Dear Supporter,
Ardern slams the door on scrutiny
At the Labour Party's annual retreat yesterday, Jacinda Ardern
announced to waiting media that her Party would
uphold “fiscal transparency” during this year’s election.
She then let slip that she has scrapped her promised policy
costings unit within Treasury.
That's right! The unit, promised to voters last year, would have
independently calculated the cost of 2020 election promises from each
political party. Instead, Labour will now engage a pet private firm to
cost the Party’s own policies.
This firm will have a vested interest in making the Labour
Party look good. This is not fiscal transparency – it’s a cop
out.
As a result of the Prime Minister’s u-turn, it looks like
the Taxpayers’ Union will have to re-boot the popular ‘Bribe-O-Meter’
– our election policy cost tracker where independent economist
critique policy costings and compile the total costs of each party's
election manifestos.
Watch this space.
Why hasn't the Prime Minister challenged Shane
Jones's behaviour?
In April, a forestry company applied for a $15 million grant
from Shane Jones's Provincial Growth Fund.
The company in question has multiple connections to New
Zealand First – its directors include Winston Peters' lawyer, and his
partner.
Shane Jones even met with the company before they applied for
the grant. So why did he wait until October to declare
his conflict of interest? In fact, the conflict was only
declared the very same day RNZ started asking questions of the
Minister's office. So much for transparency.
This is turning into an absolute farce. As our
Executive Director Jordan Williams told
the NZ Herald:
It's time the Prime Minister
stepped in or appointed someone to get to the truth of the matter.
Taxpayers need confidence that the whole process isn't an old boys'
slush fund.
The Remuneration Authority thinks it can discredit us
Last week, we slammed the Remuneration Authority's increased pay
packet for West Coast Regional Council, which saw some councillors
receive pay
hikes of 41 percent.
A few days later, Authority Chair Fran Wilde released a
very tetchy press statement saying that we were "grizzling", that
we'd got it wrong, that funding for salaries had only increased by 11
percent, and that the reason some councillors recieved a 41 percent
pay hike was because, until now, councils didn't have to use all of
the funding.
We say this is a pathetic attempt by the Authority to shirk
responsibility. The Authority sets the parameters for council
pay, and is responsible for the change in formula and rules that
resulted in such large pay rises.
The Remuneration Authority is one of the very few public
agencies not accountable under freedom of information law. Chaired by
a career politician, the Authority’s formulas and methodology are
secret. No wonder they hate scrutiny.
The Authority has, however, agreed to meet with
us. We'll be challenging them to explain why they think
these sorts of cumulative annual pay hikes across local government are
justified.
Why are taxpayers funding astrology?
In a
comment to Stuff, the Ministry of Health says it is
encouraging its Healthy Families providers to incorporate ‘maramataka’
into their services. Maramataka is the traditional study of lunar
cycles.
The Ministry explains: “The work of Healthy
Families NZ is part of the growing movement to place indigenous
knowledge and practices on an equal level with western
epistemologies.”
An example of this put into practice can be found on the
Healthy Families website
for Whanganui:
Healthy Families WRR are
working with others in the community to bring back some of those
practices that kept us connected and healthy.
One easy way that we can do
this is by adjusting our activity levels according to the energy
levels and pull of the moon. Everything has an ebb and a flow,
including us, so by allowing ourselves to rest during the low energy
phases and amping it up on the high energy phases we are placing
ourselves in a position for optimum benefits.
A brief search reveals this belief system is also promoted by
Healthy Families in Rotorua, Waitakere,
and the Far
North.
The Healthy Families programme costs taxpayers around $9
million a year, and also
advocates herbal remedies, massage, and prayer.
This approach to Māori health is not just ineffective, but actively
harmful. There’s a risk that ill families will see these traditional
techniques as a substitute for scientifically-backed measures.
Moreover, every health dollar that is spent on astrology is a dollar
that cannot be invested in core health services.
This programme also blurs the line between healthcare and
religion. It might be well-meaning, but it’s certainly not
value for money for the taxpayer and should be scrapped
immediately.
A new piece of art for the Beehive?
Parliament has decided it wants a large new artwork in the Beehive
entrance. The gimmick: they're asking
for designs from the public.
Yesterday we made our submission:
If our piece is chosen, we will save taxpayers money by
refusing the $15,000 commission payment.
Our idea serves as a warning to would-be money-wasters in the heart
of government. As we told Parliament's Artworks Committee:
For those New Zealanders not lucky
enough to earn a politician’s salary, a five dollar note represents a
meal, or the bus fare for a job interview. That small sheet of
polypropylene can be the difference between hunger and happiness,
poverty and opportunity.
Taxpayers understand the value of
money, because they work for it. But too often, politicians take money
from us only to fritter it away on pet projects, political fads, and
minor extravagances. The taxpaying public can never be too firm in its
opposition to government waste. It is in this spirit that we submit
our proposal.
You can make your own submission by emailing [email protected] before
29 January.
If you copy in our address ([email protected]), we'll
choose our favourite ideas and share them on our Facebook
page.
Have a great weekend.
|
Louis
Houlbrooke Communications Officer New Zealand
Taxpayers' Union
|
|