Read the latest in your browser ([link removed])

Dear Friend of Press Freedom,

At a conference last week in Austin, Texas, exiled Russian journalist Mikhail Rubin told the audience how, in hindsight, there was not enough resistance when press rights began going away in his home country.

“We did not resist for the small things,” Rubin said.

After his panel at the International Symposium on Online Journalism, an annual meeting of global journalists, academics and funders, Rubin expanded for me how the Russian government was adept at taking “small steps and normalizing not normal things.”

Years ago, he said, independent journalists like him could follow the president around as a reporter in the Kremlin press pool. Then the Kremlin began to choose who could be close to Russian President Vladimir Putin and who got to travel with him. At some point, Rubin said, he was relegated to watching Putin’s speeches from the press center, via a broadcast conducted by Putin’s personal cameraman.

“The point was to keep independent journalists away from him so we wouldn't ask questions or look around.” This, Rubin knew, was not the reporting he wanted to do.

In this December 2013 file photo, reporters listen to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s speech, displayed on a large TV screen at a press room during a live broadcast in Moscow. AP Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko, file

If that example rings familiar, it’s because I spoke with Rubin on April 27, the same day The Associated Press was back in court for a hearing as it fights its ban from the White House ([link removed]) . Julie Pace, AP’s senior vice president and executive editor, took the stage the next day at ISOJ, saying the hearing was “substantive,” but that she had no sense of a timetable for when the judge would rule.

Within weeks of banning AP, the White House then wrested control of the press pool ([link removed]) from the White House Correspondents’ Association to itself. WHCA president Eugene Daniels, while on a different panel at ISOJ, said he understood why it may not be intuitive to everyone how this is a big deal. But it is.

“At the end of the day,” Daniels said, “The people being covered should not choose the people that are covering them.”

‘We didn’t struggle enough’

Rubin left Moscow in July 2021, after the Russian government declared him a “foreign agent,” and the news site Proekt ([link removed]) , where he’s a deputy editor-in-chief, an “undesirable organization.”

“I live with that we didn’t struggle enough,” he says of the early days of disappearing independent press access to the government.

Rubin said in Russia, they were all waiting for the worst thing to happen before resisting. But, there is no “terrible barrier,” he said. “By the time you realize something is ‘terrible’ you will lose the ability to resist.”

The lesson, he said, is that it’s easier for Americans to fight now, not to wait until the small steps add up. “There’s no reason to wait for something ‘terrible’ to happen.”

He admitted he didn’t know what would happen in the U.S., but that he was hopeful given our long history with freedom of the press enshrined in our Constitution. “I believe in the system,” Rubin said.

Finally, as we were parting, I asked him, given his status, if it was OK to quote directly in this newsletter. Rubin was firm in his response: “If I had wanted to live in fear, I would have stayed in Russia. I didn’t leave to be afraid to talk.”
Press freedom aggressions in the United States, by category, for the first three months of 2025. U.S. Press Freedom Tracker

Other notable updates and incidents

The Tracker’s Denial of Access ([link removed]) category already has five entries, significant in comparison to nine entries for all of 2024. Two of those are from the White House’s “small steps” around press pool access, but we’ve also heard from local journalists who have been turned away, blocked or otherwise disinvited from government events in Minneapolis ([link removed]) , Minnesota; Chicago ([link removed]) , Illinois; and Topeka, Kansas ([link removed]) .

We’ve also captured more than a dozen Chilling Statements ([link removed]) from powerful Trump administration officials ([link removed]) , instigating leak investigations, oversight hearings and the gutting of government-funded news outlets like Voice of America. (In a spot of positive news, a federal judge said March 28 that he would issue a temporary restraining order ([link removed]) , blocking any more efforts to close VOA or its parent company, the U.S. Agency for Global Media.)

Talk to us

If you’re a journalist — or know one — who’s been arrested, attacked, lost access to government events, or had equipment damaged or seized in the course of reporting, tell us about it. Submit an incident report ([link removed]) to the Tracker as we work to gather systematic information about press freedom incidents in the United States.

More in the Tracker

For the latest on press freedom aggressions across the U.S., explore the database ([link removed]) and follow the Tracker on social media — we’re on Bluesky ([link removed]) , X ([link removed]) and Instagram ([link removed]) .

Best,
Kirstin McCudden
Managing Editor, U.S. Press Freedom Tracker
SUSTAIN THE TRACKER TODAY ([link removed])
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

============================================================
Copyright © 2025 Freedom of the Press Foundation, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
Freedom of the Press Foundation
49 Flatbush Ave, #1017
Brooklyn, NY 11217
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.