Indivisibles,

Thanks to your generosity the last time we asked you to chip in and fund
our (unbudgeted!) work in Wisconsin, right now, IndivisiTexters are hard
at work doing what almost no other organization in the country is doing:
having conversations with Wisconsin voters about why they should support
progressive candidate Janet Protasiewicz in the Supreme Court primary on
February 21. At the same time those 140,000+ convos are happening,
Indivisibles in Wisconsin are using our Neighbor2Neighbor doorknocking
tool^[ [link removed] ] to talk with their neighbors about Protasiewicz, what’s at stake
in this election, and how to make a plan to vote in the primary. 

So, thank you. Seriously. When I say that work couldn’t have happened
without your support, I mean it. And if we’re successful at preventing a
progressive lockout for the two-person general election in April, it will
be because of your support and the work of our incredible groups on the
ground. Remember: the last Supreme Court race that took place in the
Badger State during a non-presidential election year was decided by only
5,981 votes -- so every conversation with a voter matters a lot.

Today, I want to talk to you transparently about the decisions that we’re
wrestling with here as we get closer to the primary [1](and yes, I’m going
to ask you to chip in to fund the work). I also want to ask you for your
opinion on one of the tactics that we’re considering (seriously, I’m going
to ask you to vote).

What’s at stake

Before I talk to you about our plan, I want to remind you quickly what’s
at stake. Like we told you last time we spoke to you about Wisconsin, The
New York Times called it “the most important election in America in
2023.”^[ [link removed] ] Reader, they’re not wrong.

Wisconsin has a Democratic triplex and a divided trifecta -- that’s a
fancy way of saying that Democrats control the offices of governor,
secretary of state, and attorney general. But, the Republican party
controls both chambers of the state legislature thanks to “the worst
partisan-bias of any court-drawn map in the nation.”^[ [link removed] ]

That means a ton of decisions come down to the Supreme Court, where
conservatives currently hold a 4-3 majority. They’ve picked maps that
allowed Republicans to keep control over the state legislature. They’ve
made it harder to vote by outlawing ballot dropboxes. They struck down a
statewide mask mandate during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. And
they’ve issued decisions limiting the appointment power of Democratic
Governor Tony Evers. 

In other words, they have a lot of power.

And later this year and into 2024, we know that they’re going to have to
make even more big consequential decisions. Namely, whether Wisconsin’s
1849 abortion ban will stay in place^[ [link removed] ], the future of those
gerrymandered maps, and even -- in the event of a contested 2024
presidential, which is a very real possibility -- the winner of the
election. [2]This is where I tell you that if you’ve heard enough and are
ready to chip in right now to fund this work in Wisconsin, you can click
here.

What comes next + our plan to win

I’m really proud of this team and our work in the primary to elect Janet
Protasiewicz -- but part of my job is working with the team to think about
what comes next. And what comes next is [3]what I’m asking for your
support to fund today.

What’s so hard about this work is that we can’t wait until we have all the
answers to start putting the plans and infrastructure in place for the
next phase of this campaign. That means we have to start making decisions
about investments now to be ready to hit the ground running on February
22. What makes this even trickier is, like we told you before, we didn’t
budget for a Wisconsin election program when we were putting together
budgets last summer; whether or not we can do this, and just how big we’re
able to go, depends on people like you believing in the work that
Indivisible does to win.

So, let’s talk about our plan.

I want to hit the ground running on February 22 with a four-pronged
approach to winning the general in April:

📱 Expand our texting program. I’d like to greenlight an additional $6,000
to text 170,000 voters about what’s at stake this election and make sure
they turn out for our preferred candidate. Our universe here is unique
compared to other organizations we know will be running direct voter
contact programs -- we’re targeting likely voters we think we can turn out
if we have a conversation with those who live with unlikely voters. And
we’re asking them explicitly to make sure their whole household votes to
protect abortion rights and democracy in April. 

📬 Add postcards to our plan and experiment to grow capacity in Wisconsin.
Tons of Indivisible groups across the country have been in touch with
their organizer asking us for postcards, postage, addresses of voters, and
scripts to use when writing to Wisconsinites. While not as effective as,
say, knocking doors, postcards do have a proven impact on turnout^[ [link removed] ], and
for groups outside of Wisconsin who want to get involved, we think it’s a
great way to support the work of groups on the ground. The thing here that
I’m really excited about is also experimenting a little bit -- I’d love to
include a direct ask in those postcard scripts for local voters who we
know are with us to join their local Indivisible group. Growing groups is
a priority for us -- and understanding what kind of leads we can generate
from something like postcarding would be great information as we think
about how to scale plans to build capacity nationwide. My hope is that we
can spend about $10,000 to get 11,000 postcards into the hands of groups
the week after the primary.

💸 Provide direct financial support to Indivisible groups in Wisconsin
doing the work to win. Y’all, groups on the ground in Wisconsin are
hitting the ground hard to win this election that will have national
consequences long after the polls close. We’d love to be able to say yes
to some of their requests for direct financial support on other things
they’d like to do to keep their volunteers energized and bring new
activists into their groups (and look, we think they definitely deserve
some pizza 🍕).

🗳️ Let you decide! Okay, here’s where I want you to weigh in. Groups in
Wisconsin have asked for our help on tactics like radio and newspaper ads
with a dual purpose of turning out more voters to win in April and
recruiting new Indivisibles to the fight. And I want to try it. For just
under $10,000, we can work hand-in-hand with local groups in Wisconsin to
design and run a full-page newspaper ad or a local radio ad to turnout
voters with messages about what’s at stake in this election and include a
hard ask to join a local group. Just like the postcard experiment, I think
there’s a lot we could learn here about recruitment as we aim to build
group capacity not just in Wisconsin but across the country ahead of
2024. 

So, it’s up to you (seriously). Do you think we should run a full-page
newspaper ad or a radio ad to turn out voters for the Wisconsin Supreme
Court election and recruit new Indivisibles to local groups: 

[4]📻 VOTE 📰

I am really excited about this work y’all, and I think it can make a real
difference in this race (remember, fewer than 6,000 votes last time!).
[5]I hope you agree, and if you have the capacity to do so, chip in now to
help us stand up these programs so we can hit go the moment that we win in
the primary.

If you've saved your information with ActBlue Express Lane, your donation
to Indivisible Action will go through immediately:

[ [link removed] ]Donate $7 >>

[ [link removed] ]Donate $25 >>

[ [link removed] ]Donate $50 >>

[ [link removed] ]Donate $75 >>

[ [link removed] ]Donate another amount >>

Whether or not you’re able to give today, we’ll have more ways you can get
involved (and we can’t wait to show you that newspaper or radio ad). 

Let’s go.

In solidarity, 

Sarah Dohl 
Chief Campaigns Officer, Co-Founder 
Indivisible

 

^[1] [ [link removed] ]Explainer on our Neighbor2Neighbor program on YouTube.

^[2] [ [link removed] ]A Colossol Off-Year Election in Wisconsin, by Reid J. Epstein.
New York Times, 1/6/23.

^[3] [ [link removed] ]Report: Wisconsin Legislature Maps Have the Worst Partisan-Bias
of Any Court-Drawn Map in the Nation, by Joy Powers. WUWM 89.7, 5/9/22. 

^[4] [ [link removed] ]AG Josh Kaul asks judge not to dismiss case challenging abortion
ban in Wisconsin, by Alexander Schur and Mitchell Schmidt. Wisconsin State
Journal, 1/18/23.

^[5] [ [link removed] ]A field experiment on handwritten postcards in the 2022 PA
Primary, Progressive Turnout Project. 



[ [link removed] ]Indivisible Facebook

[ [link removed] ]Indivisible Twitter

[ [link removed] ]Indivisible Instagram



You can unsubscribe from this mailing list at any time:
[link removed]