U.S. Science & Engineering Lags Behind (again)
[link removed][UNIQID]
CounterCurrent: Week of 1/19
U.S. S&E Lags Behind (again)
CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed][UNIQID]
Category: Irreproducibility; Reading Time: ~2 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------
** Featured Article - Science and engineering report shows continued loss of U.S. dominance by Ben Guarino ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------
Every two years, the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES), a part of the NSF, produces a report for the President and Congress called Science and Engineering Indicators ([link removed][UNIQID]) . In it, they detail “the state of the U.S. science and engineering (S&E) enterprise over time and within a global context,” including data on education, employment, research & development, and innovation. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the U.S. significantly underperformed compared to other advanced economies, most notably China. This is nothing new; the development of American S&E has consistently lagged behind other nations for decades. Many of the specific metrics remain higher than those of our rivals, such as percentage of GDP spent on R&D, but our proportional growth over time does not measure up. China is on track to surpass the U.S. in S&E achievement within the next five years.
In this week’s featured article ([link removed][UNIQID]) , The Washington Post’s Ben Guarino breaks down the report’s key findings on international S&E, which detail U.S. performance on its own and as it compares to other advanced economies such as China, Japan, South Korea, and the EU. Here are some highlights (lowlights) of the report:
* American 8th graders ranked 7th in the world on the 2015 TIMSS mathematics and science exam. The report notes that “while U.S. students’ mathematics scores have improved since 1990 on national assessments, improvements have slowed in the past decade” (can someone say Common Core?)
* 750,000 American students earned S&E bachelor’s degrees in 2015 compared to China’s 1.7 million. The two countries’ differing populations do not make this difference insignificant, as higher education access is not equivalent in China and the U.S..
* By 2017, the U.S. spent over 35% less of its GDP on research & development than it did in 2000, resulting in just 20% of worldwide expenditures. China contributed 35% of global spending.
* In 2018, the U.S. accounted for a mere 7% of patent families granted to investors, while China contributed 49%.
The reasons for the United States’ lack of S&E achievement are complex and varied, but one remains certain: irreproducibility. According to a 2017 report by Springer Nature ([link removed][UNIQID]) , 86% of over 500 scientists surveyed felt that there was a “crisis of reproducibility” within their field. Three of the top four reasons cited for the crisis are the “selective reporting of results,” “pressure to publish for career advancement,” and “poor statistical analysis.” These factors and many others sully a large swath of research in virtually every field. When studies cannot be reproduced, they cease to be science. Among the effects of this crisis are a distrust of the scientific enterprise by the federal government, the creation of misguided public policy, and the stalling of true innovation.
The NAS will discuss solutions to irreproducibility during our upcoming conference, Fixing Science ([link removed][UNIQID]) . The aim of the conference is to discuss practical solutions to this crisis, and we have assembled many leading scientists to debate the subject. This topic is not without controversy, though.
Last week, a molecular biologist contacted nearly all of the scheduled speakers to urge that they not attend. He then stoked a fire on Twitter, encouraging invited speakers and attendees to discount or disrupt the event. NAS President Peter Wood published an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal ([link removed][UNIQID]) detailing the incident and reiterating NAS’s commitment to holding this event.
The conference is still on, of course, but two speakers have dropped out due to the Twitter-mob’s pressure. This is a frustrating but ultimately unsurprising effect of the ‘cancel culture’ in which we live. The NAS will nonetheless persist in seeking solutions for responsible science, reproducibility, and data transparency.
Until next week.
John David
Communications Associate
National Association of Scholars
P.S. If you are particularly interested in irreproducibility, please consider attending our conference “Fixing Science: Practical Solutions for the Irreproducibility Crisis” on February 7-8 in Oakland, CA. Details on speakers and registration can be found here ([link removed][UNIQID]) .
Read More ([link removed][UNIQID])
For more on the irreproducibility crisis of modern science:
[link removed][UNIQID]
February 7-8, 2020
** Fixing Science: Practical Solutions for the Irreproducibility Crisis ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------
NAS
Join the National Association of Scholars and the Independent Institute as we bring together scientists, academics, government officials, and philanthropists to discuss practical ways to fix how scientists work.
[link removed][UNIQID]
January 12, 2020
** ‘Cancel Culture’ Comes to Science ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Wood
NAS President Peter Wood responds to an angry Twitter-mob and their ringleader, Leonid Teytelman, regarding criticism of our Fixing Science conference.
[link removed][UNIQID]
October 03, 2019
** 'Secret Science' Rule Delayed Until Next Year ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------
David Randall
In September, Scott Pruitt announced that the proposed rule "Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science" would not be finalized until this year. This has led to speculation that the reform will disappear into bureaucratic limbo.
[link removed][UNIQID]
September 19, 2019
** Bad Science Makes for Bad Government ([link removed][UNIQID])
------------------------------------------------------------
David Randall
The government needs to form rules to ensure that the exercise of scientific expertise can itself be independently reproduced and verified.
** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.
============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed][UNIQID])
** Twitter ([link removed][UNIQID])
** YouTube ([link removed][UNIQID])
** Website ([link removed][UNIQID])
** Donate ([link removed][UNIQID])
| ** Join ([link removed][UNIQID])
| ** Renew ([link removed][UNIQID])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed][UNIQID])
Copyright © 2020 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.
Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
