Journalist arrested in Ohio for covering a news conference

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
Dear friend of press freedom,

Here are some of the most important stories we’re following from the U.S. and around the world. If you enjoy reading this newsletter, please forward it to friends and family. If someone has forwarded you this newsletter, please subscribe here ([link removed]) .

Jimmy Emerson, DVM. Latah County Courthouse, Moscow, Idaho

An Idaho judge presiding over a high-profile quadruple murder trial caused chaos by entering an overbroad and incomprehensible gag order. Everyone from the mayor to the police chief has cited the order in refusing to talk to the press about the national news story, and numerous agencies have cited the order in denying open records requests.

In extreme situations, judges have limited power to gag parties and attorneys appearing before them. The Idaho judge, however, went far out of bounds by gagging everyone from law enforcement personnel to attorneys representing victims. She even implied that others not specifically mentioned in her order might also be censored.

We wrote on our blog ([link removed]) about the dangers of unconstitutional gag orders and the need for qualified judges who understand and value the First Amendment.


** Journalist arrested for reporting at a press conference
------------------------------------------------------------

Trespassing generally means being on someone else’s property without permission. It seems obvious, then, that a journalist can’t trespass by reporting from a press conference to which they were invited for that exact purpose.

Tell that to law enforcement officers in East Palestine, Ohio, who arrested NewsNation Correspondent Evan Lambert ([link removed]) at Gov. Mike DeWine’s news conference regarding a train derailment. Officers reportedly ordered Lambert to not broadcast while the governor was speaking. They demanded he leave the conference, and then tackled and handcuffed him.

There is, of course, no law against broadcasting while the governor is speaking. The arrest would have been unconstitutional even if DeWine had ordered it, but the governor says he has no problem with journalists reporting during his press conferences.

It seems this was a case of power-tripping officers lashing out at Lambert for not immediately obeying them. But as an appellate court once explained ([link removed]) in another case involving the wrongful arrest of a journalist, a police officer “is not a law unto himself; he cannot give an order that has no colorable legal basis and then arrest a person who defies it.” Prosecutors should drop all charges — and Lambert should sue.


** Officials continue to disregard open records laws
------------------------------------------------------------

Last week we wrote about ([link removed]) the increasingly creative excuses officials think up to weasel their ways out of open records laws and transparency in general. The trend shows no sign of slowing down. New York, for example, became the latest state to repeal COVID restrictions for everyone but journalists ([link removed]) , allowing legislators to operate outside earshot of the press.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis — who spent his week on an anti-press crusade ([link removed]) — claimed “executive privilege” to evade a request for communications with the “six or seven pretty big legal conservative heavyweights” he has said help him choose judges for the Florida Supreme Court. Somehow a judge went along with it ([link removed]) , despite the privilege’s non-existence.

Hopefully, that ruling will be overturned. But if there were an executive privilege, there certainly could not be a legislative one as well — otherwise there’s hardly anyone left besides bureaucrats to remain subject to open records laws.

Not so fast, says the Washington State Legislature ([link removed]) , which had to reveal in response to another records request that, since 2021, 22 legislators’ records have been withheld from requesters pursuant to the “legislative privilege.” The problem is that the provision of the state constitution cited for the purported privilege says nothing whatsoever about public records.

Officials presumably know the privileges they’re claiming don’t exist, but they also know they can buy time while the courts consider their baseless objections at taxpayer expense. It won’t change until they face political and financial consequences.


** What we're reading
------------------------------------------------------------

DeSantis floats bill making it easier to sue news outlets ([link removed]) . DeSantis, sitting at a fake news anchor’s desk, hosted an hour-long media-bashing roundtable this week. He and his guests discussed half-baked ideas for reining in alleged defamation by the news media, like creating a presumption that reporters who cite anonymous sources harbor the “actual malice ([link removed]) ” required for a public official to sue for defamation. If DeSantis is concerned about anonymous sourcing then, rather than punishing journalists, he should enhance whistleblower protections so that sources can come forward in their own names without fearing retaliation.

High and low roads of access in Virginia attacked in First Amendment litigation ([link removed]) . Virginia allows government employees and lawyers easy online access to court records but makes others, including journalists, go to the courthouse to retrieve them. Worse yet, it restrains those with access from sharing the records — or even discussing them — with us commoners. The scheme serves no purpose besides extracting fees from the press and public. We commend Courthouse News Service for challenging this unconstitutional prior restraint.

C-SPAN’s access is once again limited in Kevin McCarthy’s House. Will that change? ([link removed]) Representatives from both political parties want C-SPAN to control its own cameras like it did during the speakership negotiations. Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) and Demand Progress Education Fund led a coalition ([link removed]) of over 40 organizations requesting that Speaker McCarthy restore C-SPAN’s control. C-SPAN wrote its own letter requesting the same. There has been no principled opposition to providing Americans with a better view of their representatives in action. McCarthy’s resistance to this bipartisan no-brainer is perplexing.

— Seth Stern, Director of Advocacy
Donate to support our work ([link removed])
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

============================================================
Copyright © 2023 Freedom of the Press Foundation, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
Freedom of the Press Foundation
49 Flatbush Ave, #1017
Brooklyn, NY 11217
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.