|
Friend,
Last week was jam-packed with
movement in more than half a dozen Second Amendment cases. And we
wanted to make sure you didn’t miss a thing!
First, if you’re reading this, FPC is still under the gun
to meet our Double Deadline (Weekly and Quarterly) on Tuesday. That’s
in just over 48 hours!
It’s very important that we hit
this goal on time, as it’s vital to funding everything from our NFA
Lawsuit Blitz to petitioning SCOTUS to hear our “assault weapons”
lawsuit.
If
you’d like to contribute to help FPC meet the goal, we would deeply
appreciate it. Any amount helps a ton, and you can make a contribution
by clicking this link!
Meanwhile, here’s what you may have
missed during this last week in gun rights:
Monday, Sept. 22
-
Wehr-Darroca v. District of Columbia: The district court granted the government’s
motion to dismiss FPC’s 2A lawsuit challenging D.C.’s magazine
ban.
-
Harrel v. Raoul: FPC filed a motion for extension to file an
en banc petition at the Third Circuit in our case taking on Illinois’
“assault weapon” and magazine bans.
-
United States v.
Peterson: The Fifth Circuit granted the Federal Government’s motion for
extension to file a brief in response to the en banc petition in this
NFA case.
-
Viramontes v. Cook County: SCOTUS granted Cook County’s motion for
extension to file a cert response brief in our IL “assault weapons”
lawsuit.
-
Lane v. Cacace: A joint status letter and request to file a future status letter
was filed at the District Court in a challenge to NY’s “assault
weapons” ban.
Wednesday, Sept. 24
-
Granata v. Campbell:FPC filed a notice of appeal to the First
Circuit at the District Court in our lawsuit challenging
Massachusetts’ handgun roster and AG regulations.
Thursday, Sept. 25
-
Wiese v. Bonta: The stay was lifted and summary judgment
was granted (in FPC’s challenge to California’s mag ban) to the
government in accordance with Duncan v. Bonta by the
District Court.
Friday, Sept. 26
-
Knife Rights v. Bonta: FPC filed an amicus brief arguing how
courts should define “dangerous and unusual” and “in common use” at
the Ninth Circuit.
That’s it for now, but make sure to
stay tuned for future updates as we’ll have plenty more to share
regarding our fight for your fundamental rights.
Thank YOU for Powering the Work, Friend!
For freedom and
liberty,
– The FPC Team
NO PURCHASE IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN A CONTEST. A PURCHASE WILL
NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF WINNING. ALL FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND
MUNICIPAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS APPLY. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED.
Sweepstakes Rules / Supporting Entry / Alternate Means of Entry
|