From Office of TX Attorney General <[email protected]>
Subject Paxton Petitions Texas Supreme Court to Reverse Lower Court’s Decision in Case Determining Child Custody
Date March 22, 2023 1:59 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Seal________________________________________________________________________




*FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE*

March 22, 2023

www.texasattorneygeneral.gov




*PRESS OFFICE: (512) 463-2050*

[email protected]





?

*Paxton Petitions Texas Supreme Court to Reverse Lower Court?s Decision in Case Determining Child Custody?*

?

AUSTIN ??Attorney General Paxton filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of Texas to ensure appropriate custody decisions are made on behalf of Texas children and to ensure that Texas appellate courts review legal judgments correctly and uniformly.??

?

The case involves a determination of whether four children should live primarily with their mother or with their father. In these cases, among other considerations, a pertinent factor is ?the desires of the child.? The Texas Family Code states that trial courts ?shall? interview a child who is at least twelve years old to determine the child?s wishes. The couple?s oldest child was twelve years old, but the trial court failed to conduct an "in camera "interview, despite the mother?s request.???

?

The Dallas-based Fifth Court of Appeals recognized that the trial court was wrong to refuse to interview the child, but the Court misapplied the harmless-error doctrine and incorrectly ruled that the failure to conduct an "in camera" interview did not cause any harm.??

?

The Supreme Court of Texas should reverse the court of appeals? judgment, affirm the rights of children to have their voices heard in these sensitive matters, and ensure that the harmless-error doctrine is uniformly applied throughout Texas?s legal system.?

?

The amicus brief states: ?The State agrees with Petitioner that the trial court erred. And because the trial court?s error means the substance and significance of M.N.?s "in camera "interview is unknown, the error prevents the appellate courts from assessing whether the error likely affected the judgment?the best-interests determination. In finding the error harmless, the court of appeals misapplied the harmless-error doctrine. Its judgment should be reversed.??

?

To read the full amicus brief, click here [ [link removed] ].??

? ?

###







Stay Connected with Office of Texas Attorney General on
Facebook [ [link removed] ]?-?Twitter [ [link removed] ]?-?Instagram [ [link removed] ]?-?Email [ [link removed] ]

?Update your subscriptions, modify your password or email address, or stop subscriptions at any time on your Subscriber Preferences Page [ [link removed] ]. You will need to use your email address to log in. If you have questions or problems with the subscription service, please visit subscriberhelp.govdelivery.com [ [link removed] ].


________________________________________________________________________

This email was sent to using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: Office of Texas Attorney General ?300 W. 15th Street?? Austin, TX?78701 GovDelivery logo [ [link removed] ]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis