đ View Online <[link removed]> | đ Share on Facebook <[link removed]>
Hi Friend,
Another big policy victory, another boondoggle out of Shane Jones' slush fund "Regional Infrastructure Fund", and a new myth-busting paper targeting Chlöe Swarbrick's fake news oft-repeated claims that the wealthy in New Zealand do not pay their âfair shareâ of tax.
Let's dive in, .
A win for democratic accountability: Mana Whakahono Ä Rohe agreements to be scrapped...
Last week, we were across the media and in inboxes blowing the whistle on councils rushing to sneak in undemocratic Mana Whakahono Ä Rohe agreements before the RMA is replaced.
The Governmentâs proposed laws would have prevented new agreements being initiated, but as drafted entrenched existing agreements â including those hurriedly negotiated before the new laws take effect â into the replacement planning system.
When the replacement bills were introduced late last year, just eight Mana Whakahono Ä Rohe agreements existed.
Since then, several dozen more have been agreed or initiated.
Funny timing, that...đ€
The agreements are being used to embed iwi groups within council planning and consenting decision-making processes, bind future elected councils, and often cannot be terminated without all parties agreeing.
Some councillors have not even been allowed to see what their own officials were negotiating. <[link removed]>
That is why we asked supporters to contact Government MPs and demand that the loophole be closed.
And contact them you did. đ
Over the weekend, so many supporters contacted MPs that the Beehive was clearly feeling the heat. đ„
Senior figures from National, ACT, and New Zealand First started contacting your humble Taxpayersâ Union.
By Monday morning, Mike Hosking was putting the issue directly to Christopher Luxon.
The Prime Minister called councils rushing through the agreements âdisingenuousâ and promised that RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop would have more to say "very soon".
While the Select Committee recommended allowing the agreements initiated before Royal Assent to continue being negotiated during the transition period and, if completed in time, transfer into the new system, it seems our campaign forced action.Â
On Monday Cabinet decided to amend the Bills so that all Mana Whakahono Ä Rohe agreements will be scrapped.
That is a major victory for those of us who believe local government and resource management/planning decision-makers should always be democratically accountability.
Even the <[link removed]>NZ Heraldâs <[link removed]> Thomas Coughlan credited the decision to a âfierce campaignâ by your humble Taxpayers' Union and our friends at Federated Farmers. <[link removed]>
We will take that! đȘ
...but new "Iwi Participation Agreements" to be introduced đ
While the past week shows that political pressure works, it's not the end of the story. The Government intends to replace Mana Whakahono Ä Rohe with new, supposedly ânarrowly scopedâ iwi participation agreements covering statutory planning processes and matters required to give effect to Treaty settlements.
And the Select Committee has recommended requiring every spatial planning committee to include at least one member with âknowledge, skill, and experience relating to te ao MÄori and MÄori developmentâ.
The report does not say that this member must be elected, nor does it suggest they would be denied voting rights.
By all appearances, that means an unelected appointee may sit and vote alongside elected representatives on committees making major regional planning decisions.
That is still undemocratic "co-governance".
Chris Bishop says the legislation will include clear guardrails to prevent scope creep.
But we have heard something similar before from Bishop's Cabinet colleague, Simon Watts.
National promised to repeal Labourâs co-governance model under Three Waters. It repealed the law â but then allowed councils to establish exactly the same 'co-governance' governance arrangements under Watts' "Local Water Done Well" policy.
We cannot allow the Government to scrap Mana Whakahono Ä Rohe agreements only to recreate privileged decision-making rights through new agreements and unelected race-based committee appointments. <[link removed]>
Our position remains principled: councils should engage constructively with iwi, just as they should engage with farmers, businesses, ratepayers, community organisations, and everyone else affected by planning decisions.
That means decisions affecting property rights, planning rules, and resource consents should ultimately remain with representatives whom the public can vote in â and vote out.
Expert advice and consultation do not require unelected representatives to be given votes around the decision-making table.
So yes, this is a significant win. But after Three Waters, be assured that we will be reading the fine print *very* carefully.
Shane Jonesâ Regional Infrastructure Fund: mussel farms and mystery money đŠȘđž
And itâs not just Chris Bishop weâre waiting to see the fine print from...
Another week, another "regional infrastructure" announcement from Shane Jones about taxpayer backing for regional roadrail linebridgemussel farm.
Eh?!đł
Yes, seriously, Jones is pumping $4.5 million of taxpayer cash into a "joint iwi mussel spat project" in the Far North. <[link removed]> The four local iwi partners will run the project and contribute $1.3 million in what the Government calls "co-funding".
Now, regular readers will not be shocked to learn that the Taxpayersâ Union is not exactly wild about politicians playing venture capitalist with our money.
If a project is commercially viable, private investors should be lining up to fund it. If they are not, taxpayers deserve to know why the Government thinks it knows better.
But here is the real kicker:Â Even when taxpayer money is being handed out through the Regional Infrastructure Fund, the Government is refusing to release the key terms.
As Kate MacNamara pointed out in the Herald (unfortunately paywalled) the excuse is âcommercial sensitivityâ, with officials effectively arguing that releasing the details âcould prejudice the commercial position of the parties involvedâ. <[link removed]>
Sorry, but no.
These are taxpayer-backed "loans" but made on very favourable terms. That is the whole point of the scheme. If the terms were the same as the market would offer, the Government would not need to be involved.
And we have seen how badly this can all go.
The WhakatĆhea Mussels project in ĆpĆtiki â another example of what Mr Jones considers deserving "regional infrastructure" <[link removed]> â has already soaked up tens of millions in public money while struggling to deliver on big promises. <[link removed]>
That's a warning red neon sign flashing so bright even the Matua should see it. đš
Taxpayers do not need warm words about âregional developmentâ, âsocial goodâ, and BS about handouts being a "loan".
We say taxpayers have the right to know who is getting the taxpayer money, what terms apply, what security (if any) has been negotiated, and who carries the can if it all goes belly up.
While reasonable minds could differ on the merits of slush funds like the Provincial Growth Fund or Regional Infrastructure Fund, at the very least, they should be transparent.
If Ministers are gambling with taxpayersâ money, taxpayers deserve to at least see the betting slip.
DIAâs $11.7m pokie project: changing stories, no jackpot đ°
<[link removed]>
And speaking of taxpayer-funded gambles, there is something grimly appropriate about a pokie machine IT project turning into one.
According to the Sunday Star-Times, the Integrated Gambling Project began in 2008 as a supposedly âfreeâ Department of Internal Affairs upgrade to modernise the paper-based system used to regulate pokies. <[link removed]>
Fair enough. Modernisation is necessary, and even we cannot complain about a "free" project.
But unfortunately, someone got Wellington involved.
The project was initially pitched as a $2.75 million software upgrade.
But officials moved from an off-the-shelf service to bespoke software, costs escalated, and internal documents showed $9.2 million had already been spent by 2015, with approved funding rising above $19 million.
Thatâs the entirety of 815 average Kiwi workersâ entire yearly tax take, blown on a useless project.
When first questioned, DIA insisted the project had cost just $6.6 million.
Yet that figure did not square with its own documents. After more questions, the department has now changed its story again.
DIA now admits total expenditure reached $11.7 million. That's nearly 80 percent more than it first conceded.
The department says the project comprised $8.6 million in capital expenditure and $3.1 million in operating expenditure when it closed in May 2016.
It had previously pointed to around $5 million in savings negotiated with contractor Intralot. But those savings reduced the net impact on the gambling memorandum account â they did not reduce the projectâs total expenditure.
In other words, the $6.6 million figure was not the actual cost of the project.
Even better, the bespoke system took years to build and was replaced just four years later by KĆtare, an off-the-shelf (read: less expensive) platform.
DIA itself now says the bespoke system had limited functionality, required manual processing, and was labour-intensive to change.
So the department went from a âfreeâ project, to a $2.75 million business case, to $11.7 million in actual spending, before replacing the system four years later.
Not exactly confidence-inspiring.
The costs were ultimately loaded through fees on the pokie sector - money that could otherwise have gone back into community grants.
Worse, after those fees increased, DIAâs gambling memorandum account swung from a deficit of almost $13 million to a surplus of almost $20 million and still holds more than $15 million.
Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden has now demanded an immediate briefing and assurances that DIA has met its obligations.
The Auditor-General will also examine the account as part of this yearâs audit.
Good.
But taxpayers and community groups should not have to rely on repeated media questioning to drag the real numbers out of a government department.
When even the pokie regulator cannot make the numbers add up, someone needs to be held to account.
New paper busts the "rich not paying fair share of tax" porky đ°
<[link removed]>
As the election gets closer, Labour, the Greens, TOP, and Te PÄti MÄori are circling the same target: more tax.
The Greens want a wealth tax, a higher top income tax rate, a higher company tax rate, and an inheritance tax.
Labour wants a capital gains tax.
TOP wants a wealth land tax.
Te PÄti MÄori has also been pushing significant tax hikes, including wealth taxes.
And all of them rely on the same familiar line: âthe rich arenât paying their fair shareâ.
But the numbers tell a very different story.
We've just released Tax Inequality: Who really pays their fair share?, our new handbook looking at who *actually* carries New Zealandâs tax burden. <[link removed]>
And the numbers are pretty clear: under current tax settings, higher earners don't just pay the lionâs share, they're covering the lion, the pride, and the entire bloody savannah!
Based on official data from IRD, Stats NZ and the Treasury, the report exposes that:Â
- The top 20 percent of income earners pay nearly two-thirds of all personal income tax.
- The top 10 percent pay more than the bottom 80 percent combined.
- And the top 1 percent - just 46,939 taxpayers - pay more income tax than the entire bottom half of taxpayers combined.
Higher-income households pay disproportionately more GST as well, with the top 20 percent accounting for more than a third of the total GST take.
People can debate whether higher earners should pay even more. That is the nature of politics.Â
But what politicians cannot honestly claim is that successful New Zealanders are not already carrying a huge share of the tax burden.
New Zealandâs relatively simple, broad-base, low-rate tax system is one of our great economic strengths.
We should be very careful before piling more taxes on the people already doing the most to fund the system.
Tax Inequality sets out who really pays New Zealandâs tax burden - and why the âfair shareâ argument does not stack up. <[link removed]>
>> Read the report here << <[link removed]>
MPsâ gold-plated super scheme: rules for thee... đ°đ
While politicians argue that everyone else should pay more, they remain remarkably attached to their own taxpayer-funded perks. đ§
<[link removed]>
You may remember the recent fuss over Chris Hipkins using his parliamentary superannuation scheme to help pay the mortgage on his family holiday home. <[link removed]>
Hipkins insisted it was ultimately his own money.
Well, yes - apart from the bit where taxpayers put in $2.50 for every $1 an MP contributes, up to more than $36,000 a year.
That is a retirement deal most New Zealanders could only dream of.
And it turns out MPs came remarkably close to losing it.
The NZ Herald revealed that the Remuneration Authority reviewed the scheme in 2020 and concluded it was not fair to taxpayers. <[link removed]>
It recommended phasing out the special arrangement for new MPs and putting them onto ordinary KiwiSaver-style terms.
Then Covid happened, the proposal was shelved, and â funny old thing â no one in Parliament rushed to revive it.
After all, politicians can say they are simply following the rules...
But they are also the only people with the power to change them.
According to Chris Hipkins, paying the mortgage on his holiday home stops MPs from becoming corrupt... đ€š
Chris Hipkins has now offered an extraordinary defence of the perk: generous pay (and *very* generous retirement benefits) apparently stop politicians from becoming corrupt. <[link removed]>
Sorry, what?Â
According to Hipkins, looking after MPs financially reduces the temptation to take outside work or make decisions with their next job in mind.
Maybe there is a grain of truth in that (if we pay MPs minimum wage, the risks of corruption are obvious), but that cannot extend to justifying taxpayers having to contribute five times the standard employer KiwiSaver rate to stop MPs going rogue.
If Hipkins genuinely believes politicians are underpaid, he should argue openly for higher salaries.
Hiding extra remuneration inside gold-plated superannuation schemes, tax-free allowances, and accommodation perks is neither transparent nor fair.
David Seymour, to his credit, has said he is open to reforming the scheme.
Now every party leader needs to say where they stand.
As I told the NZ Herald last week, if KiwiSaver is good enough for you and me, itâs good enough for MPs too. <[link removed]>
We are calling for MPsâ special superannuation scheme to be scrapped, tax-free cash entitlements to be replaced with reimbursement for genuine expenses, and MPs to be stopped from using taxpayer-funded accommodation payments to rent properties from themselves.
Politicians designed these perks for politicians â send the party leaders a message telling them it is time to end the gravy train. <[link removed]>
MPs may have their retirement sorted, but younger New Zealanders are being told to pay more for theirs â while continuing to fund everybody elseâs...
Thatâs all for this week, Friend â thanks, as always, for standing with us.
Tory Relf
Head of Comms
New Zealand Taxpayersâ Union
In the Media:
Newstalk ZBKerre Woodham: Stuart Nash - indiscreet and hopeless <[link removed]>
The Spinoff The scrapping of Mana Whakahono Ä Rohe agreements, explained <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Not looking for a fight about scroggin (22 July 2026) <[link removed]>
More FM More FM 3pm - Item 1 <[link removed]>
The Platform The Government Push-Back On Iwi/Council Co-Goverance Agreements <[link removed]>
CountryWide Media Rachel Brooking - RMA bills: âLate stage lobbying an appalling way to make lawsâ <[link removed]>
Bassett, Brash & Hide DON BRASH: We stopped MWAR. Here's what they're replacing it with. <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Full Show Podcast: 21 July 2026 <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Paul Goldsmith: Treaty negotiations minister responds to Labour's RMA and enrolment concerns <[link removed]>
Not PC This is what a Luxon-led Government means by being "pro-business" <[link removed]>
RNZ Tina Porou discusses scrapping of iwi council agreements <[link removed]>
The PlatformChris Trotter On The Troubles In Mt Albert Electorate <[link removed]>
RNZ Chlöe Swarbrick on Green Party's new energy policy <[link removed]>
The Platform The Council-Iwi Agreements That Sabotage Government Reforms <[link removed]>
TVNZ Iwi-council agreements 'narrowly scoped' in late change to new RMA system <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBGovernment scraps existing iwi agreements as RMA reform enters final stages <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Let voters decide future over rogue councillors <[link removed]>
Gisborne HeraldâHe took a swing at meâ, says mayor <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Newstalk ZB Auckland 8pm - Item 5 <[link removed]>
NZ Herald Auckland mayor Wayne Brown accused of ânuisanceâ behaviour at fundraiser <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Tania Tapsell: Rotorua Mayor discusses the dismantling of iconic the Prince's Gate Archway <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Jordan Williams: Taxpayers Union Director chats council rush to sign iwi agreements before RMA reform <[link removed]>
Dog & Lemon The trucking industry should contribute to the cost of the new Cook Strait ferries <[link removed]>
Newsroom A governing party's lament: Why don't they appreciate us? <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBTaxpayers Union Director chats council rush to sign iwi agreements before RMA reform <[link removed]>
RNZRNZ News at 12pm, July 17 <[link removed]>
TVNZ Auckland mayor considers extra security after man 'took a swing' <[link removed]>
RNZ More security on cards after man 'took a swing' at Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Newstalk ZB Auckland 7am - Item 2 <[link removed]>
Waikato Times DIY sale: Bunnings sale not all about bang for ratepayersâ buck <[link removed]>
NZ Herald Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown says drunken man âtook a swingâ at him at National Party fundraiser <[link removed]>
The Westport News More security on cards after man takes âa swingâ at mayor <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBThe Huddle: Is banning smartphones really the way to go? <[link removed]>
RNZ The Panel with Eve McCallum and Simon Pound, Part 1 <[link removed]>
The Post NPDC-controlled water entity Wai Hononga makes new chief executive appointment <[link removed]>
The Post Hope v despair as polls reinforce the major partiesâ stagnation <[link removed]>
Waikato Times Council to ditch controversial former Bunnings building <[link removed]>
The Platform The Latest Polls & The Dream Ride Being Given To The Opportunity Party <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBNewstalk ZB Auckland 7am - Item 6 <[link removed]>
Taranaki Daily Iwi cry foul over reform options <[link removed]>
The Platform Michael Laws Analyses The Latest RNZ Opinion Poll <[link removed]>
NZ Herald Video surfaces of councillor Christine Fletcher accusing Mayor Wayne Brown of swearing at meeting <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBFull Show Podcast: 13 July 2026 <[link removed]>
RNZ The Panel with Sue Kedgely and Vincent Holloway, Part 1 <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBNathaniel Herz Jardine: Christchurch City Councillor on the city installing $200k CBD mural <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB'Big part of our strategy': Christchurch City Councillor defends $200k street lights and mural <[link removed]>
The Post Iwi cry foul as reform options set out by Taranaki councils <[link removed]>
The PlatformThe Platform 2pm - Item 1 <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBNewstalk ZB Auckland 2pm - Item 3 <[link removed]>
Listener Danyl McLauchlan: Narendra Modi can count India as a âone nationâ success but can Winston Peters do the same? <[link removed]>
NZ Herald Fair to the taxpayer? MPs dodged cuts to their lavish super scheme <[link removed]>
Whakaata MaoriIwi cry foul as reform options set out by Taranaki councils <[link removed]>
NZ Herald Poll of polls: Coalition slump continues, but Labourâs path to power lies with Opportunity <[link removed]>
ODT KaikĆura landslip warning, progress made on SH1 <[link removed]>
The Post Yes, we can redesign pensions without screwing young people <[link removed]>
Local Democracy Reporting Iwi Cry Foul As Reform Options Set Out By Taranaki Councils <[link removed]>
The Kaka Friday's Early Bird: Top News; Scoops; Deep-Dives; My Picks n' Mixes; Front Pages & Cartoons <[link removed]>
The PressCooke: A recess week of reality <[link removed]>
The Post A recess week of reality <[link removed]>
RNZRNZ News at 10pm, July 9 <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Afternoon Edition: 09 July 2026 <[link removed]>
RNZA-Z of Aotearoa: W for What Now?! <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Newstalk ZB Auckland 8pm - Item 4 <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Full Show Podcast: 09 July 2026 <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Barry Soper: Newstalk ZB senior political correspondent on the Government looking into joining up with Australia and Fiji's defence pact <[link removed]>
RNZ New Zealand looking at joining a new defence treaty <[link removed]>
RNZ The Panel with Heather Roy and Mike Williams, Part 1 <[link removed]>
StuffEx-Lotto presenter did Health NZ promo while suspended on full pay from another agency after FBI sting <[link removed]>
ODT Hipkins edges Luxon as preferred PM in latest poll <[link removed]>
Stuff Hipkins overtakes Luxon but Coalition hangs on by a hair in latest poll <[link removed]>
The Platform The Platform 4pm - Item 3 <[link removed]>
RNZ RNZ National 3pm - Item 1 <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Newstalk ZB Auckland 3pm - Item 3 <[link removed]>
More FM More FM 3pm - Item 3 <[link removed]>
The Post No KiwiSaver bounce, but coalition still ahead in latest poll <[link removed]>
Interest.co.nz Latest poll shows gap between National and Labour narrows <[link removed]>
The Times Online Labour Partyâs support falls in new political poll <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Chris Hipkins, Christopher Luxon neck and neck in preferred Prime Minister rankings <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB THE RE-WRAP: Life Is Good. But Expensive <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZB Mike's Minute: I'm not convinced the Reserve Bank was right <[link removed]>
New Zealand Taxpayers' Union · 117 Lambton Quay, Level 4, Wellington 6011, New Zealand
This email was sent to
[email protected]. To change your email preferences, click here <[link removed]>.
Authorised by the New Zealand Taxpayers' Union, Level 4, 117 Lambton Quay, Wellington 6011.