View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: November 10, 2025
------------------------------------------------------------


** Supreme Court Urged to Rein in President's Attempts to Establish a Standing Army, Use of Troops to Invade Chicago
------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Pushing back on President Trump’s claim that “I have the right to do anything I want to do,” a coalition of civil liberties organizations is calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to block the president’s attempt to deploy National Guard troops against civilians in Chicago ([link removed]) —warning that no president has ever possessed unilateral, unreviewable authority to use the military against Americans on U.S. soil.

Weighing in before the Supreme Court in Trump v. Illinois, the coalition—made up of The Rutherford Institute, the ACLU, ACLU of Illinois, the Knight First Amendment Institute, and FIRE—is urging the Court to rein in the president’s repeated efforts to create a de facto standing army ([link removed]) . The groups argue that the administration’s pattern of surging federal officers, such as ICE, into U.S. cities—Los Angeles, Portland, and Chicago—to provoke protests, then citing those protests as justification for military force, violates the First Amendment by chilling free speech and punishing dissent.

“The President’s attempt to turn the National Guard into a standing army on American soil—deploying troops against the American people—is one of the abuses of power the Constitution was written to restrain,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “Each time the President treats ordinary protest as rebellion and sends soldiers to enforce so-called ‘order’ in our cities, he’s not defending the nation—he’s dismantling the very freedoms that define it, all the while betraying the Constitution.”
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: SUPPORT THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ([link removed])

The case challenges the President’s attempt to federalize the Illinois National Guard and deploy troops to Chicago under 10 U.S.C. § 12406, which authorizes the President to call up the Guard when “there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States; or the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.” A federal district court issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) blocking the deployment, finding no evidence that protests in Illinois had impeded the federal government’s ability to enforce the law. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the TRO, rejecting the government’s argument ([link removed]) that local protests constituted a “rebellion.”

The Trump administration then sought emergency relief from the U.S. Supreme Court. Justice Amy Coney Barrett referred the government’s application to the full Court and requested additional briefing on whether “regular forces” refers to the regular forces of the U.S. military—and, if so, how that interpretation limits the President’s power to federalize the National Guard.

The coalition’s brief ([link removed]) emphasizes that throughout American history, the use of the military in domestic affairs has been tightly restricted by law, tradition, and the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids federal troops from engaging in civilian law enforcement except in the most extraordinary circumstances. Yet, as amici note, the president has invoked exaggerated claims of violence to justify troop deployments under Section 12406 in multiple cities. In some instances, largely peaceful protests against federal policies have been met with heavily armed agents using chemical weapons and stun grenades. Such tactics transform protected political speech into a pretext for military intervention.

Hina Shamsi, Charlie Hogle, Cecillia D. Wang, and others at ACLU advanced the arguments in the Trump v. Illinois amicus brief ([link removed]) .

The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) is a nonprofit civil liberties organization dedicated to making the government play by the rules of the Constitution. To this end, the Institute defends individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated and educates the public on a broad range of issues affecting their freedoms.

This press release is also available at www.rutherford.org ([link removed]) .

Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fthe-supreme-court-must-rein-in-presidential-attempts-to-establish-a-standing-army-invade-chicago Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fthe-supreme-court-must-rein-in-presidential-attempts-to-establish-a-standing-army-invade-chicago)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2025 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])