From James at Full Fact <[email protected]>
Subject Express headline on how many carers fear for their jobs is flawed
Date August 14, 2020 6:30 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
The headline was based on a poll with a small sample size and did not match exactly what was asked in the survey.

14 Aug 2020 | Facts and news from Full Fact
View in your browser ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** Express headline on how many carers fear for their jobs is flawed
------------------------------------------------------------

The Express published an article claiming that “as many as 4.7 million” people who have caring responsibilities could end up without a job due to “unsupportive” employers.

In their headline, they claimed “carers fear the sack if they put loved ones first.” But the poll this is based on does not mention sacking at all. The data comes from a survey of 2,004 UK adults, 280 of whom said they were carers.

178 carers, or around 8.9% of respondents to the survey said “yes” to the question: “do you think you would ever have no option but to give up your existing job to help care for a dependent or relative due to lack of support and flexibility from your employer?”

This percentage was then applied to the total UK adult population to give the 4.7 million figure. This makes assumptions about the entire UK population based on a small sample size of 280, and the smaller the sample of people who respond to a question the larger the margin of error is likely to be.

The question the Express headline is based on is phrased as a hypothetical. And the headline could suggest people are imminently in danger of losing jobs, rather than it being an unmeasured possibility sometime in the future.

We asked the Express to correct the article, and it has changed the headline and article to remove references to people facing "the sack" and the 4.7 million figure.
Problems with the poll ([link removed])
As the pandemic rolls on we still face harmful bad information. Can we count on you to help protect people from it? ([link removed])

In the middle of a health pandemic, good information is vital. But with our own newspapers confusing the facts, it can be hard to tell what’s true and what’s not. Can you help make sure the public get the accuracy they deserve?

We rely on monthly supporters to hold politicians and the press accountable for the things they say in public.

Uncertain times are ahead. As bad information about the coronavirus continues to surge, we need your immediate support.

Just a few pounds a month helps ensure harmful false errors are spotted and called out.

If you agree that good information saves lives, can we count on you today?
Yes, you can count on me ([link removed])


** CAMPAIGNS
------------------------------------------------------------


** Full Fact welcomes consultation to update our outdated election laws ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

This week the government put forward a proposal to require digital election material to explicitly show who is promoting it and on whose behalf - also known as a ‘digital imprint’.

Full Fact has been campaigning for the introduction of digital imprints for a long time, and we thank the hundreds of you who shared our calls via email and social media.

All voters should know who is targeting them online and who is paying for it. This sort of transparency is crucial for elections in a democracy.

We said before the last election that these changes were urgent, and that is still true now. Our votes were left unprotected in 2019, but local elections are planned for next spring. The government must act quickly following the consultation to ensure our democracy is properly protected.
This is urgent ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** Facebook posts wrongly claim Covid-positive children can be detained without their parents’ permission ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

We’ve seen a number of Facebook posts claiming that the Coronavirus Act means that children can be taken out of school without their parents’ permission and detained for 14 days if they are suspected to have Covid-19.

However, the government says a parent, carer or legal guardian would have to be present for a Covid-19 test to take place under the powers given to Public Health England in the Coronavirus Act.

The act doesn’t give the authorities the power to detain a child for 14 days without their parents’ knowledge or permission. It’s most likely that a child would be asked to self-isolate for 14 days at home with their family if they did not obey public health advice, but if this is not possible, other avenues would be discussed.
Where did this claim come from? ([link removed])


** FACT CHECK
------------------------------------------------------------


** Also this week...
------------------------------------------------------------
* Coronavirus height study is a tall tale ([link removed])
* You were more likely to catch Covid-19 in Spain than the UK in late July ([link removed])
* Leicester residents are not being forcibly tested for coronavirus ([link removed])
* The RSPCA has said that they are worried people will abandon pets because the economic effects of Covid-19 ([link removed])

Read our latest fact checks ([link removed])


** Stop the spread of bad information ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Find these updates useful? We'd be incredibly grateful if you could share our fact checks and help more people access good information.
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Feconomy%2Fexpress-employed-carers%2F Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Feconomy%2Fexpress-employed-carers%2F)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
[link removed] Share ([link removed])

============================================================
Many thanks from the Full Fact team
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
** Like us ([link removed])
** Like us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
Please note that we do not respond to replies to this email. If you have any questions or feedback please ** visit our contact form. ([link removed])


You can ** find out how we’re funded here ([link removed])
.
Copyright © Full Fact 2020 - All rights reserved

A registered charity (no. 1158683) and a non-profit company (no. 6975984) limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales.

Our mailing address is:
2 Carlton Gardens, London, SW1Y 5AA

We use Mailchimp to send you our emails and to see which articles are most popular. ** Read our privacy policy ([link removed])
or ** Mailchimp's privacy policy ([link removed])

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
** update subscription preferences ([link removed])
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Full Fact
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United Kingdom
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • MailChimp