From Office of TX Attorney General <[email protected]>
Subject Paxton Files Amicus to Ensure that Unelected Entities Do Not Exercise Undue Influence Over Dallas Citizens
Date March 23, 2023 1:52 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Seal________________________________________________________________________




*FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE*

March 23, 2023

www.texasattorneygeneral.gov




*PRESS OFFICE: (512) 463-2050*

[email protected]





?

*Paxton Files Amicus to Ensure that Unelected Entities Do Not Exercise Undue Influence Over Dallas Citizens?*

?

AUSTIN ??Attorney General Paxton filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of Texas to roll back powers that were unlawfully granted to an unelected body that oversees Dallas?s municipal employees? retirement fund.?

??

In accordance with state law, the Dallas City Council established by ordinance the Employees? Retirement Fund of the City of Dallas (?ERF?). However, in violation of the Texas Constitution, the ordinance has a provision that any changes to the code governing the ERF must be approved by the ERF?s board of trustees. This functionally gave an unelected body of seven individuals veto power that is neither warranted nor lawful.??

??

The issue came to a head when the City attempted to impose term limits on board members. The ERF board, comprised of unelected individuals, improperly maintained that the City required their approval to do so. The ERF board then sued, arguing that the limits are unlawful amendments that the board does not approve.??

??

The amicus brief was filed to outline that the earlier delegation of veto power to an unelected body such as the ERF board conflicts with the Texas Constitution and should be reversed.??

??

The amicus brief concludes: ?In sum, ERF has pointed to no clear statement from the Legislature giving the city council the extraordinary power to bind its hands regarding the structure of its pension plan (or anything else relevant to this case). In the absence of such a clear statement, the Court should conclude that no such power exists, that Dallas?s current city council may amend the acts of its predecessors, and that the term limits imposed on ERF?s board are valid.??

?

To read the full amicus brief, click here [ [link removed] ].??

? ?

###







Stay Connected with Office of Texas Attorney General on
Facebook [ [link removed] ]?-?Twitter [ [link removed] ]?-?Instagram [ [link removed] ]?-?Email [ [link removed] ]

?Update your subscriptions, modify your password or email address, or stop subscriptions at any time on your Subscriber Preferences Page [ [link removed] ]. You will need to use your email address to log in. If you have questions or problems with the subscription service, please visit subscriberhelp.govdelivery.com [ [link removed] ].


________________________________________________________________________

This email was sent to [email protected] using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: Office of Texas Attorney General ?300 W. 15th Street?? Austin, TX?78701 GovDelivery logo [ [link removed] ]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis