U.S./UK ‘Confidentiality Agreement’ on Vaccine Adverse Events



[INSIDE JW]

Secret Service Official on Hunter: ‘Maybe We Were Asked for A
Favor?’

[[link removed]]
As you know, we are investigating whether and how the Secret
Service intervened for Hunter Biden in an incident involving a gun he
allegedly owned. Here’s the latest.

We received records from the Secret Service related to the
investigation of Hunter Biden’s gun, reportedly disposed of in a
dumpster
[[link removed]]
in Delaware in October 2018.

These new records suggest that one can’t take at face value the
Secret Service’s denial that it wasn’t involved in the Hunter
Biden gun cover-up.

The records show agency officials discussing media reports of its
alleged involvement, with one finding it “odd” that the Secret
Service was involved in the investigation when Joe and Hunter Biden
were not receiving Secret Service protection at the time. Another
official responds: “Maybe we were asked for a favor?”

The records show the agency alerted the Biden White House and crafted
a public statement insisting it had “no involvement in this alleged
incident” and refusing to provide any additional clarification to
media inquiries.

In September 2022, we filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
lawsuit
[[link removed]]
for records or communications about the reported purchase, possession,
and disposal of a firearm owned by Hunter Biden found in a Delaware
dumpster in October 2018 (_Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of
Homeland Security_
[[link removed]]
(No. 1:22-cv-02841)).

We reported
[[link removed]]
in December 2022 that the Secret Service repeatedly changed its
position
[[link removed]]
about whether it is in possession of records related to the
investigation of Hunter Biden’s gun.

The newly obtained records show that on October 29, 2020, a person
whose name is redacted emails
[[link removed]]
a Secret Service official in the “PID” (Protective Intelligence
and Assessment Division) with a link to a _Blaze_ article
[[link removed]]
published earlier that day, reporting that Hallie Biden had taken a
handgun owned by Hunter Biden in October 2018 and thrown it into a
supermarket trash bin. The official then forwards the article to
another official in the PID.

An official whose name is redacted later comments in this chain: “Oh
dear…”

After being forwarded the same _Blaze_ article, an unidentified
Protective Intelligence Research Specialist responds to his
colleagues: “It’s kind of odd that we were involved in the missing
gun investigation when neither Hunter or Joe were even receiving USSS
[Secret Service] protection at the time? Hmmm.” Another official
replies: “Maybe we were asked for a favor?”

Senior Secret Service officials, whose names were disclosed in the
records, were also notified
[[link removed]]
of _The Blaze_ article on November 2, 2020. They include James Henry,
then-Special Agent in Charge of the Philadelphia Field Office; Michael
D’Ambrosio, Assistant Director of the U.S. Secret Service in charge
of oversight of all Secret Service domestic and foreign Secret Service
offices; Steven Stanford, then-Deputy Assistant Director; Leonza
Newsome III, then-Deputy Director; and Douglas Henderson, Deputy
Assistant Director, Office of Investigations.

After _The_ _Blaze _article was forwarded by James Henry to a
colleague in the Wilmington, DE, office, whose name is redacted, the
colleague responds to Henry: “Digging in now. There is more
information but I don’t have it yet.”

In response to a February 24, 2021, email
[[link removed]]
inquiry from _Politico _reporter Ben Schreckinger regarding the Secret
Service’s involvement in the investigation of the Hunter Biden gun
incident, the Communications Department asks for “more information
or documentation.” Schreckinger responds: “Sure thing. Agents
visited StarQuest Shooters & Survival Supply and asked to take
possession of the paperwork Hunter had filled out to purchase a gun
there. The FBI also had some involvement in the investigation.”

The Communications Office then drafts and distributes internally a
proposed response labeled “Draft/Predecisional/Draft.”

Under the subheading “Internal Background:”

> The RAIC [Resident Agent in Charge] of the Wilmington Resident
> Office reported that all agents in his office denied any
> involvement. The Politico reporter refused to provide any details on
> the source of the information or that he was in possession of any
> official document, where we were identified. The statement has been
> drafted to address any implication that anyone from the service was
> involved in this incident.
Under the subheading “Draft for Release:”

Statement from the U.S. Secret Service

> US Secret Service records confirm that the agency did not provide
> protection to any member of the Biden family in 2018, and that the
> Secret Service had no involvement in this alleged incident.
Later that day, Secret Service Director of Communications Catherine
Milhoan
[[link removed]]
forwards
[[link removed]]
the draft response for the _Politico_ reporter to Biden White House
spokeswoman Jen Psaki and White House Communications Director Kate
Bedingfield: “Kate/Jen, Good afternoon. For your awareness. We will
be releasing the statement at 4 p.m. Milhoan then sent the draft to
other USSS [Secret Service] officials, writing, “For your awareness
… as part of our standard ops here at the USSS … WH Comms also has
awareness of the query and our anticipated response.”

Milhoan then emails several senior Secret Service officials: “Thanks
all. DHS OPA [Department of Homeland Security Office of Public
Affairs] and WH Comms are tracking as well.”

After receiving the statement, the reporter replies
[[link removed]]
to the Communications Office, “Just to clarify. Did Secret Service
agents ever visit StarQuest Shooters & Survival Supply and request
records related to Hunter Biden?” A Secret Service official whose
name is redacted replies, “Ben, To reiterate, the Secret Service had
no involvement in this alleged incident.”

In a separate email
[[link removed]]
on February 24, 2021, the Special Agent in Charge of the Presidential
Protection Division, David Cho, emails six officials in the White
House, including “JOD” [likely Jen O’Malley Dillon
[[link removed]]],
“Just wanted to provide for awareness. Jen Psaki and Kate
Bedingfield were notified by our CMR [Communications and Media
Relations] on the below inquiry. Our response is also stated. In
summary – no records of the event ever occurring. Please advise if
you have any questions.”

On March 2, 2021, the _Politico_ reporter follows up
[[link removed]]
with additional questions to the Secret Service media office, which
sets off further internal Secret Service exchanges. Schrecklinger
asks:

> I just wanted to follow up with another couple of questions:
>
> Did Secret Service agents in Delaware do any work related to
> President Biden in the period between when his status as a protectee
> expired after his vice presidency and when it resumed during his
> most recent presidential campaign?
>
> For example, during this period, were Secret Service agents ever in
> touch with the Delaware State Police to arrange police details for
> Biden?
An official in the communications office whose name is redacted then
forwards the follow-up questions to an official in the Wilmington, DE,
office, whose name is also redacted: “Can you give me a call on the
below questions.”

Wilmington official replies, “I’ll give you a call in about an
hour.” The Wilmington official then forwards the email exchange to
James Henry
[[link removed]],
former SAC of the Philadelphia Field Office: “FYSA [For Your
Situational Awareness].”

On March 10, 2021, the reporter follows up again
[[link removed]]
with the Secret Service about their failure to respond to his
follow-up questions of March 2, writing, “Circling back on this. I
spoke to someone on your team about this last week and they said they
would get me a statement by the end of the day, but I haven’t seen
anything land. If you all want to weigh in on this, please get back to
me by the end of the day today.” An official in the Secret Service
Communications Office responds, “Ben, we have no additional
information to provide for this request.”

On March 25, 2021 Special Agent in Charge Benjamin Kramer, emails
[[link removed]]
then-Secret Service Assistant Director of Intergovernmental and
Legislative Affairs (IGL), Jeremy Sheridan, a copy of the March 25
_Politico_ article about Hunter Biden’s gun and cited the Secret
Service statement in the article
[[link removed]


> On Oct. 23, 2018, President Joe Biden’s son Hunter and daughter in
> law Hallie were involved in a bizarre incident in which Hallie took
> Hunter’s gun and threw it in a trash can behind a grocery store,
> only to return later to find it gone.
>
> Delaware police began investigating, concerned that the trash can
> was across from a high school and that the missing gun could be used
> in a crime …
>
> Arriving on the scene, Delaware State Police retrieved security
> camera footage from the store …
>
> But a curious thing happened at the time: Secret Service agents
> approached the owner of the store where Hunter bought the gun and
> asked to take the paperwork involving the sale, according to two
> people, one of whom has firsthand knowledge of the episode and the
> other was briefed by a Secret Service agent after the fact.

***

> The Federal Bureau of Investigation also responded to the scene,
> according to people familiar with the situation. At the time, the
> FBI was monitoring Hunter Biden as part of an investigation that
> remains ongoing and that currently focuses on his taxes. The FBI
> declined to comment.

***

> A Secret Service spokesperson said the agency has no record of
> involvement in the incident: “U.S. Secret Service records confirm
> that the agency did not provide protection to any member of the
> Biden family in 2018, and that the Secret Service had no involvement
> in this alleged incident.”
Kramer then asks Sheridan, “Confirming this is comment we can relay
if inquiries are made from Hill counterparts or if anything further
needs to be discussed (?).” Sheridan replied, “Yes, the comment as
provided in the article is our response to any inquiries.”

On March 25, 2021, Milhoan forwards
[[link removed]]
the _Politico_ article to several senior Secret Service officials:
“For your awareness … the article is total BS as we all know.
Leadership is aware and I will let you know if CMR [Office of
Communications and Media Relations] receives any queries.”

On March 26, 2021, _New York Post_ reporter Lorena Mongelli reaches
out
[[link removed]]
to the Secret Service Communications Office, asking for comment on
text messages on Hunter Biden’s lost laptop:

> It appears the text messages were sent from Hunter Biden in which he
> indicates that the Secret Service did in fact respond to the Oct.
> 23, 2018 [gun] incident. This information contradicts your previous
> statement relating to the incident and we would like to know whether
> the Secret Service would like to respond to these new findings.
A person from the Communications Office, whose name is redacted
replies: “We have received your inquiry, would you be able to
provide copies of these alleged text messages for reference?”
Mongelli responds:
The Daily Mail actually posted copies of the same text messages the NY
Post is referencing.

This is what one text message says:

“She stole the gun out of my trunk lock box and threw it in a
garbage can full to the top at Jansens [sic]. Then told me it was my
problem to deal with," Hunter wrote.

“Then when the police the FBI the secret service came on the scene
she said she took it from me because she was scared I would harm
myself due to o my drug and alcohol problem and our volatile
relationship and that she was afraid for the kids.”

***

> You can view images of the messages here:
>
[link removed]
In October 2020, _The Blaze_ reported
[[link removed]]
that in October 2018, Hunter Biden’s handgun was taken by Hallie
Biden, the widow of then-presidential nominee Joe Biden’s son Beau.
In 2021,_ Politico _reported
[[link removed]


> Hallie took Hunter’s gun and threw it in a trash can behind a
> grocery store, only to return later to find it gone.
>
> Delaware police began investigating, concerned that the trash can
> was across from a high school and that the missing gun could be used
> in a crime, according to law enforcement officials and a copy of the
> police report obtained by POLITICO.
>
> But a curious thing happened at the time: Secret Service agents
> approached the owner of the store where Hunter bought the gun and
> asked to take the paperwork involving the sale, according to two
> people, one of whom has firsthand knowledge of the episode and the
> other was briefed by a Secret Service agent after the fact.
The Secret Service initially responded
[[link removed]]
to our FOIA
request in this case on April 2, 2021, stating that it had located
potentially responsive records and would process them in accordance
with FOIA. Then, on October 13, 2022, the Secret Service said that the
April 2021 response was sent in error and that it did not have any
records responsive to the FOIA request.

Through FOIA, we have uncovered significant information about Hunter
Biden, who served on the board of directors
[[link removed]]
for Ukrainian energy firm Burisma Holdings despite having no previous
experience in the energy industry.

In October 2022, we filed a FOIA lawsuit
[[link removed]]
against
the Department of Justice for all records in the possession of FBI
Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Brian Auten regarding an August 6,
2020, briefing provided to members of the U.S. Senate. Ron Johnson
(R-WI) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) raised concerns that the briefing was
intended to undermine the senators’ investigation of Hunter Biden.

In December 2020, we received records
[[link removed]]
from the
State Department tying Hunter Biden’s Burisma Holdings’ lobbying
operation to an influence-peddling operation involving the Clinton
campaign during the 2016 election. Also uncovered were State
Department records
[[link removed]]
showing that former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie “Masha”
Yovanovitch had specifically warned in 2017 about corruption
allegations against Burisma Holdings.

In October 2020, State Department records
[[link removed]]
that
included a briefing checklist of a February 22, 2019, meeting in Kyiv
between then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch and Sally
Painter, co-founder and chief operating officer of Blue Star
Strategies, a Democratic lobbying firm which was hired by Burisma
Holdings to combat corruption allegations
[[link removed])].
The briefing checklist notes that Painter also planned to meet
[[link removed]]
with Foreign Commercial Service (FCS) Officer Martin Claessens
“regarding the Burisma Group energy company.” (Painter was
implicated in the Clinton-era fundraisingscandal
[[link removed]]
exposed
by Judicial Watch that involved the alleged sale of seats on Commerce
Department trade missions to Democratic National Committee donors.)

In September 2020, State Department records
[[link removed]]
include
a January 17, 2017, email from George Kent, the Obama
administration’s deputy assistant secretary of state in charge of
Ukraine policy, which was copied to then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine
Marie Yovanovitch, highlighting Russia-linked media “trolling” Joe
Biden over “his son’s business.” An email
[[link removed]]
was sent four days prior to the inauguration of President Donald Trump
to a redacted recipient and CCd to Yovanovitch with the subject line
“medvedchuk-linked vesti trolls Biden.” Kent writes: “Burisma
– gift that keeps on giving. (With medvedchuk affiliated Vesti
pushing the troll like storyline on visit day)”

In June 2020, U.S. Secret Service records
[[link removed]]
showed that, for
the first five and a half years of the Obama administration, Hunter
Biden traveled extensively while receiving a Secret Service protective
detail. During the time period of the records provided, Hunter Biden
took 411 separate domestic and international flights, including to 29
different foreign countries. He visited China five times.

We are also suing
[[link removed]]
the DHS for Secret Service records on Hunter Biden’s travel and
security costs, and suing
[[link removed]]
the State Department for messages sent through the SMART
[[link removed]]
(State Messaging and Archive Retrieval Toolkit) system that mention
Hunter Biden.

U.S. AND UK HEALTH ADMINISTRATORS HAD A ‘CONFIDENTIALITY
AGREEMENT’ TIED TO VACCINE ADVERSE EVENTS

We continue to find out more about concerns at the highest levels
regarding the COVID-19 vaccine.

We received records from the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) that show a discussion between U.S. and UK health
regulators that occurred just two days prior to FDA approval of the
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine regarding “anaphylaxis
[[link removed]
with the regulators emphasizing their “mutual confidentiality
agreement.”

We obtained the records a FOIA lawsuit
[[link removed]]
against HHS
(_Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services_
[[link removed]]
(No. 1:22-cv-00660)) after the FDA, which is an agency of HHS, failed
to respond to an August 30, 2021, FOIA request for:

> All emails sent to and from members of the Vaccines and Related
> Biological Products Advisory Committee regarding adverse events,
> deaths and/or injuries caused by investigatory vaccines for the
> prevention or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and/or COVID-19 currently
> produced by Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and/or Johnson & Johnson.
The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee
(VRBPAC
[[link removed]])
is the U.S. government’s central advisory body, along with Advisory
Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP
[[link removed]]),
advising whether to
approve COVID vaccines.

A lengthy, heavily redacted December 2020 email exchange
[[link removed]]
shows U.S. and UK health officials placing a heavy emphasis on their
“mutual confidentiality agreement” in a discussion regarding
“anaphylactoid reactions” to the COVID vaccine.

The exchange is initiated by Jonathan Mogford, policy director of the
UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency and is sent
to Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock as well as Peter Marks,
director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER).
The subject line and body of the email are fully redacted under FOIA
Exemption B3 (relating to statutory prohibitions).

As background, Mogford includes information on “two cases of
anaphylactoid reactions in individuals with a strong past history of
allergic reactions….” Marks replies to Mogford: “It would be
very helpful if our Office of Vaccines could receive additional
details [redacted] from MHRA [UK Medicines and Healthcare Products
Regulatory Agency] under the terms of our mutual confidentiality
agreement.” Mogford later replies, “… attached are [redacted]
hope that’s helpful in the meantime. If I can just remind –
information shared under our confidentiality agreement.”

Marion Gruber, then head of the Office of Vaccines Research and Review
(OVRR), replies to Mogford, “Thank you so much for this information.
Our emails crossed. If possible, would be available for a t-con
[teleconference] today?” The exchange concludes with OVRR Deputy
Director Phil Krause advising UK Medicines and Healthcare Products
Regulatory Agency official Jamie Convisser, “Your summary is
correct. I’m cc:ing Amanda Cohn at CDC who can provide the most
up-to-date details about [redacted]. Obviously, [redacted], not all of
this is public so please hold these details confidential.” Cohn then
replies to Mogford, and includes an attachment titled “Anaphylaxis
CLARK Dec 19 2020 Final”. She writes, “I am adding my colleagues
Tom Clark and Stacey Martin, we are happy to share more information
with you. Attached are slides that were presented at a public meeting
on Saturday. [Redacted].”

The FDA issued its Emergency Use Authorization
[[link removed]]
for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine for individuals 16 years of age
and older on December 11, 2020.

On May 14, 2021, the CDC’s Dr. Amanda Cohn emailed
[[link removed]]
Office of Vaccines Research and Review Director Marion Gruber and
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Director Peter Marks with
the subject line “Coadministration of COVID-19 Vaccines with Other
Vaccines During Pregnancy.”

Gruber writes, “I am fine with this language.” Marks then responds
to Cohn and her CDC colleague, Sarah Mbaeyi, “I can live with this
too. Please let me know if you want to connect about the adverse event
issue later today. Seems like work is still ongoing, but let me know.
Thanks.” Cohn replies, “We have a meeting with Rochelle
[presumably CDC Director Rochelle Walensky] at 3:30 about if we should
say anything or wait until we have more definitive information. I will
let you know where we land. I’m not sure there is a right answer.”

It again took a lawsuit for the Biden administration to hand over,
albeit heavily redacted, information regarding the safety of the COVID
vaccines that the public has every right to know. This disturbing
batch of new documents has uncovered a secret confidentiality
agreement tied to COVID vaccine safety issues and emails that raise
new questions about the vaccines and pregnancy.

We are pursuing challenges against the agency’s redactions under
FOIA.

In a previous production from this FOIA lawsuit, we received 1,081
pages
[[link removed]]
of
records from HHS detailing internal discussions about myocarditis and
the COVID vaccine. Other documents detailed adverse “events for
which a contributory effect of the vaccine could not be excluded.”
Through FOIA, we have uncovered a substantial amount of information
about COVID-19 issues:

* HHS records
[[link removed]]
regarding data Moderna submitted to the FDA on its mRNA COVID-19
vaccine, indicated a “statistically significant” number of rats
were born with skeletal deformations after their mothers were injected
with the vaccine. The documents also reveal Moderna elected not to
conduct a number of standard pharmacological studies on the laboratory
test animals.
* FDA records detailed pressure
[[link removed]]
for
COVID-19 vaccine booster approval and use.
* NIH records revealed
[[link removed]]
an FBI
“inquiry” into the NIH’s controversial bat coronavirus grant
tied to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The records also show
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
officials were concerned about “gain-of-function” research in
China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2016. The Fauci agency was
also concerned about EcoHealth Alliance’s
[[link removed]
of compliance with reporting
rules and use of gain-of-function research in the NIH-funded research
involving bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, China.
* HHS records revealed that from 2014 to 2019, $826,277
[[link removed]]
was given to the
Wuhan Institute of Virology for bat coronavirus research by the NIAID.
* NIAID records showed that it gave nine China-related grants to
EcoHealth Alliance
[[link removed]]
to research
coronavirus emergence in bats and was the NIH’s top issuer of grants
to the Wuhan lab itself. The records also included an email from the
vice director of the Wuhan Lab asking an NIH official for help finding
disinfectants for decontamination of airtight suits and indoor
surfaces.
* HHS records included an “urgent for Dr. Fauci
[[link removed]]
” email chain,
citing ties between the Wuhan lab and the taxpayer-funded EcoHealth
Alliance
[[link removed]].
The government emails
also reported that the foundation of U.S. billionaire Bill Gates
worked closely with the Chinese government to pave the way for
Chinese-produced medications to be sold outside China and help
“raise China’s voice of governance by placing representatives from
China on important international counsels as high-level commitment
from China.”
* HHS records included a grant application for research involving
the coronavirus that appears to describe “gain-of-function
[[link removed]
research involving RNA extractions from bats, experiments on viruses,
attempts to develop a chimeric virus and efforts to genetically
manipulate the full-length bat SARSr-CoV WIV1 strain molecular clone.
* HHS records showed the State Department and NIAID knew immediately
in January 2020 that China was withholding COVID data
[[link removed]],
which was
hindering risk assessment and response by public health officials.
* University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) records
[[link removed]]
showed the former director of the Galveston National Laboratory at the
University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Dr. James W. Le Duc
[[link removed]]
warned Chinese
researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology of potential
investigations into the COVID issue by Congress.
* HHS records regarding biodistribution studies and related data for
the COVID-19 vaccines showed a key component of the vaccines developed
by Pfizer/BioNTech, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), were found outside the
injection site
[[link removed]],
mainly the liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries of test animals,
eight to 48 hours after injection.
* Records from the Federal Select Agent Program (FSAP) revealed
safety lapses
[[link removed]]
and violations at U.S. biosafety laboratories that conduct research on
dangerous agents and toxins.
* HHS records included emails
[[link removed]]
between National Institutes of Health (NIH) then-Director Francis
Collins
[[link removed]]
and Anthony
Fauci, the director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases (NIAID), about hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19.
* HHS records showed that NIH officials tailored confidentiality
forms
[[link removed]]
to China’s
terms and that the World Health Organization (WHO) conducted an
unreleased, “strictly confidential” COVID-19 epidemiological
analysis in January 2020.
* Fauci emails
[[link removed]]
included his approval of a press release supportive of China’s
response to the 2019 novel coronavirus.


JUDICIAL WATCH SUES THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT FOR USING MARINES FOR
BIDEN SPEECH ATTACKING AMERICAN

It was one of the more bizarre pieces of political theater of our time
– our president, flanked by two marines, standing before a
red-drenched background gave a divisive speech, condemning supporters
of President Trump.

Speaking on September 1, Biden claimed Trump supporters “represent
an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.”
Biden was widely criticized for using the Marines as props during the
political speech
[[link removed]]
in which he also called “MAGA Republicans” a threat to democracy.

The Defense Department isn’t eager to explain itself here, so we are
in court to get the details of this misuse of our military.

We filed our Freedom of Information Ace (FOIA) lawsuit against the
Department of Defense for records about the use of U.S. Marines for
President Joe Biden’s controversial September 1, 2022, campaign
speech in Philadelphia (_Judicial Watch vs. U.S. Department of
Defense_
[[link removed]]
(No. 1:23-cv-00213)).

We sued after the Department of Defense failed to comply with our
October 31, 2022, FOIA request for all communications within the
Office of the Secretary of Defense, Secretary of the Navy, Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs, and Commandant of Marine Corps – and those shared
with the White House Military Office and Office of the President –
regarding Marines standing behind the President during his September
1, 2022, speech in Philadelphia.

Biden’s infamous “Red Speech,” which included the abuse of our
Marines in its totalitarian imagery, painted a target on Trump and
tens of millions of Americans for political suppression and worse.
And, to make matters worse, the Pentagon is violating federal law by
hiding records about Biden’s misuse of our military in his attempt
to intimidate Americans.

Until next week …





[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


<a
href="[link removed]"
target="_blank"><img
src="[link removed]"
style="width:100%;height:auto;" alt="advertisement"></a>

[32x32x1]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x2]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800
Washington, DC 20024

202.646.5172



© 2017 - 2023, All Rights Reserved
Manage Email Subscriptions
[[link removed]]
|
Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]

View in browser
[[link removed]]