While the spy balloon was recovered, the search operations for the three other objects shot down were concluded after no debris was recovered.
Were the additional objects threats? “No, I don’t think so,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said.
Is it just space junk? “I don’t know,” Graham said.
Do we know if these objects are connected to one another? “It’s not clear to me,” said Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del.
Yes, but what are these objects specifically? “They’re not at a stage where they can categorically identify them,” Tillis told reporters.
What does this mean about our awareness of our airspace? “This is a new phenomenon,” Risch said. “We have really good eyes on everything that happens up to about 60,000 feet. We have really good eyes on things that happen near space … [but this area in between] has not been focused on by militaries around the world for a long time."
“We have built large, sophisticated and complex systems that are principally designed to see missiles and planes,” Coons said. “If you take a second to think about it, they’re not designed to see slow-moving balloons.”
“We weren’t looking for those types of things for quite some time until now. Everything has been changed to pick it all up,” Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V., told reporters.
What could shooting down these objects do? It “may have a calming influence on other people that [launch them],” Tillis suggested.
Should the White House be sharing more information? Yes, some lawmakers say.
“I’ve been getting very good briefings from the military” as it relates particularly to operations in Alaska, Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, told a large group of reporters. “But throughout this, the administration needs to be more transparent. … They can say what they know and don’t know. … It’s not sources and methods. The American people are intelligent and mature, let them know."
|