each of whom recently released new books on monopoly and antitrust. Teachout’s new book is "Break 'Em Up," and Dayen’s new book is "Monopolized."

Open Markets Institute was mentioned in the San Diego Union-Tribune [[link removed]] as a signatory of a joint letter with 20 technology companies, carmakers, and advocacy groups urging the Federal Trade Commission to continue its antitrust fight against Qualcomm’s exclusionary patent licensing practices.

Open Markets Institute was cited in the Harvard Business Review [[link removed]] for inspiring action against Big Tech firms’ erosion of data privacy.

Barry Lynn was mentioned in The American Interest [[link removed]] [[link removed]]as a “leading advocate” [[link removed]]for regulation of Big Tech to reduce the industry’s market power.

The Open Markets Institute released a statement [[link removed]] pointing out that an article in The New York Times misidentified the causes of a growing book production shortage in the United States. The statement explained that the shortage has been driven by the destructive roll-up of press capacity by private equity firms, as detailed in an Open Markets letter [[link removed]] to the Justice Department in 2019.

We appreciate your readership. Please consider making a contribution to support the continued publication of this newsletter.

DONATE [[link removed]] 📈 VITAL STAT: 5 million

The number [[link removed]] of laptops that school districts across the United States need to combat critical shortages and delays in back-to-school supplies caused by disruptions from concentrated supply chains based in China.

📚 WHAT WE'RE READING: “ What Shall We Do About Self-Preferencing? [[link removed]]” (Competition Policy International, Pedro Caro de Sousa): de Sousa argues that digital platforms that engage in the act of self-preferencing — favoring one’s own products or services in a downstream market — can be justifiable at times, but there is potential for harm that goes beyond competition policy.

“ How Horizontal Shareholding Harms Our Economy—and Why Antitrust Law Can Fix It. [[link removed]]” (Harvard Business Law Review, Einer Elhauge): Elhauge argues that the anti-competitive effects of horizontal shareholding involve more industries than the traditional examples of banking and airlines, and Elhauge builds new legal theory on the Sherman Antitrust Act to address the issue.

BARRY LYNN’S

NEW BOOK

Liberty From All Masters

The New American Autocracy vs. The Will of the People

St. Martins Press will publish Open Markets Executive Director Barry Lynn’s new book, Liberty From All Masters [[link removed]], on September 29. The book is Barry’s first since Cornered, in 2010. In it, he details how Google, Amazon, and Facebook developed the ability to manipulate the flow of news, information, and business in America, and are transforming this power into autocratic systems of control. Barry then details how Americans over the course of two centuries built a “System of Liberty,” and shows how we Americans can put this system to work again today. Pre-order your copy here [[link removed]].

🔎 TIPS? COMMENTS? SUGGESTIONS?

We would love to hear from you—just reply to this e-mail and drop us a line. Give us your feedback, alert us to competition policy news, or let us know your favorite story from this issue.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER [[link removed]] DONATE [[link removed]] Open Markets Institute

1440 G St NW, Washington, DC xxxxxx We thought you'd like to be in the know about competition policy news. Liked what you read? Please forward to a friend or colleague.

Written and edited by: Barry Lynn, Michael Bluhm, Daniel A. Hanley, Udit Thakur, and Garphil Julien

Image credit: nuttiwut rodbangpong via iStock Share [link removed] Tweet [link removed] Share [[link removed]] Forward [link removed] Preferences [link removed] | Unsubscribe [link removed]