This is the Daily Media Update published by the Institute for Free Speech. For press inquiries, please contact [email protected].  
In the News

By Megan Menchaca
.....A conservative University of Texas professor has sued three officials in the McCombs School of Business, accusing them of violating his First Amendment rights by retaliating against him for his criticism of the university.
Richard Lowery, an associate professor of finance, alleges that his public criticism of the university, including against the school’s diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, prompted officials to threaten his job status and academic freedom, according to the lawsuit filed last week in federal district court.
The Courts
 
By Andrew Wimer
.....The First Amendment broadly protects Americans’ right to criticize the government and its officials without being subjected to ruinous litigation. Still, local governments often test the boundaries, looking for ways to use taxpayer money to go after their critics.
A recent egregious example is happening in suburban Cleveland. The city of Beachwood and its chief of police, Katherine McLaughlin, are using public funds to file a defamation suit against an anonymous critic. According to the lawsuit, the critic posted five anonymous Facebook comments and sent one anonymous email to the mayor, city council and a reporter.
Congress
 
By Gabe Kaminsky
.....Republican senators and representatives are raising concerns over the State Department bankrolling a "disinformation" tracking group that is secretly blacklisting and trying to defund conservative media outlets.
The State Department has granted hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Global Disinformation Index, a British organization with two affiliated U.S. nonprofit groups that is feeding blacklists of conservative media to advertising companies, according to multiple Washington Examiner reports. Now, GOP members of Congress are slamming the government over this funding, which First Amendment lawyers have said appears troubling.
DOJ
 
By Ed Pilkington
.....The FBI’s use of an informant to infiltrate Black Lives Matter in Denver during the wave of protests over the 2020 police killing of George Floyd has prompted concern in Congress that the federal agency is once again abusing its powers to harass and intimidate minority groups.
Ron Wyden, the Democratic senator from Oregon, is calling for the FBI to explain how it came to recruit a violent felon as an informant who then went on to gain prominence among Denver racial justice activists. The informant is alleged to have encouraged protesters to engage in increasingly violent demonstrations while trying to entrap them in criminal misdeeds.
“If the allegations are true, the FBI’s use of an informant to spy on first amendment-protected activity and stoke violence at peaceful protests is an outrageous abuse of law-enforcement resources and authority,” Wyden told the Guardian.
Free Expression

By David Lat
.....Last week, I published a Boston Globe op-ed about the benefits to Biglaw of viewpoint diversity—i.e., having lawyers and staff who come from across the ideological spectrum. The essay was behind the Globe’s paywall, so some of you weren’t able to read it.
Fortunately, under the terms of my freelancer’s agreement with the Globe, I’m now able to publish it digitally. It appears below, for those of you who weren’t able to read it previously.
Online Speech Platforms

By Steven Lee Myers and Nico Grant
.....Last month, [YouTube] quietly reduced its small team of policy experts in charge of handling misinformation, according to three people with knowledge of the decision. The cuts, part of the reduction of 12,000 employees by Google’s parent company, Alphabet, left only one person in charge of misinformation policy worldwide, one of the people said.
The cuts reflect a trend across the industry that threatens to undo many of the safeguards that social media platforms put in place in recent years to ban or tamp down on disinformation — like false claims about the Covid-19 pandemic, the Russian war in Ukraine or the integrity of elections around the world. Twitter, under its new owner, Elon Musk, has slashed its staff, while Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, has shifted its focus and resources to the immersive world of the metaverse.
Candidates and Campaigns

By Inci Sayki
.....Congressional candidates poured about $300 million of their own money into self-funding campaigns in the 2022 midterm election cycle but few ultimately won their races, a new OpenSecrets analysis found…
Self-financing made up 8% of the record $3.6 trillion of total campaign funds raised by federal candidates during the 2022 election cycle.
Self-funding candidates were some of the biggest losers this election cycle, with only two out of the top 10 self-funding candidates pulling through a win. Both winners were House candidates, while the eight who lost ran for Senate seats.
By Reid J. Epstein
.....Last year, Democrats spent millions of dollars elevating far-right candidates in Republican primary contests for governor and Congress — betting, it turned out correctly, that more extreme opponents would lose general elections.
Now Wisconsin Democrats are trying to do it again, this time with mail and TV ads before a Republican primary in a special election for a State Senate seat that carries ramifications far beyond the district in suburban Milwaukee.
The Democrats are helping a far-right election denier who has become a pariah within her party in her race against a less extreme, but still election-denying, conservative. They hope that with a more vulnerable opponent, Democrats can win a seat held for decades by Republicans and deny the G.O.P. a veto-proof majority in the gerrymandered chamber.
By Kate Ackley
.....Winning control of the most sought-after committees in the House can come with a hefty price tag — in party dues. 
The eight lawmakers atop the four panels dubbed “A” committees transferred more than $5.2 million from their own political accounts to their respective parties’ campaign arms in the 2022 cycle, according to a new report shared first with CQ Roll Call by Issue One, which advocates for overhauling campaign finance laws. 
The States
 
By Erin McCullough
.....Tennessee lawmakers are hoping to make a few changes to the state’s campaign finance laws, including allowing religious organizations to be exempt from the Campaign Disclosure Act of 1980 in certain circumstances, changing the designations of certain political committees, and eliminating party fees for candidates. Here are the bills filed that deal with financial issues for elections and candidates.
By Joel Porter
.....North Dakota lawmakers say they want more information on where money is coming from funding candidates and ballot measures.
House Bill 1529 would require a candidate or a political backing group to declare every donation over $200 they received by the month before Election Day.
Before February 1, a statewide party must also file a campaign disclosure statement showing contributions from the past year.
State elections workers say right now, there are more than 40 bills being proposed at the capitol related to elections, and they argue they don’t have the staffing or the time to police every campaign dollar.
By Steve Mistler
.....The arraignment date has been set for a state lawmaker from Waldoboro who is accused of forging signatures to obtain public funds through Maine's campaign financing program.
Read an article you think we would be interested in? Send it to Tiffany Donnelly at [email protected]. For email filters, the subject of this email will always begin with "Institute for Free Speech Media Update."  
The Institute for Free Speech is a nonpartisan, nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization that promotes and defends the First Amendment rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government. Please support the Institute's mission by clicking here. For further information, visit www.ifs.org 
Follow the Institute for Free Speech