From Jerrick Adams <[email protected]>
Subject Policy under review: donor disclosure requirements for electioneering communications
Date January 20, 2020 7:34 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
A closer look at donor disclosure requirements for groups that sponsor electioneering communications
------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to _The Disclosure Digest_, a weekly look at state and federal disclosure policies for nonprofit organizations and their donors.



** POLICY UNDER REVIEW: DONOR DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR ELECTIONEERING COMMUNICATIONS
------------------------------------------------------------

As the year gets underway, and lawmakers nationwide take up bills on donor disclosure, let's take a closer look at a particular policy area: donor disclosure requirements for groups that sponsor electioneering communications.

Broadly speaking, AN ELECTIONEERING COMMUNICATION IS ANY BROADCAST, CABLE, OR SATELLITE TRANSMISSION THAT REFERS TO A CLEARLY IDENTIFIED CANDIDATE WITHIN A SPECIFIED TIME PERIOD PRECEDING A PRIMARY OR GENERAL ELECTION. Although electioneering communications refer to a specific candidate, they do not explicitly advocate ([link removed]) for that candidate's election or defeat. This makes an electioneering communication a form of issue advocacy ([link removed]) .

Individuals, corporations, labor unions, and nonprofit groups can produce electioneering communications. Generally, the policies regulating the use of electioneering communications vary from state to state (although federal laws apply to electioneering communications used in federal elections).

The first map below indicates which states require entities making electioneering communications to disclose the names of their donors to the public. States shaded in dark green require general disclosure of all donors to a sponsor group. States shaded in light green require disclosure only of those donors whose contributions were earmarked for electioneering purposes. TWENTY-TWO STATES REQUIRE GROUPS ISSUING ELECTIONEERING COMMUNICATIONS TO MAKE SOME FORM OF DISCLOSURE.

The second map below indicates which states exempt 501(c)(3) ([link removed]) groups from these disclosure requirements. States shaded in dark green provide a 501(c)(3) exemption. States shaded in gray do not. SIX STATES PROVIDE EXPLICIT DISCLOSURE EXEMPTIONS FOR AT LEAST SOME TYPES OF 501(C)(3) GROUPS.


------------------------------------------------------------

[link removed]
------------------------------------------------------------


** WHAT WE'RE READING
------------------------------------------------------------

* Washington Examiner, "How policymakers are threatening philanthropy in 2020," Jan. 16. 2020 ([link removed])
* Bloomberg Tax, "New York Seeks Monthly Data Dump in Fight Over Donor Rules," Jan. 14, 2020 ([link removed])
* Vox, "Why Jack Dorsey (and you) should pay attention to this proposed charity law in California," Jan. 14, 2020 ([link removed])


------------------------------------------------------------


** THE BIG PICTURE
------------------------------------------------------------


** _NUMBER OF RELEVANT BILLS BY STATE_
------------------------------------------------------------

We're currently tracking 35 pieces of legislation dealing with donor disclosure. On the map below, a darker shade of green indicates a greater number of relevant bills. Click here ([link removed]) for a complete list of all the bills we're tracking.


** _NUMBER OF RELEVANT BILLS BY CURRENT LEGISLATIVE STATUS_
------------------------------------------------------------


** _NUMBER OF RELEVANT BILLS BY PARTISAN STATUS OF SPONSOR(S)_
------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------


** RECENT LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
------------------------------------------------------------

Below is a complete list of legislative actions taken on relevant bills since our last issue. Bills are listed in alphabetical order, first by state then by bill number.

* IOWA HF697 ([link removed]) : This bill would prohibit public agencies from requiring 501(c) entities to furnish them with personal information about donors.

* Hearing scheduled for Jan. 22.

* OKLAHOMA SB1491 ([link removed]) : This bill would prohibit public agencies from requiring 501(c) entities to furnish them with personal information about donors.

* Pre-filed to be introduced Feb. 3.

* VIRGINIA HB849 ([link removed]) : This bill would subject political campaign communications made via online platforms to the same disclosure requirements currently applied to print media, television, and radio advertisements.

* Hearing scheduled for Jan. 17.

------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for reading! Let us know what you think! Reply to this email with any feedback or recommendations.

============================================================

BALLOTPEDIA DEPENDS ON THE SUPPORT OF OUR READERS.

The Lucy Burns Institute, publisher of Ballotpedia, is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. All donations are tax deductible to the extent of the law. Donations to the Lucy Burns Institute or Ballotpedia do not support any candidates or campaigns.


** Click here to support our work ([link removed])


-------------------------
_Copyright © 2020, All rights reserved._

OUR MAILING ADDRESS IS:

Ballotpedia
8383 Greenway Blvd
Suite 600
Middleton, WI 53562
** unsubscribe from all emails ( [link removed] )
** update subscription preferences ( [link removed] )
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Ballotpedia
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • Litmus