JUST IN: @ENERGY @FBI & most Americans agree that the tax-funded Wuhan animal lab caused the pandemic! ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌View this email in your browser [[link removed]]

To stop taxpayer-funded animal experiments, we must first stop wasteful
government spending. To receive fewer emails from White Coat Waste Project,
please adjust your preferences
[[link removed]] .


[[link removed]]

Taxpayer, THANK YOU for helping us fully fund our new
#BeagleGate investigation!

Now we’re prepared to expose and close the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) atrocious sandfly lab. We’ll fight to get justice
for the 12 pet dogs who were abandoned and eaten alive. We will not abandon this investigation!

With your support, we do pretty big things. See today’s headlines? The WCW Project launched the biggest story in the world: how the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) funded the Wuhan lab.

JUST IN: The FBI and President Biden’s Dept. of Energy now AGREE with us: animal
experiments likely caused the lab leak and pandemic.

Make no mistake: the Wuhan Lab is an animal lab.
[[link removed]]

That’s why I’m sharing this great BuzzFeed News piece. Here’s how YOU helped us
first expose—and end—U.S. government payouts for animal testing at the Wuhan
lab.

Thanks,

Anthony Bellotti

President & Founder

White Coat Waste Project


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[link removed]]
[[link removed]]

As much of the United States entered COVID lockdowns in April 2020, a tiny group
that campaigns against federal funding for animal experiments spotted an
opportunity.

Speculation was swirling in right-leaning media that the virus behind the
pandemic had emerged from a lab in Wuhan, China, rather than from wildlife sold
for food in the city’s markets. As it happened, the White Coat Waste Project had
been looking into taxpayer money going to labs in China, including in Wuhan. The
group’s founder had strong contacts with Republican politicians and had launched
the group with the mission of getting conservatives into animal activism.

The White Coat Waste Project sprung into action, persuading DailyMail.com to run
a story saying the US government had funded the lab. Then all hell broke loose.

Then-president Donald Trump, keen to blame China for the pandemic, was soon
involved. After prodding from the conservative outlet Newsmax at a press
conference, his administration terminated the grant from the National Institutes
of Health, which had been awarded to a New York–based nonprofit called the
EcoHealth Alliance.


[[link removed]]

Since then, the controversy over whether the COVID pandemic started with a “lab
leak” has escalated into a ferocious fight, with conflicting narratives that
paint EcoHealth and the Wuhan Institute of Virology either as out-of-control
scientists who may have caused the pandemic through inherently risky research or
as the victims of politically motivated conspiracy theories, unfairly vilified
as the architects of a catastrophe that they worked for years to prevent by
studying the risks posed by bat coronaviruses.

Two years on, and with the scientific trail going cold, it’s possible that the
mystery of the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, may never
be conclusively solved. But thousands of pages of NIH emails and other documents
released to BuzzFeed News through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit show how
the White Coat Waste Project rode the wave of partisan pandemic politics to
serve its cause, and in the process triggered a storm that engulfed EcoHealth,
one of the world’s largest groups studying potentially dangerous animal viruses.
They also show how the NIH, a behemoth that spends more than $40 billion annually on biomedical
research, stumbled under the political pressure the White Coat Waste Project
brought to bear.

The White Coat Waste Project has subsequently channeled right-wing anger toward
Anthony Fauci, the public face of COVID policies including mask and vaccine
mandates, accusing his National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,
which is part of the NIH, of funding “beagle torture.” The White Coat Waste Project is writing a controversial new activist playbook —
and it’s unclear whether anyone can control the forces that it has helped to
unleash.


[[link removed]]

“They jumped on the bandwagon of how I have become public enemy number one of
the far right,” Fauci told BuzzFeed News. “If you engage and try and push back
on that, it very often only gives it legs. And then it becomes even worse of a
problem.”


[[link removed]] Anthony Bellotti
White Coat Waste via YouTube / Via youtube.com

The White Coat Waste Project was formed in 2013 by Anthony Bellotti, a campaign consultant who over the
years had worked for Republican candidates including Arnold Schwarzenegger and
Lisa Murkowski, and on efforts to defund Planned Parenthood and Obamacare. But Bellotti’s real passion had long been animal protection, he told BuzzFeed
News — an interest forged at the age of 17 when he worked as a summer intern in
a lab doing research on pigs, studying ways to extend the time they could be
kept under anesthesia during heart surgery. Bellotti said he was struck both by
the animals’ suffering and the “repugnant and callous attitude” of the
experimenters. “It really made a mark on me,” he said.

Poring over polling data, Bellotti could see that there was a big gap between
Democrats and Republicans on the issue. Democrats were much more likely to
support campaigns against animal experiments, which had often focused on
corporate labs, and Republicans tended to back the research. So Bellotti crafted a message calculated to bring the missing Republicans on
board, focusing on government spending. He avoids the label “animal rights,” and has cast the White Coat Waste Project
as a “taxpayer watchdog uniting liberty-lovers and animal-lovers.”

In addition to mobilizing support from the political right, there was another
reason to target government spending: Congress has the power to shut it down.
“The goal isn’t to change hearts and minds, it’s to win the fight,” Bellotti
told BuzzFeed News. “We had to get to the root cause of the problem, which was
the government spending.”

The group didn’t really take off until 2016, when Bellotti hired Justin Goodman,
a former director of laboratory investigations with People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals, to head the White Coat Waste Project’s advocacy efforts.
Goodman started digging into government databases and filing FOIA requests to
identify projects that the group could campaign to defund.

Even before the pandemic, the White Coat Waste Project scored some victories. An early campaign, launched in a report called “Spending to Death,” highlighted
experiments involving dogs in federal labs, including one studying the effects
of blood transfusions in dogs with pneumonia in which some of the animals died.
The group then turned up the heat on the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical
Center in Richmond, Virginia, focusing on experiments into heart disease in
which dogs were run on treadmills after their heart rhythms were disrupted using
implanted pacemaker devices. The White Coast Waste Project’s multiyear effort to shut down Veterans Affairs
dog research eventually led Congress to restrict spending on the work and demand
explicit approval from the secretary for veterans affairs for new dog
experiments by the agency.


[[link removed]]
The cover of the White Coat Waste Project’s 2019 report titled “USDA Kitten
Cannibalism”
White Coat Waste

But it was another campaign that sowed the seeds for the attack on EcoHealth and
its collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. In 2018, the White Coat
Waste Project began to target the US Department of Agriculture’s Animal
Parasitic Diseases Laboratory in Beltsville, Maryland, zeroing in on its
research into toxoplasmosis, which can infect people exposed to cat feces and
can cause brain or eye damage in those with compromised immune systems. The
campaign culminated in a March 2019 White Coat Waste Project report called “USDA
Kitten Cannibalism.” Its cover featured the Chinese flag superimposed over a
photo of USDA’s headquarters in Washington, DC.

That framing drew on an experiment published in 2007 in which cats at the
Maryland facility were fed meat from other cats purchased at a market in China
to gauge its infectivity. Although the full report noted that these experiments
were no longer being run, the association between this gruesome-sounding
research and a nation seen as a major adversary to the US resonated with members
of Congress from both parties and with the media. Within a couple of weeks, the USDA announced that the cat toxoplasmosis
research would be shut down, stating that it had “reached its maturity.”

After that win, Bellotti said that the White Coat Waste Project started to
wonder about what else was being funded with taxpayer dollars outside of the US:
“This is horrible stuff. What else is going on?” So Goodman started to look at
research in foreign labs funded by the NIH, turning to a list of those given an
“animal welfare assurance” needed to receive federal dollars for animal
experiments. He focused particularly on labs in the US’s two main geopolitical
rivals. “One of the things that struck us was that there were at the time 31
labs in Russia and China,” Goodman told BuzzFeed News.


[[link removed]]
Justin Goodman
NewsNation via YouTube / Via youtube.com


[[link removed]]

Still, the White Coat Waste Project remained a small player in the world of
animal activism: Its total revenue in 2019 of around $1.4 million was dwarfed by
the $60 million pulled in by Goodman’s former employer PETA. And initial efforts to interest the Trump administration in Goodman’s findings
on the NIH’s overseas animal research didn’t gain much traction. In January
2020, as reports emerged of a dangerous new virus spreading in China, the White
Coat Waste Project had a meeting with White House officials. Goodman recalls
specifically mentioning the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but the Trump staffers
didn’t bite. “We gave them a bunch of information and never heard back,” Goodman
said. “We got a cursory ‘thank you.’”

At that time, Peter Daszak, president of the EcoHealth Alliance, had never heard of the White
Coat Waste Project and had no inkling of the storm that was brewing. “If you
would have told me that this chain of events was going to happen, I would have
said, ‘No way, this is absolutely impossible,’” he told BuzzFeed News.

Federal spending records show that EcoHealth has received almost $120 million
from research grants and contracts since 2008, from agencies including USAID,
the NIH, and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. EcoHealth’s emergence as a
major player in assessing pandemic threats, working with labs across the world,
was fueled in part by the “near miss” with SARS, another respiratory disease
caused by a coronavirus that emerged in southern China in 2002 and killed nearly
800 people before its spread was brought under control.

Indeed, in late January 2020, officials in Fauci’s institute who were preparing
talking points for their boss, due to appear at a Jan. 28 press conference on
the US response to the new coronavirus, described Daszak’s research into the
risks posed by bat coronaviruses in glowing terms. The EcoHealth group was
“among the biggest players in coronavirus research,” wrote David Morens, senior
adviser to Fauci, in an email obtained through the BuzzFeed News FOIA lawsuit.
“In short, we have on our team … probably the world’s experts in these non-human
coronaviruses.”

“If you would have told me that this chain of events was going to happen, I
would have said, ‘No way, this is absolutely impossible.’”

Fast-forward to April 2020, and the White Coat Waste Project’s findings about
NIH funding for the Wuhan Institute of Virology were starting to find a
receptive audience. On April 11, the group succeeded in getting DailyMail.com,
the website of a British tabloid newspaper with a large online readership in the
US, to run the story: “REVEALED: U.S. Government Gave $3.7 Million Grant to
Wuhan Lab at Center of Coronavirus Leak Scrutiny.” ($3.7 million was actually the total sum paid over six years to EcoHealth,
gleaned by Goodman from the NIH’s grants database; in fact, less than $600,000
went to the Wuhan institute.)


[[link removed]]

The White Coat Waste Project started reaching out to Republicans in Congress —
and the NIH was soon reeling. By April 13, NIH officials were scrambling to
respond to a request for information from the office of Florida Sen. Marco
Rubio, which had forwarded an email from Goodman noting the press coverage of
the White Coat Waste Project’s “troubling find” about the Wuhan institute. In
that email, Goodman noted: “We’re working with Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) and others
on a sign-on letter about this.”


[[link removed]]


[[link removed]]

Two days later, the alarm bells were ringing at the very top of the NIH.


[[link removed]]
[[link removed]]
[[link removed]]

Lawrence Tabak, deputy to Francis Collins, then director of the NIH, wrote to
his boss and Fauci, whose institute had awarded the grant, emphasizing in bold
that the Trump White House was on the warpath: “The WH has strongly embraced
concerns raised by Congressman Gaetz who is publicly criticizing HHS/NIH for
funding the Wuhan laboratory’s bat research.”


[[link removed]]

“I reached Tony, he is now informed,” Collins replied, confirming Fauci was in
the loop.

Then, on April 17, a Newsmax reporter asked Trump about the project, repeating
the false claim that $3.7 million had gone to the Wuhan institute. “We will end
that grant very quickly,” Trump said.

Michael Lauer, head of the NIH Office of Extramural Research, part of Collins’
central command, then took control. On April 19, Lauer wrote to inform EcoHealth
that NIH was looking to suspend the Wuhan institute from receiving federal
funds. Other spending could continue, but EcoHealth should send no more money to
China. In an April 21 email, Daszak told Lauer that since the grant was renewed
for a second five-year term in July 2019, no funds had gone to Wuhan “nor has
any contract been signed.”

But three days later, NIH terminated the entire grant, for “convenience.” In a
one-page letter to EcoHealth on April 24, Lauer wrote: “At this time, NIH does
not believe that the current project outcomes align with the program goals and
agency priorities.”

Daszak was stunned. So too were many other scientists, disturbed that research
that had been exceptionally highly rated in peer review, and which was directly
related to the pandemic, could be canceled at a stroke. On May 21, 77 US Nobel
Prize winners in science wrote to NIH director Collins and Alex Azar, secretary
of health and human services, protesting the decision and describing the
explanation given by Lauer about the NIH’s priorities as “preposterous under the
circumstances.”

EcoHealth’s response came on the day after the Nobelists’ letter, when the
group’s pro bono lawyer wrote to Lauer contending that the NIH didn’t have the
legal authority to terminate a research grant in this way, without cause. The
letter also argued that EcoHealth’s goals were virtually identical to those laid
out in the NIAID Strategic Plan for COVID-19 Research, released the day before
the grant termination.

Later, in a congressional hearing, Fauci was asked why the grant was terminated.
“It was canceled because the NIH was told to cancel it,” he told the House
Energy and Commerce Committee on June 23, 2020. “We got it from the highest
office of the president: ‘Cancel that grant,’” Fauci confirmed to BuzzFeed News.

The backlash against Lauer’s initial letter seemed to prompt a rethink from the
NIH. As first reported by the Wall Street Journal, Lauer came back to EcoHealth
with a second letter on July 8. Abandoning the explanation about the NIH’s
priorities, Lauer wrote that the grant was reinstated, but immediately suspended
because of concerns about biosafety at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. That
tied the suspension directly to the lab leak theory, which posits that the
pandemic may have started with the accidental release of a virus being studied
in the lab, perhaps through a worker who became infected.

“We have concerns that WIV has not satisfied safety requirements under the
award, and that EcoHealth Alliance has not satisfied its obligations to monitor
the activities of its subrecipient to ensure compliance,” Lauer wrote.

To lift that suspension, EcoHealth would have to respond to seven requests for
information and materials. They included: “EcoHealth Alliance must arrange for
WIV to submit to an outside inspection team charged to review the lab facilities
and lab records, with specific attention to addressing the question of whether
WIV staff had SARS-CoV-2 in their possession prior to December 2019.” There was
no way a US nonprofit could get the Chinese authorities to agree to such a
request: Even the WHO team, including Daszak, that later visited the institute
in February 2021 as part of its study of the origins of COVID-19 didn’t get this
unfettered access.

With Lauer’s second letter, the grant entered a state of limbo from which it has
yet to emerge — and seems unlikely to.


[[link removed]]
The Wuhan Institute of Virology on Feb. 3, 2021
Hector Retamal / AFP via Getty Images

Since then, Republicans in Congress have leaned hard into the lab leak theory
and the related idea that the NIH funded EcoHealth and the Wuhan institute to
conduct “gain-of-function” research — when scientists deliberately make viruses
more dangerous in order to study pandemic risks. Internal correspondence
obtained by BuzzFeed News shows NIH officials discussing at length how to
respond to demands for information from congressional Republicans about the
agency’s funding for EcoHealth and the Wuhan institute.

The White Coat Waste Project once again entered the fray. In November 2021, it
released 378 pages of documents obtained through FOIA, including a
back-and-forth in 2016 between Daszak and two NIAID officials. Those officials were concerned that some experiments under EcoHealth’s
collaboration with the Wuhan institute might breach a pause the US government
had imposed on gain-of-function work that could create a potentially pandemic
virus. The experiments involved creating “chimeric” coronaviruses, engineered to
combine genetic sequences from different viruses sampled from the wild.


[{EXTERNAL_URL~[link removed]}] NIAID EMPLOYEES TOLD EHA IN A MAY 28, 2016 LETTER THAT THEIR PROPOSED GRANT
“MAY INCLUDE” GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH.
Some proposed experiments involved chimeras based on the virus that causes MERS,
a respiratory disease that first showed up in Saudi Arabia in 2012 and has since
killed almost 900 people. EcoHealth wanted to replace the MERS virus’s “spike”
protein, used to enter animal or human cells, with those from these new viruses,
to see whether they were also able to latch onto a molecule on cell surfaces
targeted by the MERS virus. The NIAID officials also wanted to know more about
two chimeras that had already been made, in which the genes for spike proteins
from newly discovered bat coronaviruses had been put into another bat
coronavirus called WIV1, named after the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The NIAID officials accepted Daszak’s explanation that these experiments didn’t
meet the US government’s definition of gain-of-function research: He had argued
that there was no reason to suppose the chimeric viruses would be any more
dangerous than the viruses behind MERS and SARS. So the NIAID allowed the
research to continue.

Daszak responded: “This is terrific! We are very happy to hear that our Gain of
Function research funding pause has been lifted.”


[{EXTERNAL_URL~[link removed]}] SMOKING GUN: WCW PROJECT FOIA INVESTIGATION PROVES NIH IGNORED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION
RESEARCH; WUHAN LAB FUNDER CALLS IT “TERRIFIC!”
The White Coat Waste Project later claimed that it had caught Daszak
“red-handed, admitting to gain-of-function research” — omitting the context that
this quote was part of an exchange in which he had argued that the research
didn’t meet the US government’s definition of that term.

“We’ll have to agree to disagree here,” Goodman said, when BuzzFeed News
questioned this claim. “We’re not interested in debating the interpretation of
these emails or the definition of gain-of-function. We’re only interested in
exposing and ending wasteful government spending on dangerous animal
experiments.”

Emails and other documents obtained by BuzzFeed News show that the chimera
experiments had already been deepening EcoHealth’s problems, as Lauer and other
NIH officials looked for evidence that EcoHealth had breached the terms and
conditions of its grant.

“Because [Fauci] became a household name as the pandemic progressed, sure, it
created an opportunity to go after him for animal testing in a way that would
really make waves.”

A heavily redacted series of emails from May 2021 centers on the July 2016
letter from the NIAID that had given EcoHealth permission to resume the chimera
work. Accepting a suggestion made by Daszak himself, it stated that if any of
the chimeric viruses showed unexpectedly rapid growth, he would “immediately
stop all experiments with these viruses” and provide NIAID officials with
information about the unexpected outcomes. Shortly after receiving the letter,
Lauer sent it on to a senior attorney with the Department of Health and Human
Services, assigned to the NIH, changing the subject line on the email thread to
“Gift.”

Daszak’s problem was that the NIH determined that an experiment described in
annual progress reports for the grant indicated that one of these viruses had
made mice engineered to carry the human receptor targeted by SARS-like viruses
sicker than expected and showed signs of rapid growth. “EcoHealth failed to
report this finding right away,” NIH deputy director Tabak later wrote in an
October 2021 letter to James Comer, the ranking Republican member on the House
of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform.

None of this amounts to a smoking gun linking EcoHealth and the Wuhan institute
to the origins of COVID, as the viruses involved were very different to
SARS-CoV-2. And in a letter to Lauer and Tabak after the latter’s communication
with Comer, Daszak contested the conclusion that the experiment did show rapid
viral growth and argued that EcoHealth had complied with its reporting
requirements.

But it gave Lauer evidence that he was looking for. EcoHealth is now under audit
from the Office of Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human
Services, an independent watchdog that monitors fraud, waste, and other
problems, as part of a review of the NIH and “selected grantees” initiated on
June 11, 2021. Documents received by BuzzFeed News through its FOIA lawsuit,
including a timeline of events put together by Lauer dated June 13, 2021,
indicate that the suggestion for an OIG audit of EcoHealth came from the NIH,
just days after Lauer sent his “Gift” email.

The NIH declined to discuss Lauer’s email and timeline, saying in a statement:
“NIH doesn’t comment on internal deliberation of grant awards.”

In December 2021, the White Coat Waste Project claimed a win from its activism
around the EcoHealth grant when President Joe Biden signed the 2022 National
Defense Authorization Act into law. It contained specific wording blocking the
Department of Defense — which over the years has provided almost $40 million to
EcoHealth — from supporting the nonprofit’s research in China.


[[link removed]]
Anthony Fauci
Stefani Reynolds / POOL / AFP via Getty Images

The gain-of-function fight had also intensified the pressure on Fauci, who was by now a hate figure
for many on the political right. In November 2021, he and Kentucky Republican
Sen. Rand Paul clashed angrily in a Senate hearing, as Paul accused Fauci of
changing the definition of gain-of-function and funding dangerous research in
Wuhan. “He is egregiously incorrect,” Fauci responded. In January, they locked
horns in another hearing, featuring an extraordinary exchange in which Fauci
accused Paul of jeopardizing his personal safety for political gain.

“What happens when he gets out and accuses me of things that are completely
untrue is that all of a sudden that kindles the crazies out there, and I have
threats upon my life, harassment of my family and my children,” Fauci said.

By the time of these acrimonious exchanges, the White Coat Waste Project had
embarked on another campaign that made Fauci its main focus. In July 2021, the
White Coat Waste Project launched its “BeagleGate” campaign, highlighting
research on dogs funded by the NIAID, with a blog post headlined: “WCW Exposé:
Fauci Spent $424K on Beagle Experiments, Dogs Bitten to Death by Flies.”

The next month, the White Coat Waste Project accused Fauci of funding “beagle
torture” in Tunisia, referring to a paper published in July 2021 investigating
whether the biting sand flies that spread visceral leishmaniasis, a potentially
fatal disease, preferred to feed on dogs already infected with the parasites
that cause the condition.

The story really took off on Oct. 24, 2021, when 24 members of Congress from
both parties, led by Rep. Nancy Mace, a Republican from South Carolina, wrote to
Fauci protesting “costly, cruel, and unnecessary taxpayer-funded experiments on
dogs.” Fauci’s nemesis, Rand Paul, wasn’t among the signatories, but weighed in
with a tweet touting the White Coat Waste Project’s original blog post:


[[link removed]]

The Washington Post later reported that Fauci’s office received 3,600 calls in
36 hours, causing his assistant to stop answering the phone for two weeks. The
newspaper linked the onslaught to “a campaign by a little-known animal rights
group called the White Coat Waste Project.”

The NIAID tried to address the controversy, stating that it didn’t actually fund
the Tunisian beagle research paper — which in November 2021 was corrected to
remove reference to a grant from the institute, which had been awarded to a
researcher at Ohio State University for related work. “NIAID was listed as a
courtesy because it had supported other leishmaniasis research in the past,” a
spokesperson for the university told BuzzFeed News. But that correction seemed
only to give the White Coat Waste Project more ammunition. “Once again…color us
unconvinced,” it wrote in a later blog post disputing the NIAID’s denial of
funding the work.

The White Coat Waste Project’s critics argue that its demonization of Fauci,
seemingly calculated to channel existing right-wing anger with the government
scientist seen as the public face of mask and COVID vaccine mandates, has taken
animal activism into scary territory.

“They take a tiny sliver of truth, and then around that they build this highly
emotional somewhat fictional narrative to build their case,” Jim Newman,
director of strategic communications with Americans for Medical Progress, which
argues that animal experiments are essential to develop new treatments and
vaccines, told BuzzFeed News. Animal activists have long been accused of
cherry-picking facts and ignoring the goals of research to present animal
experiments in the worst possible light. But portraying individuals as cruel
villains in the current febrile political climate is “a very dangerous direction
to be headed,” Newman said.

“Of course, the pro-animal experimentation lobby hates that we hold government
bosses accountable for funneling tax dollars to cruel and wasteful animal
tests,” Goodman said. “We generally don’t run campaigns targeting individual taxpayer-funded animal
experimenters to respect their privacy and because we question the approach’s
effectiveness, but federal agency bosses are public figures and fair game.”

Threats to Fauci’s life, which began well before the White Coat Waste Project’s
BeagleGate campaign, have been widely documented. Daszak, too, has faced
security scares, including an incident in August 2020 when an envelope
containing a mysterious white powder reportedly turned up at his home. “I get
death threats regularly and we get crank calls at home trying to keep us awake
at night,” Daszak told BuzzFeed News.

The White Coat Waste Project stresses that it opposes violence and issued a
statement in October 2021 saying it had no quarrel with Fauci over his advice on
COVID policies. “You could stand shoulder-to-shoulder with him on COVID response
and go toe-to-toe with him on other issues,” said Goodman, who makes no apology
for the group’s decision to make Fauci the focus of the BeagleGate campaign. “Because he became a household name as the pandemic progressed, sure, it
created an opportunity to go after him for animal testing in a way that would
really make waves.”

As the White Coat Waste Project has seized its opportunities and gained a higher
public profile , the group has itself come under scrutiny. In February, the Campaign for
Accountability filed a complaint with the IRS and the Federal Election
Commission, alleging that the White Coat Waste Project had coordinated with the
White Coat Waste Political Action Committee, founded in 2017, in breach of
regulations prohibiting tax-exempt nonprofits from engaging in political
campaign activities.

In an interview with BuzzFeed News, Bellotti declined to answer questions about
the political action committee, which he said was a separate organization.
Goodman later sent a statement describing the Campaign for Accountability’s
complaint as a “politically-motivated, baseless, and frivolous attack,” noting:
“The WCW Project does not fund activities of the distinct, all-volunteer WCW PAC.”

Despite the partisan dynamics that have driven the White Coat Waste Project’s
campaign against funding for the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Bellotti told BuzzFeed News that his group’s goal remains finding ways to unite
Democrats and Republicans on defunding animal experiments backed by the US
government. “We didn’t know when we launched this that it would get partisan in the way it
did,” he said.

The White Coat Waste Project’s latest campaign, again tapping into concern about
US taxpayer dollars going to the nation’s most powerful adversaries, might just
have broader political appeal. Less than a week after Russia’s invasion of
Ukraine, it published a new blog post: “Breaking: WCW Discovers NIH Pays For
Cruel Kitten Experiments…in Russia!”


[[link removed]]


[[link removed]]Taxpayers shouldn't be forced to pay $20 billion+ for wasteful government animal experiments.

Read our Blog [[link removed]]

Visit Our Website [[link removed]]

Make A Donation
[[link removed]]

[[link removed]] [[link removed]] [[link removed]] [[link removed]]



White Coat Waste Project (WCW) is a 501(c)(3) government watchdog. Contributions
are tax-deductible.

PO Box 26029, Washington, DC 20001

[{external_url~[link removed]
Navigator}]


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You are receiving this email at [email protected]

UNSUBSCRIBE
[[link removed]]

Paid for by
The White Coat Waste Project, INC.
EIN 46-085643