From PBS NewsHour <[email protected]>
Subject The GOP’s 1st steps in investigating Biden
Date February 15, 2023 12:33 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
It’s Tuesday, the traditional day for elections and for our pause-and-consider newsletter on politics and policy.

[link removed]

[link removed]
Photo by Evelyn Hockstein/ Reuters

THE FIRST TWO WEEKS OF HOUSE INVESTIGATIONS
By Lisa Desjardins
@LisaDNews ([link removed])

The newly Republican-led House of Representatives is taking its first two-week break from Washington following its first weeks of full-fledged action in the chamber and on committees. You may recall that House Republicans pledged last year to launch investigations ([link removed]) into the Biden administration immediately upon taking power.

Just a few House committees are leading the Republicans’ efforts so far, out of the 20-plus standing committees ([link removed]) with oversight functions. We thought it a good time to take quick stock of who’s leading these probes.

Which committees?

Four committees have held investigatory hearings about specific policies or actions connected to President Joe Biden or his administration.
* The House Judiciary Committee launched a subcommittee on the “Weaponization of the Federal Government,” ([link removed]) which plans to look into any government overreach into individual lives by the Department of Justice, FBI or any agency. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, chairs the Judiciary Committee and is also overseeing this subcommittee. He is known for his sharp and often combative questioning.
* The House Oversight Committee ([link removed]) has the ability to look into a wide range of issues across the Cabinet agencies. Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., is the chair and has a contrasting approach from Jordan. He also can be confrontational but is less likely to be combative.
* The House Ways & Means Committee ([link removed]) can look into any activities by the Internal Revenue Service as well as most financial agencies. Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., is the new chairman of the committee after leading Republican tax voice Kevin Brady retired.
* The House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee ([link removed]) is not expected to be a major investigatory force but does have a role in scrutinizing infrastructure money, as well as some environmental policy. Rep. Sam Graves, R-Mo., chairs this committee.

What have the committees done so far?

Let’s start with the ones outside the headlines.
* The House Transportation Committee makes this list due to a hearing ([link removed]) last week on the “Waters of the United States,” or WOTUS, environmental policy that is part of the Clean Waters Act, put in place during the Obama administration and now championed by the Biden administration. Conservatives have long said WOTUS extends government power too far, to tiny bits of water, and, according to North Carolina Rep. David Rouzer, has placed “unnecessary burdens” on farmers and businesses. Democrats counter that it’s critical for keeping America’s water clean.
* The House Ways and Means Committee held a hearing on unemployment fraud ([link removed]) , specifically any that occurred with benefits temporarily extended at the start of the pandemic. This timing includes both the Biden and Trump administrations. Witnesses focused on the lack of guardrails and checks on beneficiaries.

Then there are the two committees leading the more high-profile investigations.
* House Oversight Committee
+ Its first hearing was Feb. 1, on pandemic spending fraud ([link removed]) . Again, this topic is not limited to the Biden administration, but does largely include Biden’s term.
+ Its second hearing was Feb. 7, on the crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border ([link removed]) . The hearing focused on the current state of the border and Biden’s policies. The witnesses were two U.S. Customs and Border Patrol chiefs who work in border sectors.
+ Its third hearing was Feb. 8. This was still not directly an investigation of Biden, but did tee up one that is coming. In this hearing, House Oversight grilled Twitter executives ([link removed]) about decisions to initially block stories about the discovery of a laptop owned by Biden’s son Hunter.
* House Judiciary Committee
+ The committee opened with a Feb. 1 hearing also focused on the border crisis ([link removed]) . Witnesses here included local officials near the border.
+ Not a hearing, but on Feb. 3, the House Judiciary took a significant step, issuing subpoenas ([link removed]) to Attorney General Merrick Garland, FBI Director Christopher Wray and Education Secretary Miguel Cardona for documents related to school board meetings and any law enforcement action against parents.
+ On Feb. 9, the Weaponization Subcommittee held its first hearing ([link removed]) , focused largely on testimony of former FBI agents about the practices at the Justice Department.

Are they coordinating with each other?

Overall, we learned that the two key committees — Judiciary and Oversight — are communicating, but will proceed in different manners.

Jordan’s Judiciary Committee wasted no time in issuing subpoenas during one of their first weeks of formal meetings. In a sign of some coordination, Jordan did appear at an oversight hearing. But in general the two chairmen have different approaches, with Comer appearing to anticipate a longer and slower series of investigations, with more focus on top officials involved in policymaking.

What’s come out of the hearings specifically?

These are just the first weeks. But so far, the hearings have not produced any eye-popping news about the Biden administration. At times they have raised more questions about their subjects. At other times, they have countered what seemed to have been Republicans’ purpose.
* The Weaponization Subcommittee’s hearing largely was a chance for lawmakers, including former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, to echo their concerns ([link removed]) about FBI and DOJ behavior, which Republicans claim has included politically motivated targeting of conservatives. Standout testimony came from former FBI special agent Nicole Parker ([link removed]) , who resigned from the agency because she felt it was becoming too political. She testified, for example, that she had seen agents kneel with Black Lives Matter protesters ([link removed]) – something she saw as crossing a line into politics that would be inappropriate for an impartial FBI.
* The two border panels — one from Judiciary and one from Oversight — highlighted a glaring fact: The surge of migrants at the U.S. border has soared in recent months, and officials of all stripes have struggled to keep up. At the Judiciary panel, witnesses offered different opinions on the role of the Biden administration’s policy, with a border-region sheriff testifying ([link removed]) that no border agents he knows feel the current system is working. But the top official in El Paso County, Texas, disagreed ([link removed]) , saying that there is not an open border there and that, along with security, U.S. policy must consider the needs of asylum seekers and migrants.
* Finally, the hearing on how Twitter handled the Hunter Biden ([link removed]) story took some surprising turns, with three Twitter executives acknowledging the initial mistakes in how Twitter blocked the story but consistently defending the company’s policies overall.

Any other investigations of note?

Yes!

Perhaps the most eye-opening hearing of the past two weeks was not related to the Biden administration but rather the architect of the Capitol.

The importance of the role is hard to overstate. That office is responsible for a litany of policies inside the U.S. Capitol that affect the movements and operations of members of Congress, the press and visitors. It is a bit like a mini-fiefdom.

In a Feb. 9 hearing ([link removed]) , members of the usually outside-the-zeitgeist House Administration Committee blasted then-architect J. Brett Blanton, particularly regarding an inspector general report that Blanton abused his office ([link removed]) , including by misuse of a vehicle and of government funds.

The architect is appointed by the president. And within a week, following recommendations by a host of lawmakers, including House Speaker Kevin McCarthy ([link removed]) , Biden fired Blanton ([link removed]) . One hearing, and one quick decision.
More on politics from our coverage:
* Watch: President Biden discusses the economy, U.S.-China relations and the country’s political division in an exclusive interview with the PBS NewsHour’s Judy Woodruff ([link removed]) .
* Read: We offer a few takeaways ([link removed]) from the Biden-Woodruff conversation.
* One Big Question: Why has the U.S. been shooting down flying objects ([link removed]) ? National Security Council spokesman John Kirby explains.
A Closer Look: The release of toxic chemicals after a train derailment in Ohio ([link removed]) is prompting broader safety concerns.

#POLITICSTRIVIA

By Dan Cooney, @IAmDanCooney ([link removed])
Social Media Producer/Coordinator

It's a special Valentine's Day edition of trivia this week. Nineteen couples have chosen to declare their love for each other during wedding ceremonies hosted by the president and first lady.

Our question: Only one U.S. president has actually married on White House grounds. Can you name the president and his bride?

Send your answers to [email protected] or tweet using #PoliticsTrivia. The first correct answers will earn a shout-out next week.

Last week, we asked: One hundred years ago, President Calvin Coolidge was the first president to have his Annual Message (now known as the State of the Union address) broadcast to major U.S. cities via radio. Who was the first president whose Annual Message was broadcast to any audience on the radio, and what year did that take place?

The answer: President Warren Harding used a new public address system ([link removed]) inside the House chamber to broadcast ([link removed]) his 1922 Annual Message across the Capitol building and to a nearby naval broadcasting station, where it was transmitted to a limited public audience.

Send your answers to [email protected] or tweet using #PoliticsTrivia. The first correct answers will earn a shout-out next week.

Congratulations to our winner: Barry Weinstein!

Thank you all for reading and watching. We’ll drop into your inbox next week.
[link removed]
Want more news and analysis in your inbox?
Explore all of the PBS NewsHour's newsletters ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
[link removed]

============================================================
Copyright © 2023 WETA, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
3620 South 27th Street
Arlington, VA 22206

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
** update subscription preferences ([link removed])
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: PBS NewsHour
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • MailChimp