From Gatestone Institute <[email protected]>
Subject Why Mohamed bin Zayed — and Donald Trump — Represent a New Architecture for Peace
Date December 8, 2025 10:16 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[link removed]

In this mailing:
* Robert Williams: Why Mohamed bin Zayed — and Donald Trump — Represent a New Architecture for Peace
* Lawrence Kadish: President Trump's 'Warp Speed' Defense Industry


** Why Mohamed bin Zayed — and Donald Trump — Represent a New Architecture for Peace ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

by Robert Williams • December 8, 2025 at 5:00 am
* [T]wo leaders have reshaped the strategic map with a clarity rarely seen in this era: United States President Donald J. Trump and United Arab Emirates President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan (MBZ).
* MBZ's long-term project is not ideological and not transactional. It is developmental. His vision of governance is anchored in four pillars: modernity, competence, coexistence, and scientific advancement.
* This is why the UAE has become a regional pioneer in space exploration, renewable energy, and peaceful nuclear development. It is why the country became the third in the world — after the United States and China — to invest at scale in artificial intelligence, signing multibillion-dollar agreements to accelerate the technological transformation of its economy.
* MBZ understood that a modern Middle East cannot be built by capitulating to militancy.
* His reforms stand in stark contrast to the ideological rigidity of groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood, whose governance models have produced paralysis, institutional weakness, and repeated humanitarian disasters. Where they promote confrontation, MBZ promotes capacity-building. Where they elevate dogma, he elevates human development.
* The Nobel Peace Prize has often been awarded to symbolic acts or aspirational visions. But the Middle East today demands something different: recognition of leaders whose decisions produced tangible pathways to peace, stability, and human survival. Trump and MBZ did not simply speak about peace; they engineered it.
* The Nobel Peace Prize should acknowledge both. History surely will.

Two leaders have reshaped the strategic map with a clarity rarely seen in this era: United States President Donald J. Trump and United Arab Emirates President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan (MBZ). Pictured: Trump meets with MBZ at the White House on May 15, 2017, in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chris Kleponis/Pool/Getty Images)

At a time when diplomacy is paralyzed, institutions are overwhelmed, and war has returned to the Middle East with devastating force, two leaders have reshaped the strategic map with a clarity rarely seen in this era: United States President Donald J. Trump and United Arab Emirates President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan (MBZ). Their approaches differ in style and origin, but converge on a single point: both pushed the region toward pragmatism at a moment when it was veering toward extremism and fragmentation. For this reason, both deserve to be considered among the most consequential peacemakers of the twenty-first century—and worthy of recognition at the highest international level, including the Nobel Peace Prize.

A Vision of Peace That Broke with Old Orthodoxy

Continue Reading Article ([link removed])


** President Trump's 'Warp Speed' Defense Industry ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

by Lawrence Kadish • December 8, 2025 at 4:00 am
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has turned to America's defense industry and told them -- in no uncertain terms -- that they should consider production to be on a wartime footing. Pictured: US President Donald Trump and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth at a Cabinet meeting in the White House in Washington, DC, on December 2, 2025. (Photo by Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth knows something the rest of us should embrace.

For the last five years, Communist China's military spending has grown consistently. Published reports suggest annual budget increases of 6.8-7.2%, rising from approximately $209 billion in 2021 to $246 billion in 2025. And that is only what is reported. The real numbers are undoubtedly much higher.

In response, Hegseth has turned to America's defense industry and told them -- in no uncertain terms -- that they should consider production to be on a wartime footing. It is recognition that our nation's ability to design and field new weapons systems usually takes years, sometimes decades. If deterrence is to play a role in keeping China's pistol in its holster, we do not have the luxury of time.

Continue Reading Article ([link removed])

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** RSS ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
Copyright © Gatestone Institute, All rights reserved.

You are subscribed to this list as [email protected]

You can change how you receive these emails:
** Update your subscription preferences ([link removed])
or ** Unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** Gatestone Institute ([link removed])

14 East 60 St., Suite 705, New York, NY 10022
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis