Having trouble viewing this email?? [ [link removed] ]View it as a Web page [ [link removed] ].
Bennett
Hello Friends,
?
The legislature was in full action again this week with committees very busy with one committee deadline just passing and another looming in the near future. Below are a few updates for the week on the issue of education.?
?
*SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER BILL CONTINUES MOVEMENT*
I am very happy to share with you that my special education teacher pipeline grant program bill received a second hearing this week, this time in the Education Finance Committee.??As I mentioned a few weeks ago, this legislation would provide grants to schools throughout the state that desire to partner with teacher preparation programs to help finance and ?grow? local paraprofessionals, other unlicensed staff, and tier 1 and 2 teachers to become fully licensed special education teachers.??This is a bill that came from local input and worked with area schools to write.??I am delighted to see this legislation continue movement through the committee process, and also that it now has bipartisan support.
?
*CONCERNING EDUCATION BILLS*
There have been a number of education bills working their way through our House education committees over the last number of weeks that have concerned me greatly. Two of them were heard in one of my committees this week. Both of these are repeat Democrat-only authored bills which also saw hearings two years ago in the Minnesota Legislature but did not make it into law.?
?
The first?bill is an ethnic studies requirement for our schoolchildren and schools. Like two years ago, this legislation would mandate that all students successfully complete a semester-long ?ethnic studies? course to graduate from high school. It also requires that ethnic studies must be taught in elementary, middle, and charter schools.?The only problem is, this is not the ?ethnic studies? that most people think of when they hear this term.?
?
When?most of us think about ethnic studies, we think about studying?and learning about?the differences and similarities of?other cultures,?their histories, perspectives, etc. ? and that would include serious discussions about the evils of racism.?
?
I think all of us?would agree?that?ethnic studies like this?is important to having healthy relationships with our neighbors, both here in Minnesota and?throughout?the world.?This is already required?instruction?in our current?Minnesota?social studies standards.
?
The?ethnic studies referred to in?this bill,?however,?has a?very?different definition: ?Ethnic studies analyzes the ways in which race and racism have been and continue to be powerful social, cultural, and political forces, and the connection of race to other groups of stratification, including gender, class, sexuality, and legal status.?
?
This?ethnic studies bill would also require the Department of Education to hire ?dedicated ethnic studies staff? who?s job in part would be to monitor schools and ensure compliance, as well as develop ?a model ethnic studies curriculum? for school districts to use. The model curriculum must also include ?a power, race, class, and gender analysis? and ?an intersectional analysis of climate, health, food, housing, education, and policy.?
?
This bill is ethnic studies on overdrive and seems designed to push a particular political ideology into the classroom rather than teaching understanding of other peoples and cultures.?
?
A?second bill heard this week would require ?climate justice? instruction for all students in grades 1 ? 12.??According to the bill,??climate justice?means a framework that puts people first and views the effects of climate change as interconnected with forms of oppression connecting climate change to social and economic justice issues.???
?
I am all for teaching our children about taking good care of our environment. Again, most people would agree with that. However, this bill goes over the top. It goes beyond teaching about environmental care, or even climate change, and teaches about political ideals like ?social justice? and climate change interconnected ?forms of oppression.? These are political ideologies that do not belong in the classroom.?
?
Forcing?politically charged?mandates like these on?Minnesota schools?concerns me?because?they?will end up pitting?parents against teachers?and school boards.?Parents, teachers, and school boards?don?t want,?nor?do they?need,?this added tension?in our schools.
?
I?hear from many teachers. They don?t want to be social justice warriors or political activists;?they simply want to teach their students.?We need to stop?pitting teachers against parents.?Mandates like these are one reason we?re losing so many teachers.?
?
My opinion:??With half of our students in Minnesota below level in both reading and math, our main focus in the Legislature and in our schools should be on improving these core academic subjects ? not on gobbling up precious classroom time teaching political ideologies to our children. I have seen very few bills heard this year with this academic focus, and that concerns me greatly too.?
?
Have a good weekend!
?
Peggy
Facebook Logo
?
/reppeggybennett
307 State Office Bldg.
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651-296-8216
[email protected]
________________________________________________________________________
Update your subscriptions, modify your password or email address, or stop subscriptions at any time on your Subscriber Preferences Page [ [link removed] ]. You will need to use your email address to log in. If you have questions or problems with the subscription service, please visit subscriberhelp.govdelivery.com [ [link removed] ].
This service is provided to you at no charge by Minnesota House GOP [ [link removed] ].
________________________________________________________________________
This email was sent to
[email protected] using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: Minnesota House GOP ? 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. ? Saint Paul, MN 55155 GovDelivery logo [ [link removed] ]
