|
The case challenges the President’s attempt to federalize the Illinois National Guard and deploy troops to Chicago under 10 U.S.C. § 12406, which authorizes the President to call up the Guard when “there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States; or the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.” A federal district court issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) blocking the deployment, finding no evidence that protests in Illinois had impeded the federal government’s ability to enforce the law. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the TRO, rejecting the government’s argument that local protests constituted a “rebellion.”
The Trump administration then sought emergency relief from the U.S. Supreme Court. Justice Amy Coney Barrett referred the government’s application to the full Court and requested additional briefing on whether “regular forces” refers to the regular forces of the U.S. military—and, if so, how that interpretation limits the President’s power to federalize the National Guard.
The coalition’s brief emphasizes that throughout American history, the use of the military in domestic affairs has been tightly restricted by law, tradition, and the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids federal troops from engaging in civilian law enforcement except in the most extraordinary circumstances. Yet, as amici note, the president has invoked exaggerated claims of violence to justify troop deployments under Section 12406 in multiple cities. In some instances, largely peaceful protests against federal policies have been met with heavily armed agents using chemical weapons and stun grenades. Such tactics transform protected political speech into a pretext for military intervention.
Hina Shamsi, Charlie Hogle, Cecillia D. Wang, and others at ACLU advanced the arguments in the Trump v. Illinois amicus brief.
The Rutherford Institute is a nonprofit civil liberties organization dedicated to making the government play by the rules of the Constitution. To this end, the Institute defends individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated and educates the public on a broad range of issues affecting their freedoms.
This press release is also available at www.rutherford.org.
Source: https://tinyurl.com/588n23dz
|