Google's SCOTUS Influence Efforts

View this email in your browser ([link removed])


** CfA's February 24, 2023 Newsletter
------------------------------------------------------------
With your support, Campaign for Accountability is working to expose corruption and hold the powerful accountable.


** This Week's Updates:
------------------------------------------------------------
TTP Report: Google Activates D.C. Influence Machine for Pivotal Supreme Court Case: Last Friday, CfA's Tech Transparency Project (TTP) released a report ([link removed]) documenting Google's efforts to build fake grassroots support for its legal arguments ahead of the Supreme Court's hearing of Gonzalez vs. Google, a lawsuit brought against the tech giant by the family of an American woman killed in an Islamic State attack in Paris. The suit argues that Google-owned YouTube’s amplification of ISIS content through recommendation algorithms is not covered by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act—an over two-decade-old law that shields Google and other tech platforms from liability over user-generated content.

TTP review’s found that 44 parties that signed amicus briefs in support of Google’s position in the case are funded by or linked to the company. Among these were a group of YouTube influencers and a number of organizations tied to the Koch network, which often makes common cause ([link removed]) with Google.

Before publishing the report, TTP shared it exclusively with reporters at Politico, who questioned the groups ([link removed]) behind the YouTuber brief about the apparent coordination.
Ultimately, most who followed the Gonzalez vs. Google hearing agreed that the Justices are unlikely to side against Google in the case, after Justices expressed some degree of worry that their rolling back of Section 230 protections could "break the internet ([link removed]) ."

A second case, Twitter vs. Taamneh, was also thought to have the potential to shake up Section 230, but left the Justices similarly confused ([link removed]) .

The week was summed up rather well in Justice Kagen's admission ([link removed]) during the Gonzalez hearing that “[The Justices] are not, like, the nine greatest experts on the internet."
NLRB Rules Against Broad Non-Disparagement Severance Agreements for Laid Off Workers - This week, the National Labor Relations Board released ([link removed]) its decision in McLaren Macomb, "returning to longstanding precedent holding that employers may not offer employees severance agreements that require employees to broadly waive their rights under the National Labor Relations Act."

Effectively, the NLRB decision prohibits employers from including non-disparagement agreements as a condition of severance packages for laid off employees. With thousands of tech workers at Twitter, Google, and Meta laid off in recent months (and more from Meta expected soon ([link removed]) ), the ruling may clear the way for those workers to speak candidly about their former Big Tech employers.


** What We're Reading:
------------------------------------------------------------

* Facebook’s new $12 fee is straight out of Don Corleone’s playbook ([link removed])
+ "Big Tech’s new business model is making you pay for security and basic customer service when you get hacked. That’s called a protection racket when mobsters do it."
* Tech layoffs: Are they a necessary evil or a control tactic for bosses to regain power? ([link removed])
+ "As employers slash perks and order remote workers back to offices, job cuts are seen by some as part of an insidious message: Do what we say or you’re next."


** Follow Our Work:
------------------------------------------------------------
We thank you for your continued support. Without people like you, our work would not be possible.

Here is how you can stay involved and help us accomplish our mission:
1. Follow CfA on Twitter ([link removed]) .
2. Follow the Tech Transparency Project on Twitter ([link removed]) .
3. Tell your friends and colleagues ([link removed]) about CfA.
4. Send us a tip ([link removed]) .
5. Make a tax-deductible donation ([link removed]) .

Be on the lookout for more updates about our work in the upcoming weeks. Thanks again for signing up to be a part of CfA!

Sincerely,

Michelle Kuppersmith
Executive Director, Campaign for Accountability

============================================================

** Twitter ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])

Copyright © 2023 Campaign for Accountability, All rights reserved.
You signed up for this list at campaignforaccountability.org

Our mailing address is:
Campaign for Accountability
611 Pennsylvania Ave SE
#337
Washington, District Of Columbia 20003
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]