No images? Click here [link removed]

Weekend Reads

A Standard Missile-3 Block IIA is fired from a vertical launching system on Andersen Air Force Base in Guam as part of Flight Experiment Mission-02. (DVIDS)

Key Takeaways: President Trump’s Iron Dome for America [[link removed]]

President Donald Trump’s executive order to build a next-generation missile defense shield for the United States homeland is a monumental leap for US deterrence policy.

Last year, Hudson’s Rebeccah L. Heinrichs [[link removed]] served on the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States, which recommended that the US “develop and field homeland IAMD [integrated air and missile defense] that can deter and defeat coercive attacks by Russia and China.” In an op-ed with co-commissioner General (Ret.) John Hyten, she argued that space-based capabilities would be crucial for such a system [[link removed]].

Her three main takeaways [[link removed]] from the executive order are below.

Key Insights

1. Missile defense complicates an adversary’s calculations about whether to strike.

If an adversary does decide to strike, an active defense system like the one President Trump’s order stipulates could limit the damage and ensure Washington has credible options to respond and compel the adversary to cease its aggression. Hudson research has recommended building up US missile defense capabilities and breaking from the decades-old views that missile defense is provocative or technically infeasible.

2. The strategy of avoiding an arms race by remaining vulnerable has failed.

Missile defense critics have warned that if the United States breaks from its policy of remaining vulnerable to peer missile strikes, adversaries may also build missile defenses. But Russia and China are already doing this. As the first Trump administration’s Missile Defense Review states, “Russia has retained and upgraded its own missile defense system designed to protect Moscow against a US strike.” Washington’s previous refusal to develop a robust missile defense has not encouraged its adversaries to take a more benign approach. Instead, adversaries have noted US vulnerabilities and have sought to develop military capabilities to increase their advantages at the expense of American security and sovereignty.

3. The US needs to start developing next-generation technologies now.

Space-located sensors and interceptors are the most effective means of neutralizing potential threats, and announcing that the United States is pursuing these capabilities signals to adversaries that Washington will no longer allow them to hold at risk the US homeland at a low cost. Additionally, adversaries will have to consider that the United States may have other technologies and capabilities they do not fully understand. While President Trump’s executive order requires initiating and accelerating technologies that will take time to mature, moving quickly to develop them could bolster the credibility of US deterrence efforts, help restore stability, and increase the chances of maintaining peace between nuclear adversaries.

Read the full brief. [[link removed]]

Quotes may be edited for clarity and length.

Go Deeper

Trump Is Right about an “Iron Dome” Missile Shield for the US Homeland [[link removed]]

In an August 2024 op-ed, Rebeccah Heinrichs [[link removed]] writes that President Trump is right about America needing an “Iron Dome,” which she says is likely shorthand for a comprehensive missile defense system [[link removed]] that upgrades sea- and ground-based systems and adds an interceptor layer in space.

Read here. [[link removed]]

Can an Iron Dome Work for America? [[link removed]]

Aaron MacLean [[link removed]] discusses the history of American missile defense and lays out the potential costs and capabilities of an American Iron Dome on School of War with Tom Karako.

Listen here. [[link removed]]

Relearning Escalation Dynamics to Win the New Cold War [[link removed]]

In an essay compilation edited by Rebeccah Heinrichs [[link removed]], deterrence experts analyze how the rising axis of adversaries uses nuclear coercion to weaken the US. They recommend that Washington complement its offensive weapons with active defenses [[link removed]].

Read here. [[link removed]]

Act Now

Be a part of promoting American leadership and engagement for a secure, free, and prosperous future for us all.

Donate Today [[link removed]] [[link removed]] Share [link removed] Tweet [link removed] Forward [link removed] Hudson Institute

1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Fourth Floor

Washington, D.C. 20004 Preferences [link removed] | Unsubscribe [link removed]