From Health Affairs Today <[email protected]>
Subject COVID-19: Contact Tracing, Re-Envisioning Clinical Trials; Impact Of The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act On Obesity Trends
Date July 8, 2020 8:05 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
 

View Message in Browser

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

mailto:[email protected]

[link removed]

**The Latest Research, Commentary, and News from Health Affairs**

**Wednesday, July 8, 2020**

TODAY ON THE BLOG
COVID-19

Can Contact Tracing Work At COVID Scale?

By Amit Kaushal and Russ B. Altman

Large-scale contact tracing needs to track down as many leads as
possible while minimizing the disruption to healthy peoples' lives. We
need a data infrastructure to calibrate these efforts.
Read More >>

Re-Envisioning Clinical Trials During The COVID-19 Pandemic

By Deborah Plana, Andrea Arfè, and Michael S. Sinha

Existing research efforts are largely being set aside in favor of a new,
urgent goal: testing, treating, and preventing the disease caused by the
novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus.
Read More >>

IN THE JOURNAL

CULTURE OF HEALTH

Impact Of The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act On Obesity Trends

By Erica L. Kenney, Jessica L. Barrett, Sara N. Bleich, Zachary J. Ward,
Angie L. Cradock, and Steven L. Gortmaker

The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 established policies to
improve the nutritional quality of food served through subsidized and
free breakfast and lunch programs. Using national data from the period
2003-18, Erica Kenney and coauthors estimate the extent to which
childhood obesity trends were affected by the law. For children in
poverty the odds of having obesity increased each year leading up to the
law but began decreasing after its implementation. Read More >>

Read the July 2020 Table of Contents
.

Subscribe to Health Affairs for full journal access.

**A CLOSER LOOK**-Peer Comparisons

Policy makers are increasingly using performance feedback that compares
physicians to their peers as part of payment policy reforms. However, it
is not known whether peer comparisons can improve broad outcomes, beyond
changing specific individual behaviors such as reducing inappropriate
prescribing of antibiotics. In Health Affairs, Amol S. Navathe and
coauthors wrote about a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted
with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Hawaii to examine the impact of providing
peer comparisons feedback on the quality of care
to
primary care providers in the setting of a shift from fee-for-service to
population-based payment.

[link removed]

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

About Health Affairs

Health Affairs is the leading peer-reviewed journal
at the intersection of health,
health care, and policy. Published monthly by Project HOPE, the journal
is available in print and online. Late-breaking content is also found
through healthaffairs.org , Health Affairs
Today , and Health Affairs
Sunday Update .  

Project HOPE is a global health and
humanitarian relief organization that places power in the hands of local
health care workers to save lives across the globe. Project HOPE has
published Health Affairs since 1981.

Copyright © Project HOPE: The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

Health Affairs, 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Suite 600, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States

Privacy Policy

To unsubscribe from this email, click here
.                 
                                               
                        I
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis