From Michigan Department of Attorney General <[email protected]>
Subject Michigan Attorneys Win Law Review Award for Civil Rights Brief
Date March 6, 2023 9:08 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Nessel Email Header




*FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:*

March 6, 2023




*Media Contact:
*AG Press <[email protected]>






Michigan Attorneys Win Law Review Award for Civil Rights Brief





*LANSING* – Four attorneys from the Michigan Attorney General’s office were recently honored with a Distinguished Brief Award from the 37th Annual Western Michigan University (WMU) Thomas M. Cooley Law Review. The Award was presented at a remote ceremony on March 3rd, where Michigan Supreme Court Justice Richard Bernstein was the keynote speaker and members of the judiciary were present. 

“I’m incredibly proud of our attorneys who worked collaboratively on this award-winning brief,” said Nessel. “This recognition demonstrates the power of good legal briefing and how impactful it can be in shaping the law. I can honestly say that my office has some of the best attorneys in the country. They show their dedication to the people of this state each and every day. Their brief was instrumental to our victory.” 

The attorneys receiving this award were Solicitor General Ann Sherman, Assistant Solicitor General Chris Allen, and Assistant Attorneys General Kyla Barranco and Tonya Jeter. 

These attorneys drafted the Michigan Supreme Court brief in the "Rouch World, LLC v. Department of Civil Rights "case decided in July 2022. The brief argued that the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act’s prohibition of discrimination “because of . . . sex” necessarily encompassed sexual-orientation discrimination because those concepts are intertwined. By simple logic, one cannot define a person’s sexual orientation without knowing that person’s sex, so any adverse action on account of a person’s sexual orientation implicates their sex, and thus the Michigan statute’s protections.” 

The brief also pointed to the U.S. Supreme Court’s analysis in "Bostock v Clayton Co.", 140 S Ct 1731 (2020), which held that the identical statutory phrase in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act encompassed sexual orientation discrimination. The Michigan Supreme Court agreed, holding that “[d]iscrimination on the basis of sexual orientation necessarily constitutes discrimination because of sex” and is a violation of the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act’s protections. 

The panel involved in selecting the brief for this prestigious award was comprised of Michigan Supreme Court Justice Megan K. Cavanagh, Michigan Supreme Court Justice Elizabeth M. Welch, Judge Amy Ronayne Krause, Judge Anica Letica, Judge Michelle M. Rick, Judge Michael J. Riordan, Judge Rosemarie Aquilina, and WMU-Cooley Professor Christi Henke.  

###






AG logo [ [link removed] ]





*Media Inquiries* <[email protected]>




*Latest Releases* [ [link removed] ]




*File a Complaint* [ [link removed] ]







________________________________________________________________________

Michigan Department of the Attorney General   Questions?
  Contact Us [ [link removed] ]

STAY CONNECTED: Visit us on Facebook [ [link removed] ] Visit us on Twitter [ [link removed] ] YouTube [ [link removed] ] Sign up for email updates [ [link removed] ]  

Bookmark and Share [ [link removed] ]

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES:
Manage Preferences [ [link removed] ]  | Help [ [link removed] ]

________________________________________________________________________

This email was sent to [email protected] using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: Michigan Attorney General · G. Mennen Williams Building, 7th Floor · 525 W. Ottawa St., P.O. Box 30212 · Lansing, MI 48909 · 517-373-1100
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis