View this email in your browser

“Everyone is welcome in the pro-life community. We seek to ensure that all people have the chance to be born and find their community." —Catherine Glenn Foster, President & CEO of Americans United for Life
 

CONTRIBUTE

March for Life was also a model of intersectionality
(Washington Examiner) The tired caricature of the pro-life movement as exclusively religious, led by men, and heterosexually normative is more out of date than the 2007 Blackberry Curve. All you have to do is to look at the leadership of the cause for life. It couldn't be any clearer that the energy is young and diverse.

For the Love of Roe
(National Review) Whether they are pro-life or simply less pro-abortion than the Democratic party, most Americans oppose Roe’s legacy. This is why abortion-rights proponents have amped up their rhetoric and activism during Trump’s presidency, afraid that his judges might undo cases fabricating the supposed right they hold so dear.

March for Life activists credit Trump with wholeheartedly embracing their agenda
(The Washington Post) Catherine Glenn Foster, president of Americans United for Life, said the president immediately endeared himself to the movement upon taking office in 2017 by reinstating and broadening the so-called Mexico City policy, which bans U.S. funding for foreign organizations that perform or actively promote abortion. “It’s such a strong precedent that he would take life as one of his very first issues,” Foster said. “To say we have someone in our corner is so powerful.”
 

Listen and subscribe

Americans United for Life presents "Life, Liberty, and Law", a weekly podcast featuring conversations on the human right to life.

As March for Life kicks off, pro-life women are fighting to redefine female 'empowerment'
(Fox News) But the pro-life movement today is fighting back against that narrative through leaders like Lila Rose of Live Action, Catherine Glenn Foster of Americans United for Life (AUL), and Marjorie Dannenfelser of Susan B. Anthony List.

Does opposing abortion mean you should boycott Starbucks? Some advocates say yes.
(The Washington Post) Catherine Glenn Foster, president of Americans United for Life, compared the new insurance rule to the provisions for conscientious objectors in wartime: “The country may still go to war, but your conscience is clear. You’re not holding a gun.” She said that while she is reluctant to endorse boycotts that do not fit into the lives of many busy parents, she avoids certain fast-food chains because of abortion or other issues. “I literally lost my appetite for it,” she said, adding, “It’s not that I’m trying to specifically impact policy. I just don’t want to be part of it.”

‘This amendment would eliminate government’s ability to regulate abortion and protect life’
(Manchester Ink & Link) “This is about abortion on demand,” Katie Glenn, government affairs counsel for Americans United for Life, told judiciary committee members. She said similar legislation has been used to tear down government requirements for abortion clinics. “This amendment would eliminate government’s ability to regulate abortion and protect life,” Glenn said.
 

CONTRIBUTE

Americans United for Life works toward the day when all are welcomed throughout life and protected in law! Please consider supporting our mission of service.

Copyright © Americans United for Life, All Rights Reserved.
You are receiving this as a supporter of Americans United for Life, having opted in on our website or at our events.

Americans United for Life
1150 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 500
Washington, DC 20036

Add us to your address book


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.