The Latest News from the Institute for Free Speech March 27, 2023 Click here to subscribe to the Daily Media Update. This is the Daily Media Update published by the Institute for Free Speech. For press inquiries, please contact [email protected]. In the News OpenSecrets: FEC hears testimony on use of campaign funds to cover salaries, health care By Taylor Giorno and Harshawn Ratanpal .....Not all panelists supported expanding regulations on candidate salaries. Institute for Free Speech Chair Brad Smith, a former FEC commissioner from 2000 to 2005, called his support to expand candidate salary regulation in 2002 “a mistake.” Smith said the commission does not have the legal authority to rule campaign contributions can be converted into personal funds and cautioned against opening the door to corruption as a consequence of “feel-good rule-making.” Since federal candidates’ campaign finances are publicly disclosed, candidates paying themselves a salary will “have to answer to their opponents, the public and the press,” Commissioner Ellen Weintraub said in her opening remarks. “Why is it an explicit violation of law to pay one’s rent with campaign funds but acceptable to do so if it was funded under a salary?” FEC Commissioner Allen Dickerson asked, pointing out candidates are expressly prohibited from using campaign funds to pay for mortgages, tuition, clothing and other personal expenses. He told OpenSecrets after the hearing he had not made a decision on the legal or procedural matter, and he encouraged the public to submit additional comments. CNN: Another political hush-money case offers clues to a possible Donald Trump defense By Fredreka Schouten .....Conservative legal commentators long have maintained that it was a stretch to have Cohen plead guilty to a crime in the payoff scheme in the first place. “At the very least, the law is murky about whether paying hush money to a mistress is a ‘campaign expense’ or a personal expense,” Brad Smith, a former Republican member of the Federal Election Commission, wrote in a Washington Post op-ed at the time. The Media Wall Street Journal: Dominion’s Weak Case Against Fox By William P. Barr .....Conservatives shouldn’t try to weaken the actual-malice standard. For the foreseeable future, we will likely be on the wrong side of the culture-setting consensus. Even when accurate, our views are apt to be treated as “misinformation,” as the reaction to the Hunter Biden laptop story aptly demonstrates. There are precious few conservative news outlets as it is. Why make them more vulnerable to the multitude of left-wing plaintiffs’ lawyers? The left should think twice about cheering for Dominion in this case. While the left has more artillery, it also has more targets for defamation cases as left-wing media outlets far outnumber conservative ones. The States People United for Privacy: Virginia Holds Firm on Personal Privacy By Luke Wachob .....Virginia continues to be a hotbed of activity for defenders of free speech and personal privacy. After taking significant strides to improve its laws last year through the passage of the Personal Privacy Protection Act, the 2023 legislative session saw lawmakers once again toy with the idea of massively expanding regulations for political speech by nonprofit advocacy groups and the business community. Fortunately, these proposals did not become law, and the General Assembly adjourned for the year on February 25. Washington Free Beacon: Pennsylvania Dem Threatens To Withhold Funding From University of Pittsburgh Over Conservative Speakers By Aaron Sibarium .....A Pennsylvania lawmaker on Tuesday issued what free speech advocates are calling a veiled threat to withhold funding from the University of Pittsburgh over the school's decision to allow several conservative speakers on campus. ACLU: How Officials in Georgia are Suppressing Political Protest as ‘Domestic Terrorism’ By Sarah Taitz and Shaiba Rather .....Over the past few months, 42 activists have been charged with “domestic terrorism” under Georgia state law. Their acts of “terrorism”? Alleged property damage and trespassing while protesting. These prosecutions exemplify a highly problematic trend of the government — both state and federal — using domestic terrorism powers to punish dissent. Read an article you think we would be interested in? Send it to Tiffany Donnelly at [email protected]. For email filters, the subject of this email will always begin with "Institute for Free Speech Media Update." The Institute for Free Speech is a nonpartisan, nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization that promotes and defends the First Amendment rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government. Please support the Institute's mission by clicking here. For further information, visit www.ifs.org. Follow the Institute for Free Speech ‌ ‌ ‌ The Institute for Free Speech | 1150 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 801, Washington, DC 20036 Unsubscribe [email protected] Update Profile | Constant Contact Data Notice Sent by [email protected]