📌 View
Online | 🚀 Share
on Facebook
Dear Friend,
As the
country battens down the hatches for Cyclone Tam, your humble
Taxpayers' Union is preparing for a different storm: the economic
implications on New Zealand of the Trump tariffs.
This week,
we also cut to the truth about whether Nicola Willis is spending big
or cutting her cloth, and why she is so annoyed with the Taxpayers'
Union.
We also,
errr, expose Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
bureaucrats for looking at p*rn while at work. Awkward...
But first:
the economy.
The
impending storm clouds - growth forecasts slashed in half
🌩️
Hot of the
press this morning, Infometrics is the first of the major economic
consultancies to put some actual numbers around what everyone agrees
is an uncertain international situation.
The
company says GDP growth for next year will come down from 2.4 percent
to just 1.0 percent. Not good news for the Beehive or anyone
who wants New Zealand to get out of the economic shtook.

Read more
on the Infometrics website here: Economy’s
recovery on ice as trade war hits growth
Friend, all
roads lead back to the need for this year's Budget (just 35 sleeps
away) to go for growth.
New Zealand
needs substantive policy, not
just PR and bumper
sticker solutions.
The
best 'bang for buck' to get a rocket under growth is full capital
expensing: to get businesses investing in the very capital that will
make New Zealand more productive.
To
read more about the merits of the proposal click here.
When the
facts don't fit the political narrative: Nicola Willis takes a swipe
at the Taxpayers' Union 😱
The role of
any good taxpayer advocate is to point out inconvenient fiscal truths.
Sometimes that annoys the politicians – whoever is in Government.
😬
So is the
case with Nicola Willis who likes to position herself as a prudent
fiscal manager. Among other things, she claims to be reigning back the
last Government's excessive spending.

But the facts don't fit the
narrative.
Last year's
Budget (the first delivered by Nicola Willis) spent more than Grant
Robertson's Budget the previous year. That's true for both measuring
it in real (inflation adjusted) terms and as a percentage of the
economy.
But Ms Willis continues to claims she's spending
'less'. How does she square the circle?
You
see Friend, it's all framed up using what was projected using
the earlier budgets.
In
her Budget 2024 speech in Parliament Nicola Willis highlighted
that the final "operating allowance" (that is the term used for new
baseline spending) for Budget 2024 was $3.2 billion, which is below
the $3.5 billion allowance set by the previous government.
Willis
emphasised that this is the lowest allowance in nominal terms since
Budget 2018 and the lowest in real terms since the Sir Bill
English-era. That's all true, but 'reduced' spending, it is
not.
So
let's cut to the facts:
- No
matter how you measure it, Nicola Willis is spending more than Grant Roberson
was actually spending (she's also borrowing at a faster rate
than Robbo!)
- But she is spending less than Grant Robertson
planned to spend.
The
opposition use exactly the same spin trick 😏
This
reliance on forecasting - rather than actual spending – is
the very same trick the opposition use to claim the Government has
'cut' public services. They treat the earlier longer-term forecasts as
if it was real spending, and say that reductions to the size of an
increase is a 'cut'.

Now you
know...
Nicola Willis
says we don't have 'our facts in a row'. Judge for
yourself, ... ⚖️
Last night
on Heather du Plessis-Allan's NewstalkZB show, Nicola Willis gave your
humble Taxpayers' Union a serve, claiming that "not for the first
time, they haven't got their facts quite in a row" referring
to our media release.
 >>Listen
here<<
Rather than
hit back (we've
been called worse!), make up your own mind.
In 2015 –
the Bank's five-year funding was set at $324.3 million. In 2020, it was hiked
up to $639.6 million. Grant Robertson also granted "emergency" top ups
for 2023 and 2024 ($48 million and $30 million,
respectively).
Now it's
time for the next five-year funding round and Willis says she's "cut"
the funding to $775.6 million.

But that
still amounts to a 21 percent hike on the last five-year agreement,
and a 131 percent increase on the one before that.
The
Government would have you believe it’s a funding reduction
because – get this – the Reserve Bank asked for $1.03 billion and
Nicola Willis didn’t quite give them all of it. And, it is a reduction
from the "emergency" funding that Grant Robertson waved through before
exiting the building for his good mate Adrian Orr.
Friend, six
years ago the Reserve Bank had 225 staff. Now it has 660 (not quite
captured by the chart below).
Is
Nicola Willis 'cutting' or just locking-in Grant Robertson's
big-spending legacy? 🔒

It doesn't
bode well for what’s in store in next month’s Budget...
Today's
inflation data: Local council's continue to drive costs of living
pressure 💸
The other
big economic news today is the latest inflation numbers released few
hours ago. It's ticking up, and a big driver is yet again is
the out of control council rates... 🙄
Local rates increases were responsible for 14
percent of the CPI increase.
You
can read our comments to media here.
TAXPAYER
VICTORY! $400m green slush fund gets flushed 🚽☘️
In better
news, Minister for Climate Change Simon Watts has flushed
the $400 million green slush fund known as the NZ Green Investment
Finance Ltd (NZGIF).

NZ Green
Investment Finance Ltd (NZGIF) is
a $400 million green slush fund that blew $115 million on Solar Zero
(a company backed by trillion-dollar BlackRock) and still went
bust.

$280 million in climate handouts were dished out
to big business in last year's Budget, including EV truck subsidies
and “fuel switching” grants. Now it’s up to Nicola Willis to
finish the job in Budget 2025 and put an end to the
subsidies.
With an
emissions trading scheme to reduce emissions already in place – why
are we paying twice? We say the subsidies also need to go to
zero.
Greenwashing lobbyists, you’re on notice. 👊
Money
doesn't grow on trees - unless you're funding a $12 billion defence
plan? 🪖💰
The
Government recently announced a $12 billion plan for Defence
spending. That's not chump change:
it's the equivalent to $6,000 for every
household.
Prime
Minister Luxon told media that “we can afford this,” but
things get a bit murkier when it comes to how. 🤔

Most New Zealanders agree that New Zealand needs
to up its defence. But with no savings flagged
elsewhere how exactly are we to pay for it?
Ironically,
only Australian media
asked this blatantly obvious question. 🤷

The
Government is already borrowing $6,000-per-household per year thanks
to the deficit. The
offical national debt clock is climbing $25 million higher every
day.
That’s not
sustainable – and it's a real threat to New Zealand.
The Finance
Minister has said that the extra $9 billion of new spending will come
entirely from the Government's $2.4 billion yearly spending buffer.
Even if that's true, it means the Government will effectively
be pausing all other new capital spending: i.e. new hospital
equipment, school refurbishments etc.
It just
doesn't add up.
Speaking of
Defence spending, our research team has come across an example of its
spending that probably won't have New Zealand's adversaries shaking in
their boots. Forget tanks, it's Beam scooters!
Marching
round bases is so yesterday: Defence Force's $32,800 Beam
Scooter joyrides 🛴💨
Military
heroes aren't always taxpayer heroes. Thanks
to an anonymous tipper, our investigations team confirmed the Defence
Force has spent $32,800 on e-scooters. For one airforce base!
🚨

Yes -
officials decided it was a good time for our nation's defenders to zip
round on extortionately priced, rent-by-the-second
e-scooters.
Even the
most staunch taxpayer advocate knows we need a strong and capable
Defence Force. But spending money preparing for the invasion
of a skate park isn't it!
PM's
Office caught with their tabs down 😵
It seems
one too many late nights in the Department of the Prime Minister and
Cabinet (DPMC) has left more than a few Cabinet staffers
red-faced.

Some rather diligent digging from the Taxpayers'
Union investigations team revealed 24 recorded 'incidents' of
government personnel trying to access *ahem* adult
entertainment on their work devices.
Now,
Friend, we're all for a little (fiscal) discipline, and we certainly don't object to
burning the midnight oil – but let's all agree there's no place for
bureaucrats to be accessing smut while on the taxpayers'
dime!
Either
these staffers have way too much time on their hands – or not nearly
enough accountability during their work time. Either way, taxpayers
deserve more focus (or perhaps fewer distractions?) from the public
service supporting the PM.
NEW POLL: “Woop! Woop!” – bad news for da'
Greens 🚨
It's been a bad few weeks for the
Greens, who've dug themselves into holes doubling down on
controversies. 👀
Green Police and Corrections
spokesperson Tamatha Paul MP is sticking to her comments that police
made people feel more unsafe, should be defunded, and that
prisons should be abolished.
Embarrassingly for Ms Paul, even her own party's
voters don't agree with her.
The polls
finds that 48 percent of Greens felt safer with more beat
patrols, compared to just 19 percent who felt 'less safe'.
Speaking of
feeling safe, apparently some people are scared of the Taxpayers'
Union...
Ōtorohanga Council's "risk list" - Guess who's
number one 🏆
For local
councils, back in the day it was floods or tsunami that resulted
in claxons blaring, emergency meetings convening, and consultants
paged to come into the office. But now it's the wrong person asking
questions or looking a little too closely at their books. 🚨
A few
months back, we were told that Ōtorohanga District Council has been
running a risk level assessment process that features, well, us!
So
we asked about it, and your humble Taxpayers' Union feature at the
very top of the "Risk Level Assessment" list!

It
seems our student interns asking questions are ranked higher than a
matters that pose a "potential security risk" for the
Council!
Ratepayers
pay the bills, and they should be able to get answers from any council
without getting shoved into the queue to be fobbed off by spin
doctors.
But
wait — here’s the best part.
After we
broke this story, the Council sent us this lovely message:

How's that
for praise, eh? At least Ōtorohanga's Council has some
self-awareness.
Taxpayer
Talk: What are Simon Watts' climate targets costing you?
💰🌳
This week
on Taxpayer Talk, Peter Williams sits down with our Senior
Researcher, Levi Gibbs, to discuss the true cost of New Zealand’s
climate targets – and how the Government can get back on a pathway to
surplus without raising taxes.

In this
episode, Levi also previews our upcoming report, Pathway to
Surplus, revealing billions in potential savings by cutting
wasteful spending, ending corporate welfare, and rethinking welfare
spending.
You can listen to the episode on our website, or
on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeart Radio and other good podcast
apps.
Have a
great long weekend and stay safe in this weather.
 |
 James
Ross Policy & Public Affairs Manager New Zealand
Taxpayers’ Union
|

|