Sweden had a very different approach to COVID-19. Suing Beijing would cause a massive backlash for American interests.

April 21, 2020

Subway Trains ([link removed] )

New York MTA Denied Employees Mask Protection ([link removed] )

By forbidding transit employees from wearing masks on March 6, New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority may have helped the spread of the coronavirus.

- New York MTA Forbade Employees from Protecting Themselves by Wearing Masks ([link removed] )

By Randall O'Toole

GettyImages-1208953647 ([link removed] )

Predictions of COVID-19 Deaths Were Skewed ([link removed] )

It was disingenuous for the White House team to imply–by wrongly comparing epidemic curves from two different models–that mitigation strategies may have saved two million American lives.

- Did Mitigation Save Two Million Lives? ([link removed] )

By Alan Reynolds

MULTIMEDIA

Sweden Response ([link removed] )

Sweden’s Other Path in Confronting the Coronavirus ([link removed] )

Unlike its European neighbors and much of the rest of the world, Sweden has chosen to keep its borders open, permitted most economic activity to continue, and avoided a mandated lockdown in the face of the coronavirus pandemic.

In the video below, Cato senior fellow Johan Norberg explains why Swedish authorities are doing things differently and why their approach may prove more effective than that of other countries in dealing with the health crisis.

- How Sweden Is Responding to the Coronavirus ([link removed] )

Featuring Johan Norberg

Sign Up For Other Cato Newsletters ([link removed] )

SUPPORT CATO ([link removed] )

Facebook ([link removed] )

LinkedIn ([link removed] )

Twitter ([link removed] )

Instagram ([link removed] )

YouTube ([link removed] )

Cato Institute, 1000 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20001, (202) 842-0200

Manage preferences ([link removed] )