đ View Online <[link removed]> | đ Share on Facebook <[link removed]>
Dear Friend,
As the country battens down the hatches for Cyclone Tam, your humble Taxpayers' Union is preparing for a different storm: the economic implications on New Zealand of the Trump tariffs.Â
This week, we also cut to the truth about whether Nicola Willis is spending big or cutting her cloth, and why she is so annoyed with the Taxpayers' Union.
We also, errr, expose Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet bureaucrats for looking at p*rn while at work. Awkward...
But first: the economy.
The impending storm clouds - growth forecasts slashed in half đŠď¸
Hot of the press this morning, Infometrics is the first of the major economic consultancies to put some actual numbers around what everyone agrees is an uncertain international situation.
The company says GDP growth for next year will come down from 2.4 percent to just 1.0 percent. Not good news for the Beehive or anyone who wants New Zealand to get out of the economic shtook.
Read more on the Infometrics website here:Â Economyâs recovery on ice as trade war hits growth <[link removed]>
Friend, all roads lead back to the need for this year's Budget (just 35 sleeps away) to go for growth.
New Zealand needs substantive policy, not just PR <[link removed]> and bumper sticker solutions <[link removed]>.
The best 'bang for buck' to get a rocket under growth is full capital expensing: to get businesses investing in the very capital that will make New Zealand more productive.
<[link removed]>To read more about the merits of the proposal click here. <[link removed]>
When the facts don't fit the political narrative: Nicola Willis takes a swipe at the Taxpayers' Union đą
The role of any good taxpayer advocate is to point out inconvenient fiscal truths. Sometimes that annoys the politicians â whoever is in Government. đŹ
So is the case with Nicola Willis who likes to position herself as a prudent fiscal manager. Among other things, she claims to be reigning back the last Government's excessive spending.
<[link removed]>
But the facts don't fit the narrative.
Last year's Budget (the first delivered by Nicola Willis) spent more than Grant Robertson's Budget the previous year. That's true for both measuring it in real (inflation adjusted) terms and as a percentage of the economy.
But Ms Willis continues to claims she's spending 'less'. How does she square the circle?
You see Friend, it's all framed up using what was projected using the earlier budgets.
In her Budget 2024 speech in Parliament <[link removed]>Â Nicola Willis highlighted that the final "operating allowance" (that is the term used for new baseline spending) for Budget 2024 was $3.2 billion, which is below the $3.5 billion allowance set by the previous government.
Willis emphasised that this is the lowest allowance in nominal terms since Budget 2018 and the lowest in real terms since the Sir Bill English-era. That's all true, but 'reduced' spending, it is not.
So let's cut to the facts:
- No matter how you measure it, Nicola Willis is spending more than Grant Roberson was actually spending (she's also borrowing at a faster rate than Robbo!)
- But she is spending less than Grant Robertson planned to spend.
The opposition use exactly the same spin trick đ
This reliance on forecasting - rather than actual spending â is the very same trick the opposition use to claim the Government has 'cut' public services. They treat the earlier longer-term forecasts as if it was real spending, and say that reductions to the size of an increase is a 'cut'. Â
Now you know...
Nicola Willis says we don't have 'our facts in a row'. Judge for yourself, ... âď¸
Last night on Heather du Plessis-Allan's NewstalkZB show, Nicola Willis gave your humble Taxpayers' Union a serve, claiming that "not for the first time, they haven't got their facts quite in a row" referring to our media release <[link removed]>.
<[link removed]>
>>Listen here<< <[link removed]>
Rather than hit back (we've been called worse! <[link removed]>), make up your own mind.
In 2015 â the Bank's five-year funding was set at $324.3 million. In 2020, it was hiked up to $639.6 million. Grant Robertson also granted "emergency" top ups for 2023 and 2024 ($48 million and $30 million, respectively).
Now it's time for the next five-year funding round and Willis says she's "cut" the funding to $775.6 million. Â
But that still amounts to a 21 percent hike on the last five-year agreement, and a 131 percent increase on the one before that.
The Government would have you believe itâs a funding reduction because â get this â the Reserve Bank asked for $1.03 billion and Nicola Willis didnât quite give them all of it. And, it is a reduction from the "emergency" funding that Grant Robertson waved through before exiting the building for his good mate Adrian Orr.
Friend, six years ago the Reserve Bank had 225 staff. Now it has 660 (not quite captured by the chart below).
Is Nicola Willis 'cutting' or just locking-in Grant Robertson's big-spending legacy? đ
<[link removed]>
It doesn't bode well for whatâs in store in next monthâs Budget...
Today's inflation data: Local council's continue to drive costs of living pressure đ¸
The other big economic news today is the latest inflation numbers released few hours ago. It's ticking up, and a big driver is yet again is the out of control council rates... đ
Local rates increases were responsible for 14 percent of the CPI increase.
You can read our comments to media here. <[link removed]>
TAXPAYER VICTORY! $400m green slush fund gets flushed đ˝âď¸
In better news, Minister for Climate Change Simon Watts has flushed the $400 million green slush fund known as the NZ Green Investment Finance Ltd (NZGIF). <[link removed]>
<[link removed]>
NZ Green Investment Finance Ltd (NZGIF) is a $400 million green slush fund that blew $115 million on Solar Zero (a company backed by trillion-dollar BlackRock) and still went bust. <[link removed]>
<[link removed]>
$280 million in climate handouts were dished out to big business in last year's Budget, including EV truck subsidies and âfuel switchingâ grants. Now itâs up to Nicola Willis to finish the job in Budget 2025 and put an end to the subsidies.
With an emissions trading scheme to reduce emissions already in place â why are we paying twice? We say the subsidies also need to go to zero.Â
Greenwashing lobbyists, youâre on notice. đ
Money doesn't grow on trees - unless you're funding a $12 billion defence plan? đŞđ°
The Government recently announced a $12 billion plan for Defence spending. <[link removed]>That's not chump change: it's the equivalent to $6,000 for every household.Â
Prime Minister Luxon told media that âwe can afford this,â but things get a bit murkier when it comes to how. đ¤
<[link removed]>
Most New Zealanders agree that New Zealand needs to up its defence. But with no savings flagged elsewhere how exactly are we to pay for it?
Ironically, only Australian media asked this blatantly obvious question. đ¤ˇ
<[link removed]>
The Government is already borrowing $6,000-per-household per year thanks to the deficit. The offical national debt clock is climbing $25 million higher every day. <[link removed]>
Thatâs not sustainable â and it's a real threat to New Zealand.
The Finance Minister has said that the extra $9 billion of new spending will come entirely from the Government's $2.4 billion yearly spending buffer. Even if that's true, it means the Government will effectively be pausing all other new capital spending: i.e. new hospital equipment, school refurbishments etc.
It just doesn't add up.
Speaking of Defence spending, our research team has come across an example of its spending that probably won't have New Zealand's adversaries shaking in their boots. Forget tanks, it's Beam scooters!
Marching round bases is so yesterday: Defence Force's $32,800 Beam Scooter joyrides đ´đ¨
Military heroes aren't always taxpayer heroes. Thanks to an anonymous tipper, our investigations team confirmed the Defence Force has spent $32,800 on e-scooters. <[link removed]> For one airforce base! đ¨
<[link removed]>
Yes - officials decided it was a good time for our nation's defenders to zip round on extortionately priced, rent-by-the-second e-scooters.Â
Even the most staunch taxpayer advocate knows we need a strong and capable Defence Force. But spending money preparing for the invasion of a skate park isn't it!
PM's Office caught with their tabs down đľ
It seems one too many late nights in the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) has left more than a few Cabinet staffers red-faced.
Some rather diligent digging from the Taxpayers' Union investigations team revealed 24 recorded 'incidents' of government personnel trying to access *ahem* adult entertainment on their work devices.
Now, Friend, we're all for a little (fiscal) discipline, and we certainly don't object to burning the midnight oil â but let's all agree there's no place for bureaucrats to be accessing smut while on the taxpayers' dime!
Either these staffers have way too much time on their hands â or not nearly enough accountability during their work time. Either way, taxpayers deserve more focus (or perhaps fewer distractions?) from the public service supporting the PM.
NEW POLL: âWoop! Woop!â â bad news for da' Greens đ¨
It's been a bad few weeks for the Greens, who've dug themselves into holes doubling down on controversies. đ <[link removed]>
Green Police and Corrections spokesperson Tamatha Paul MP is sticking to her comments that police made people feel more unsafe, should be defunded, and that prisons should be abolished.
However our latest Taxpayersâ Union-Curia Poll found that police on more beat patrols made 66 percent of people feel safer and only 10 percent feel less safe. <[link removed]>
Embarrassingly for Ms Paul, even her own party's voters don't agree with her.
The polls finds that 48 percent of Greens felt safer with more beat patrols, compared to just 19 percent who felt 'less safe'.
Speaking of feeling safe, apparently some people are scared of the Taxpayers' Union...
Ĺtorohanga Council's "risk list" - Guess who's number one đ
For local councils, back in the day it was floods or tsunami that resulted in claxons blaring, emergency meetings convening, and consultants paged to come into the office. But now it's the wrong person asking questions or looking a little too closely at their books. đ¨
A few months back, we were told that Ĺtorohanga District Council has been running a risk level assessment process that features, well, us!
So we asked about it, and your humble Taxpayers' Union feature at the very top of the "Risk Level Assessment" list!
It seems our student interns asking questions are ranked higher than a matters that pose a "potential security risk" for the Council!
Ratepayers pay the bills, and they should be able to get answers from any council without getting shoved into the queue to be fobbed off by spin doctors.Â
But wait â hereâs the best part.
After we broke this story, the Council sent us this lovely message:
How's that for praise, eh? At least Ĺtorohanga's Council has some self-awareness.
Taxpayer Talk: What are Simon Watts' climate targets costing you? đ°đł
This week on Taxpayer Talk, Peter Williams sits down with our Senior Researcher, Levi Gibbs, to discuss the true cost of New Zealandâs climate targets â and how the Government can get back on a pathway to surplus without raising taxes.
<[link removed]>
In this episode, Levi also previews our upcoming report, Pathway to Surplus, revealing billions in potential savings by cutting wasteful spending, ending corporate welfare, and rethinking welfare spending.
You can listen to the episode on our website <[link removed]>, or on Apple Podcasts <[link removed]>, Spotify <[link removed]>, iHeart Radio <[link removed]> and other good podcast apps.Â
Have a great long weekend and stay safe in this weather.
James Ross
Policy & Public Affairs Manager
New Zealand Taxpayersâ Union
<[link removed]>
In the Media:
Stuff Coalition holds on to power in latest political poll <[link removed]>
HeraldCoalition back on track in polling after months behind Labour <[link removed]>
Waikato TimesACT, NZ First gain support in latest poll, National static <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBCoalition back on track after months behind Labour <[link removed]>
RNZLabour, Te PÄti MÄori lose ground - April Taxpayers Union-Curia poll <[link removed]>
RNZ Â The Panel with Simon Wilson & Denise L'Estrange-Corbet <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBBarry Soper: Senior Political Editor on results of recent political polls <[link removed]>
Otago Daily TimesMayor rejects union claim over new council building costs <[link removed]>
Stuff Nationalâs pollster: Thereâs zero chance of Luxon being rolled. Who could step in if he was? <[link removed]>
Interest A pair of polls show a revival for the embattled governing Coalition <[link removed]>
One News Tiriti activist pressed for details on MÄori Parliament proposal <[link removed]>
Canberra TimesChina threat spurs New Zealand defence spend surge <[link removed]>
531âDavid Seymour, ACT Party Leader <[link removed]>
The PlatformMichael Laws Breaks Down The Latest New Zealand Poll Results <[link removed]>
Herald Most New Zealanders feel âmore safeâ seeing police on beat patrol, exclusive poll results reveal <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBÂ The Huddle: Was the Treaty Principles Bill saga worth all the debate? <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBÂ Â Full Show Podcast <[link removed]>
NZ HeraldMost New Zealanders feel âmore safeâ seeing police on beat patrol, exclusive poll results reveal <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBÂ The Huddle: Was the Treaty Principles Bill saga worth all the debate? <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBÂ Â Full Show Podcast <[link removed]>
Otago Daily TimesExodus of leaders continues <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBÂ Â Full Show Podcast <[link removed]>
Otago Daily Times Taxpayersâ Union shares concerns over museum costs <[link removed]>
The PressKeeping communities safe starts with common sense <[link removed]>
RNZ Reserve Bank's budget to be slashed by 25% <[link removed]>
Interest The central bank has negotiated an increase in its annual average spend <[link removed]>
Newstalk ZBÂ Finance Minister says she's satisfied with balance struck over RBNZ funding <[link removed]>
King Country NewsCouncil hit list refuted <[link removed]>
New Zealand Taxpayers' Union Inc. ¡ 117 Lambton Quay, Level 4, Wellington 6011, New Zealand
This email was sent to
[email protected]. To change your email preferences, click here <[link removed]>.
Authorised by the New Zealand Taxpayers' Union, Level 4, 117 Lambton Quay, Wellington 6011.