We have repeatedly asked for data following claims made in PMQs on 18 January.

3 Feb 2023 | Full Fact's weekly news
View in your browser ([link removed])
FACT CHECK
The government has failed to back up PM's claims about A&E patient flow

During Prime Minister’s Questions on 18 January, Rishi Sunak made a number of claims about how the government was working to improve ambulance waiting times, including that it was “ensuring the flow of patients through emergency care is faster than ever” and “discharging people at a record rate out of hospitals”. This exchange was also later shared by the Conservative party Twitter account.

Over the past two weeks we’ve repeatedly asked the government what Mr Sunak was referring to in these comments, but we have not been given any data which supports the claims.

Anyone making serious claims in public debate should be prepared to back up their claims with evidence, and that should clearly apply to the Prime Minister making a high-profile claim about a key issue such as this. So it’s disappointing that neither Number 10 nor the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) have offered any figures to back up Mr Sunak’s specific claim, or even explained exactly what he meant.

The Nuffield Trust suggested Mr Sunak may have been referring to data showing the total volume of patients attending A&E in England in December 2022 was the highest on record, at over 2.28 million ([link removed]) .

But it also told us: “We do think ‘ensuring the flow of patients through emergency care is faster than ever’ makes it sound as though people are being seen, treated and leaving A&E faster than before, which is not the case.”

A&E waits of over four hours, for example, are at record levels.

As for discharges, more medically fit patients have been discharged from hospitals this winter than last winter. But the proportion of medically fit patients being discharged is lower.
PM must back up hospital care claims ([link removed])
FACT CHECK


** UKIP deputy minister makes false claim about age of unaccompanied children seeking asylum ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

During an appearance on GB News last week, the deputy leader of UKIP, Rebecca Jane, claimed that in 2020 54% of unaccompanied asylum seeking children “actually turned out to be adults”, and that in 2022 this figure was over 70%.

A clip of the appearance was also shared by the party’s Facebook page ([link removed]) , with a caption featuring slightly different figures, which said: “In 2020, 50% of ‘child’ asylum claims turned out to be grown men. In 2022 that figure is now 72%.”

In 2020, just over half of all resolved age dispute cases involved asylum seekers who were ultimately found to be over 18. But it’s not correct to refer to these cases as the percentage of all unaccompanied asylum seeking children (UASC) who turn out to be adults, as the age is not disputed in the majority of UASC applications.

Data for 2022 shows that 3,624 asylum applications were made by lone children, and 514 (14%) were found to be adults.

UKIP hasn’t responded to Full Fact’s request to provide the source for this claim, but it appears to be based on a misinterpretation of figures for age dispute cases.

An “age disputed person ([link removed]) ” is an individual seeking permission to stay in the UK who, in the view of a Home Office or local authority official, does not have sufficient evidence to prove their age.

The figure given for 2022 also appears to be too high even as a percentage of age dispute cases, and we don’t know how many were men, as age dispute figures are not broken down by gender.
What do Home Office statistics tell us? ([link removed])
Job: Software Engineer ([link removed])
We’re recruiting for a new Software Engineer.

Help us make sure those who make false claims in public debate can’t get away with it. You’ll tackle internet scale problems with a global user base, helping us make a difference in our fight against bad information.

The role is remote first, with an office available in central London.

Applications close 6 February.
Apply now ([link removed])
FACT CHECK


** Police Scotland hasn’t renamed paedophiles as ‘minor attracted people’ ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

A video ([link removed]) being shared on Facebook claims that Scotland has renamed paedophiles “minor attracted people”. The background of the video shows a screenshot of an article ([link removed]) with the headline “Scotland Police Rename Pedophiles As “Minor Attracted People” at Direction of EU”.

The article points to a report from Police Scotland on policing performance which used the phrase “minor-attracted people” instead of paedophiles. The use of this phrase in the policing performance report was also covered by the Telegraph ([link removed]) , the Sun ([link removed]) , MailOnline ([link removed]) and the Independent ([link removed]) .

However, in a statement ([link removed]) on 31 December ([link removed]) , Police Scotland said media reporting had misrepresented their position on the term “minor-attracted person”.

Detective Chief Superintendent Sam Faulds, Head of Public Protection for Police Scotland, said: “Police Scotland does not use the term Minor-Attracted Person to describe this type of offender and any suggestion otherwise completely misrepresents our position.

“The term referenced in a Police Scotland report in June 2022 was quoted from proposal documents for the establishment of the Horizon Project, a European consortium to tackle child sexual abuse and exploitation.

“At the first meeting of the consortium, in Warsaw in September 2022, Police Scotland officers successfully lobbied for the MAP term to be removed from recognised terminology used by more than 20 European partners.

“Our view was that the term was entirely unacceptable in describing someone either involved in sexual offending against children or who has indecent thoughts towards them.”
Find out more ([link removed])
MORE FACT CHECKS
Also this week...
* No evidence Diane Abbott said quote about "the problem with Britain" ([link removed])
* How wages and pensions in the UK and France compare ([link removed])
* BBC didn't 'censor' footage of Brexit march ([link removed])

Read our latest fact checks ([link removed])
Stop the spread of bad information

Find these updates useful? We'd be incredibly grateful if you could share our fact checks and help more people access good information.
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed] https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Fhealth%2Fbbc-malhotra-vaccines-excess-deaths%2F Tweet ([link removed] https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Fhealth%2Fbbc-malhotra-vaccines-excess-deaths%2F)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
All the best,
Team Full Fact

============================================================
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
** Like us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
Have any questions or feedback? Please ** get in touch via our contact form ([link removed])
. We do not respond to direct replies to this email address.

Find out ** how Full Fact is funded ([link removed])
.

Copyright © Full Fact 2023 - All rights reserved

A registered charity (no. 1158683) and a non-profit company (no. 6975984) limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales.

Our mailing address is:
17 Oval Way, London, SE11 5RR

We use Mailchimp to send you our emails and to see which articles are most popular. ** Read our privacy policy ([link removed])
or ** Mailchimp's privacy policy ([link removed])

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
** update subscription preferences ([link removed])