Inspiring progress in the fight to restore academic freedom
[link removed]
CounterCurrent:
A Higher Ed Reformer’s Wishlist Turned SB 83
Inspiring progress in the fight to restore academic freedom
CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed]
Category: DEI/State Legislation;
Reading Time: ~4 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------
** Featured Article - NAS Statement on Ohio Higher Education Bill ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Just last week, Ohio State Senator Jerry Cirino introduced Senate Bill 83 ([link removed]) —also known as the Ohio Higher Education Enhancement Act. This is one of many bills introduced across the U.S., both for K–12 and higher education, that are inspired by model legislation drafted ([link removed]) by the National Association of Scholars and the Civics Alliance. In response to SB 83’s introduction, NAS promptly published an enthusiastic endorsement ([link removed]) . SB 83 and our Model Higher Education Code ([link removed]) provide a solid foundation upon which to rebuild Ohio’s colleges and universities, and to fight back against overreach by diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) activists.
SB 83 would prohibit state-funded colleges and universities from requiring diversity statements for promotion, hire, and admissions, and would ban DEI concepts in classrooms and on campus. The bill would also mandate syllabus transparency and further commit to intellectual diversity and institutional neutrality. What’s more, SB 83 would bar what we call neo-segregation, a common practice among many colleges and universities. Such segregation allows for the voluntary—although often encouraged—separation of the student body by race into segregated residence halls, graduations, and clubs.
In a day and age where free speech is a nonstarter in higher education, legislation like SB 83 offers hope for the preservation of American ideals, as well as the restoration of institutional integrity and academic freedom. Beyond the bill’s initiatives to encourage intellectual diversity and institutional neutrality, it also seeks to reform university governance. The bill’s sponsors seek comprehensive evaluations of faculty, especially through post-tenure reviews. And in a blow to China’s soft-power efforts, the bill would prohibit financial support of state institutions from Confucius Institutes or any other subsidiary of the People’s Republic.
In short, if this bill passes, it “will do an extraordinary amount to depoliticize Ohio’s public higher education system, strengthen intellectual diversity, and restore its accountability to Ohio policymakers and citizens ([link removed]) .”
With such sweeping reforms comes fierce opposition. Already, many of higher ed’s special interest groups have let it be known that they won’t allow the legislature to pass this bill without a fight. Such critics often decry the reforms as “anti-intellectual” or even “anti-academic freedom.” This is hard to imagine, since most of the bill is focused on ensuring that special interests play less of a role in the modern university so that governance is returned to those entrusted by the legislature, and therefore the people, to operate the institutions they fund. Perhaps these special interest groups are worried that their ideas won’t be allowed to permeate higher education unchallenged, since the bill requires institutions to report on how well they’ve fulfilled all of its requirements (like commitments to non-discrimination, transparency, intellectual diversity, etc.), and it will impose sanctions for noncompliance.
If more legislation like SB 83 is introduced, we are on a promising path toward the restoration of academic freedom in higher education. This bill really is a higher education reformer’s wishlist, and we hope to see it inspire state legislators across the country.
Until next week.
Kali Jerrard
Communications Associate
National Association of Scholars
Read the Article ([link removed])
For more on Legislation and DEI in American higher education:
[link removed]
February 23, 2023
** Victory for Academic Freedom: Texas Tech Ditches Diversity Statements ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
National Association of Scholars
Texas Tech University has withdrawn its practice of using diversity statements after a Wall Street Journal op-ed.
[link removed]
February 08, 2023
** Academic Freedom, Academic Responsibility, and the Democratic Valence ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Nalven
The DEI industry, as it has evolved within academia, is not simply an alternative perspective—it has become institutionalized and mandatory.
[link removed]
July 05, 2022
** Report: Educating for Citizenship: The Texas Case Study ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
John D. Sailer
This case study examines how Texas universities train students for citizenship and teach American history, government, and civics.
** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.
============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2023 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.
Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
