Daily, Americans are spied on in 20 different ways

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: February 22, 2023
------------------------------------------------------------


** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Wikimedia Lawsuit Challenging Mass Internet Surveillance of Americans by NSA
------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON, DC —The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear a challenge to the federal government’s mass surveillance program. ([link removed])

In affirming the dismissal ([link removed]) of the Wikimedia v. NSA lawsuit, the Supreme Court has allowed the government to assert a state secrets privilege related to its domestic and international Upstream surveillance program, which gives the NSA access to massive amounts of communications data.

The lawsuit ([link removed]) was originally filed on behalf of a coalition of educational, legal, human rights and media organizations, including The Rutherford Institute, the ACLU, the Wikimedia Foundation, Amnesty International USA, Human Rights Watch, and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

“On any given day, the average American going about his daily business will be monitored, surveilled, spied on and tracked in more than 20 different ways, by both government and corporate eyes and ears,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “Revelations about the NSA’s spying programs only scrape the surface in revealing the lengths to which government agencies and their corporate allies will go to conduct mass surveillance on Americans’ communications and transactions.”
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: SUPPORT THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ([link removed])

The Wikimedia v. NSA lawsuit ([link removed]) arose in response to efforts by the U.S. government to covertly carry out electronic surveillance and monitoring of U.S. citizens and foreign nationals in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The lawsuit alleges that the NSA engaged in “Upstream surveillance,” which can ensnare Americans’ international communications—including emails, web-browsing content, and search engine queries—by intercepting and copying private communications in bulk while they are in transit, and then searching their contents using keywords associated with NSA targets. These targets, chosen by intelligence analysts, are never approved by any court, and the limitations that exist are weak and riddled with exceptions.

Although the suit was initially dismissed ([link removed]) by a federal district court, which ruled that the groups did not have standing to sue the National Security Agency (NSA), the U.S. Department of Justice and their directors, on appeal, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals partly reversed ([link removed]) the lower court, ruling that the existence of the government’s mass internet surveillance program would violate the First and Fourth Amendments but allowing only Wikimedia to proceed with the lawsuit. However, when Wikimedia sought discovery of evidence related to NSA’s Upstream surveillance, the district court again dismissed the lawsuit based upon the government’s assertion of the state secrets privilege, which allows the
federal government to withhold information in a lawsuit if its disclosure would expose matters which should not be divulged in the interest of national security.

While the NSA acknowledged that it “is monitoring . . . international Internet communications,” the NSA did not want to disclose “information concerning the scope and scale of Upstream surveillance.” The Fourth Circuit affirmed ([link removed]) , but a dissenting opinion warned that courts should not relinquish control over a case to the caprice of the executive branch. On appeal ([link removed]) , Wikimedia argued that the government’s increasingly broad use of the state secrets privilege without sufficient judicial oversight has prevented courts from reviewing the constitutionality of executive branch conduct.

The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) , a nonprofit civil liberties organization, provides legal assistance at no charge to individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated and educates the public on a wide spectrum of issues affecting their freedoms.

The case history and legal documents related to the Wikimedia v. NSA challenge are available at www.rutherford.org ([link removed]) .

Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fscotus-refuses-to-hear-lawsuit-challenging-mass-internet-surveillance-of-americans-by-nsa Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fscotus-refuses-to-hear-lawsuit-challenging-mass-internet-surveillance-of-americans-by-nsa)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2023 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])