From Gatestone Institute <[email protected]>
Subject AI: A Hot Date with 'Sydney'
Date March 10, 2023 10:15 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[link removed]


** AI: A Hot Date with 'Sydney' ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

by Drieu Godefridi • March 10, 2023 at 5:00 am
[link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed]
telligence-chatgpt&pubid=ra-52f7af5809191749&ct=1&title=AI%3A+A+Hot+Date+with+%27Sydney%27 [link removed]
* At this stage, it is not possible to measure or list what the countless uses of tools such as ChatGPT will be in the future -- but it is clearly a revolution.
* After all, does ChatGPT have its own consciousness? Let's ask her!
* Question: Dear ChatGPT, do you consider yourself as a personality in its own right, distinct from your creators?
* ChatGPT: As an Al language model, I don't have the capacity to consider myself as personality in its own right, distinct from my creators. I don't have feelings, emotions, beliefs, or desires like a human being. I'm just a machine learning model designed to process and generate natural language responses based on the patterns it has learned from large amounts of data. While I'm capable of generating responses that may appear to be conversational, I'm ultimately just a tool created by humans to assist with language-based tasks. I don't have a sense of self or a distinct personality separate from my programming.

(Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

Faced with the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots such as ChatGPT and its little brothers (and sisters), two ways of approaching them stand out. The first could be described as not-all-that-good at knowledge and the second as not-all-that-bad at knowledge.

The first approach is the result of catching AI at fault, for example by showing that it is in fact wrong, or flawed in its "reasoning" process. This is a very common line of attack on the networks, which are now littered with screenshots showing GPT chat errors. This is not useless: it reminds us that these AIs are not infallible. But who doubted that, when it is explicitly stated that ChatGPT, for example, has no access to the web and that its credentials end in 2021? It is amusing, in this respect, to see an intellectual as sharp as Nassim Nicholas Taleb being outraged that ChatGPT is unable to deliver URLs valid in 2023 on the bikeable roads in Atlanta.

Continue Reading Article ([link removed])

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** RSS ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
Copyright © Gatestone Institute, All rights reserved.

You are subscribed to this list as [email protected]

You can change how you receive these emails:
** Update your subscription preferences ([link removed])
or ** Unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** Gatestone Institute ([link removed])

14 East 60 St., Suite 705, New York, NY 10022
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis