[The real struggle must not be reduced to dichotomies that speak
to people’s emotions, but rather found in the structural causes that
allow a small segment of humanity to exploit and enrich itself on the
backs of billions of “others,” and to self-attribute to itself a
sense of moral superiority.]
[[link removed]]

THE ‘GARDEN’ AND THE ‘JUNGLE’: WHY THE US VS. THEM NARRATIVE
IS A LIE  
[[link removed]]


 

Lorenzo Kamel
March 8, 2023
Il Manifesto Global
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ The real struggle must not be reduced to dichotomies that speak to
people’s emotions, but rather found in the structural causes that
allow a small segment of humanity to exploit and enrich itself on the
backs of billions of “others,” and to self-attribute to itself a
sense of moral superiority. _

,

 

The dichotomy that pits the “democratic West” against the
despotisms of “others” is repeated daily, in different forms and
ways, by a large part of Italian media, as well as by a number of
academics.

It is a reassuring narrative, well-received at the political level as
well, which has the defect of ignoring too much history, as well as
calling to mind Josep Borrell’s “gardens”: “Europe is a
garden,” the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs recently
said, “the rest of the world a jungle.”

There is no doubt that those that are claimed to be “Western
values” guarantee tangible and real rights and benefits to the
citizens of large parts of North America and Europe, although numerous
ethnic and/or religious minorities, as well as certain sections of
society, are structurally discriminated against and/or poorly
protected.

We are talking, however, about a small percentage of the world’s
population (about 16 percent of the total), which includes Italy, a
country often subject to external interference, where there are at
least 59 military bases run to all intents and purposes by Washington
(with 13,000 soldiers), including those at Aviano and Ghedi: they
enjoy a status as quasi-foreign territory and house at least 70
nuclear bombs.

In the eyes of a large percentage of the rest of the world, the
“Western values” and the U.S.-led system of international
relations bring them no benefit.

On the contrary: from their vantage point, the cliché of the
democratic West often continues to mean, in practice, invasions (not
infrequently implemented to defend specific “spheres of
influence”), arms trade (more than 70 percent of the world’s
weapons are produced by Western countries), exploitation of raw
materials (see, among dozens of other examples, the case of the
Democratic Republic of Congo), pollution (for instance, a country like
Sri Lanka, whose life expectancy is very similar to that of the United
States, uses about 88 percent fewer resources than the United States
and emits about 94 percent fewer emissions on a per capita basis),
sanctions (which hurt civilians and almost never actually affect the
regimes considered “undesirable” by the West) and much more.

Evaluating “Western democracy” exclusively by looking at the
United States and the countries that receive benefits (more or less
substantial) from the Washington-led system of international relations
is a mirror of an ideological solipsism that denies the scars, rights
and history of billions of human beings considered “other” than
“us.”

Focusing only on the wealth of the countries that make up the
“European garden” or that of the “home of democracy” (the
United States) is a useful shortcut that also ignores multiple
dynamics rooted in the present.

The international system that allows some countries – those who join
organizations such as NATO, for example – to enrich themselves
through control of the economies and natural resources of a large part
of those same human beings who are considered “other” than
“us,” represents in this sense the antithesis of the principles
underlying any fully-developed democracy.

And this is visible as much on a state level (as an example, there are
more than 800 U.S. military bases in more than 80 countries around the
world) as it is at a more micro-economic level.

Among much else, evidence of this is the fact that earnings from
natural resources (oil, gold, gas, etc.) found in almost all African
countries and a significant number of eastern Mediterranean states are
still transferred through offshore companies that, to a large extent,
are linked to companies and businessmen operating in Europe and
America.

As the documents that have been made public in the Panama Papers
scandal showed – dramatized in 2019 in the film with the same name
directed by Steven Soderbergh – more than 1,400 anonymous companies,
connected to multiple tax havens, are being used to drain the natural
wealth of some of the richest countries (in terms of natural and human
resources) which are at the same time among the poorest in the world
(due, primarily, to connivance between corrupt local elites and
Western states and businessmen).

When something is cast as the eternal war between “Good and Evil,”
often the only one that wins is war itself. In our times, the real
struggle must not be reduced to the easy dichotomies that speak to
people’s emotions (and thus instincts), but rather found in the
structural and enduring causes that allow a small segment of humanity
to exploit and enrich itself on the backs of billions of “others,”
and to self-attribute to itself a sense of moral superiority justified
exclusively by looking at their own “backyard.”

_Lorenzo Kamel Professor of Contemporary History at the University of
Turin._

* Europe
[[link removed]]
* Panama Papers
[[link removed]]
* NATO
[[link removed]]
* Global Inequality
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]

Manage subscription
[[link removed]]

Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]