From Sandy Smith <[email protected]>
Subject In defense of Voter ID
Date March 9, 2023 12:00 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Let's make it permanent

[link removed]

Dear John,

The NC Supreme Court will be reconsidering soon the Constitutional Amendment to the NC Constitution, mandating voter ID.

This amendment passed with overwhelming support. The NC Supremes invalidated it based on MSNBC leftist conspiracy theory.

I think it's important- that's why I want a Constitutional Amendment on a Federal level to mandate it ([link removed]) . So let's debunk the arguments against Voter ID.

This is Sandy Smith from NC's First District- and I am trying to secure our elections through Federal action!

John Hood wrote a great defense of Voter ID in the Carolina Journal. I think a few passages are especially important.
[link removed]
Voter ID should be mandatory! ([link removed])
North Carolinians want their election laws to include a photo ID requirement. They’ve made this clear many times. In 2018, a large majority of voters chose to add such a requirement to the state constitution.

Critics of voter ID know full well they represent a small minority of North Carolinians. They don’t care. Defining the policy as “voter suppression,” they proclaim it a waste of resources and a violation of the civil right to cast a ballot.

They are wrong about that. They are wrong at every level of analysis.

Voter ID doesn’t suppress the vote, for starters. Most scholarly studies of voter ID conclude that it has little to no effect on turnout in general, or on variations in turnout among partisan, racial, or ethnic groups. For example, a 2019 paper in the Atlantic Economic Journal found “no evidence that strict identification laws affect overall turnout or black turnout” and found a small reduction in Hispanic turnout only within one version of the authors’ model.

Nor is voter ID intended to suppress legal votes. Most states and many foreign countries employ some version of the safeguard, including most European democracies.

Besides, the best case for voter ID isn’t about impersonation. It’s about residency. A just-released study by scholars at the University of California-San Diego and the University of Alberta estimated that some 6.1 million Americans are registered to vote in more than one state.

THAT is why we need Voter ID. THAT is why it should be an amendment to the NC Constitution, and why I am trying to make it part of my Amendment to the US Constitution.

Help me make a BIG case for Voter ID! ([link removed])

The important thing is, we will not settle this issue once and for all without a Federal Constitutional Amendment. And as a Congresswoman, I will be able to introduce the Amendment and champion it through the House.

Will you pitch in to help me? I'm the first one to try this effort for Voter ID. We can make history together! ([link removed])

For God and Country,
[link removed]
Sandy Smith
Republican for Congress, North Carolina
Conservative America First Patriot
Entrepreneur & Military mom
[link removed]
P.S. I WILL get attacked by the Swamp, because they fear me. Can you help me fight them and win? ([link removed])


PAID FOR BY SANDY SMITH FOR CONGRESS, INC

============================================================
Copyright © 2023 Sandy Smith for Congress, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
Sandy Smith for Congress
1444 Jeffreys Rd
Suite 123
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
USA

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis