Friend,
Last week was jam-packed with movement in more than half a dozen Second Amendment cases. And we wanted to make sure you didn’t miss a thing!
First, if you’re reading this, FPC is still under the gun to meet our Double Deadline (Weekly and Quarterly) on Tuesday. That’s in just over 48 hours!
It’s very important that we hit this goal on time, as it’s vital to funding everything from our NFA Lawsuit Blitz to petitioning SCOTUS to hear our “assault weapons” lawsuit.
<[link removed]>POWER THE WORK! <[link removed]>
If you’d like to contribute to help FPC meet the goal, we would deeply appreciate it. Any amount helps a ton, and you can make a contribution by clicking this link! <[link removed]>
Meanwhile, here’s what you may have missed during this last week in gun rights:
Monday, Sept. 22
- Wehr-Darroca v. District of Columbia: The district court granted the government’s motion to dismiss FPC’s 2A lawsuit challenging D.C.’s magazine ban.
- Harrel v. Raoul: FPC filed a motion for extension to file an en banc petition at the Third Circuit in our case taking on Illinois’ “assault weapon” and magazine bans.
- United States v. Peterson: The Fifth Circuit granted the Federal Government’s motion for extension to file a brief in response to the en banc petition in this NFA case.
- Viramontes v. Cook County: SCOTUS granted Cook County’s motion for extension to file a cert response brief in our IL “assault weapons” lawsuit.
- Lane v. Cacace:A joint status letter and request to file a future status letter was filed at the District Court in a challenge to NY’s “assault weapons” ban.
Wednesday, Sept. 24
- Granata v. Campbell:FPC filed a notice of appeal to the First Circuit at the District Court in our lawsuit challenging Massachusetts’ handgun roster and AG regulations.
Thursday, Sept. 25
- Wiese v. Bonta: The stay was lifted and summary judgment was granted (in FPC’s challenge to California’s mag ban) to the government in accordance with Duncan v. Bonta by the District Court.
Friday, Sept. 26
- Knife Rights v. Bonta: FPC filed an amicus brief arguing how courts should define “dangerous and unusual” and “in common use” at the Ninth Circuit.
<[link removed]>POWER THE WORK! <[link removed]>
That’s it for now, but make sure to stay tuned for future updates as we’ll have plenty more to share regarding our fight for your fundamental rights.
Thank YOU for Powering the Work, Friend!
For freedom and liberty,
– The FPC Team
NO PURCHASE IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN A CONTEST. A PURCHASE WILL NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF WINNING. ALL FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND MUNICIPAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS APPLY. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED.
Sweepstakes Rules <[link removed]> / Supporting Entry <[link removed]> / Alternate Means of Entry <[link removed]>
-=-=-
Firearms Policy Coalition - 5550 Painted Mirage Rd, Suite 320, Las Vegas, NV 89149, United States
This email was sent to
[email protected]. To stop receiving emails: [link removed]
-=-=-
Created with NationBuilder - [link removed]