LIV Golf stars have scored a significant victory in their rebellion against the PGA Tour.

LIV Golf players will be eligible to compete in all four major tournaments this season after the PGA of America issued its 2023 eligibility requirements Wednesday, providing a green light.

LIV stars Phil Mickelson, Brooks Koepka, and Martin Kaymer won the PGA Championship before defecting to the Saudi-backed golf tour.

The PGA Championship was the last holdout among the four majors. The latest in the seesaw battle between the dueling golf tours.

Despite previous signals that LIV defectors would be banned from participation in 2023, the PGA of America said they could tee it up at Oak Hill Country Club in Rochester, New York, from May 18-21.

“Sadly, the current division in the professional game is not good for the sport or the future of the game. We hope there might be some resolution soon,” said PGA of America chief executive officer Seth Waugh.

The PGA of America’s decision came only one day after the Royal & Ancient Golf Club of St. Andrews said LIV players were cleared to play in the 151st Open Championship at Royal Liverpool from July 20-23.

Augusta National Golf Club and the USGA previously said LIV golfers would be eligible for the 2023 Masters and U.S. Open.

The biggest soccer league in the world will be overseen by the U.K. government.

The U.K. is following through on a recommendation made by a committee in 2021 to introduce an independent regulator to oversee soccer in the country, the government announced on Thursday.

The regulator’s main purpose will be to “reform the culture of governance in English football clubs and mitigate the risk of clubs being entirely lost to fans and communities.”

English soccer team Bury FC collapsed in 2019 due to financial problems, becoming the first English soccer team to cease operations in 27 years. Macclesfield Town was expelled because of high debts in 2020.

The creation of the regulator also appears to be motivated by the attempted European Super League, which six Premier League clubs joined and then later renounced. The regulator would have the authority to ban teams from joining any breakaway competitions.

Earlier this month, the Premier League charged Manchester City with more than 100 financial violations between 2009 and 2018, which some saw as an attempt to show English authorities that there was no need for an external regulator.

The U.K. addressed this notion in announcing the regulator, saying, “The government is not convinced that an industry regulator would be genuinely independent from the influence of clubs, or could be sufficiently held accountable for its actions and performance.” 

It’s not clear if the regulator will be established in time to influence the sale of Manchester United, which took in its first round of bids last week.

Dapper Labs, the owner of NBA-branded NFTs, and its CEO Roham Gharegozlou are facing a lawsuit that alleges its video-based digital collectibles NBA Top Shot Moments are unregistered securities, not fan products.

A motion to dismiss the 2021 lawsuit was denied by U.S. District Court Judge Victor Marrero on Wednesday.

“Plaintiffs adequately allege that Dapper Labs’ offer of the NFT, Moments, was an offer of an ‘investment contract’ and therefore a ‘security,’ required to be registered by the SEC,” the judge wrote in his decision. 

“Courts have repeatedly found that consumer goods — including art and collectibles like basketball cards — are not securities under federal law,” Dapper Labs SVP Stephanie Martin told The Verge after the ruling. “We are confident the same holds true for moments and other collectibles.”

The plaintiffs also accuse Dapper Labs of “propping up the market for Moments as well as the overall valuation of NBA Top Shot” and the value of its Flow token by preventing money withdrawals by users.

While the tokens aren’t securities, they were ruled “necessary to the totality of the scheme at issue.”

Marrero added: “Not all NFTs offered or sold by any company will constitute a security, and each scheme must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.”

Dapper Labs has three weeks to respond to the lawsuit.