From Gatestone Institute <[email protected]>
Subject 'The Global Getaway': More Empty Promises from the EU?
Date February 14, 2023 10:28 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[link removed]

In this mailing:
* Judith Bergman: 'The Global Getaway': More Empty Promises from the EU?
* Lawrence A. Franklin: China's Balloon Reveals the Weaknesses in US National Security Decision-Making


** 'The Global Getaway': More Empty Promises from the EU? ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

by Judith Bergman • February 14, 2023 at 5:00 am
[link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed]
email/offer?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gatestoneinstitute.org%2F19400%2Feu-global-getaway-china&pubid=ra-52f7af5809191749&ct=1&title=%27The+Global+Getaway%27%3A+More+Empty+Promises+from+the+EU%3F [link removed]
* The Global Gateway project was launched in December 2021. Meanwhile, China's BRI was launched in 2012 and has spread all over the globe, especially to Africa, Latin America and Asia, where it has gained China vast influence. The Communist Party newspaper China Daily recently claimed that in 2022 alone, China had signed new contracts with BRI countries worth nearly $100 billion.
* As of March 2022, the number of countries around the world that have joined the BRI by signing a Memorandum of Understanding with China was 147, according to the Green Finance and Development Center at Fudan University in Shanghai. Forty-three of those countries were in sub-Saharan Africa and another 18 countries were in North Africa and the Middle East.
* The US Center for Global Development has criticized the Global Gateway program as a "mere packaging exercise of things that have already been programmed," and saying that the €300 billion promised in new investments is not new at all.
* The Global Gateway project is "a strategy to put together what was already going to happen and present it as something new, and if our partners are tricked by this then more fool them". — Barry Andrews, an Irish member of the European Parliament, December 15, 2022.
* "While China has roads, bridges and dams to show for its 20-year-engagement with Africa... the EU brings red tape and a lecture." — African view of Global Gateway, Euractiv, December 20, 2021.
* Since 1991, China's foreign ministers have made it a tradition always to travel to Africa on their first trip abroad in the New Year. This year, China's new Foreign Minister Qin Gang visited Ethiopia, Gabon, Angola, Benin and Egypt in a week-long tour.
* "Who listens and understands the context in which African countries are operating is going to be the better development partner... The EU is the one that doesn't listen.... Was there consultation with African partners leading up to the global gateway? Zero." — Ovigwe Eguegu, Nigerian policy adviser at consultancy Development Reimagined, Euractiv, December 20, 2021.
* "Beijing has long viewed African countries as occupying a central position in its efforts to increase China's global influence and revise the international order..." — US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 2020 Report to Congress.

It has been just over a year since the EU launched its Global Gateway infrastructure project to compete with China's Belt and Road Initiative. According to African criticism of the project, "While China has roads, bridges and dams to show for its 20-year-engagement with Africa... the EU brings red tape and a lecture." Pictured: Chinese President Xi Jinping welcome's Niger's President Mahamadou Issoufou in Beijing on May 28, 2019. (Photo by Nicolas Asfouri/AFP via Getty Images)

It has been just over a year since the European Union launched its Global Gateway infrastructure project to compete with China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

The Global Gateway project was launched in December 2021. Meanwhile, China's BRI was launched in 2012 and has spread all over the globe, especially to Africa, Latin America and Asia, where it has gained China vast influence. The Communist Party newspaper China Daily recently claimed that in 2022 alone, China had signed new contracts with BRI countries worth nearly $100 billion.

Promising to dedicate up to €300 billion between 2021 and 2027 to invest in the digital, energy and transport sectors in developing countries and to strengthen health, education and research systems across the world, the EU and its member states have vowed to become a sustainable alternative to China's BRI. It is questionable, however, whether such an ambition is even feasible at this late stage.

Continue Reading Article ([link removed])


** China's Balloon Reveals the Weaknesses in US National Security Decision-Making ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

by Lawrence A. Franklin • February 14, 2023 at 4:00 am
[link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed]
National+Security+Decision-Making [link removed] [link removed]
* If China perceives that the America's leaders lack resolve or that its national security decision-makers are divided, these failures can only tempt Chinese aggression against Siberia or Taiwan. After watching America's debacles in Afghanistan and a week of hosting the balloon, China must be asking: If not now, when?
* These reconnaissance flights seem but one dimension of a vast, multidimensional intelligence-collection effort by China.
* The most important lesson China might have learned, unfortunately, is that Washington's bungled balloon performance could well be replicated if Communist China's President Xi Jinping invaded Taiwan or other targets.

(Image source: iStock)

The second-most damaging impact to US security regarding spy balloon that the Chinese Communist Party floated over the entire US continent may have been the assessment that China's decision-makers gleaned from the perceived clumsy and indecisive manner in which America's political and military leaders responded to the incident.

China, flaunting a lack of respect for the US, publicly ridiculed the balloon's shoot-down and did not answer the phone when US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin called. If China perceives that the America's leaders lack resolve or that its national security decision-makers are divided, these failures can only tempt Chinese aggression against Siberia or Taiwan. After watching America's debacles in Afghanistan and a week of hosting the balloon, China must be asking: If not now, when?

Continue Reading Article ([link removed])

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** RSS ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
Copyright © Gatestone Institute, All rights reserved.

You are subscribed to this list as [email protected]

You can change how you receive these emails:
** Update your subscription preferences ([link removed])
or ** Unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** Gatestone Institute ([link removed])

14 East 60 St., Suite 705, New York, NY 10022
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis