Executive branch usurping congressional authority

[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fimmigration-parole-explained Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fimmigration-parole-explained)
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
Immigration Parole Explained ([link removed])
Executive branch usurping congressional authority
Follow Parsing Immigration Policy on Ricochet ([link removed]) , Apple Podcasts ([link removed]) , Amazon Music ([link removed]) , Spotify ([link removed]) , Stitcher ([link removed]) , Google Podcasts ([link removed]) or use the podcast's RSS Feed ([link removed])

Washington, D.C. (February 2, 2023) – In early January the Biden administration, without the approval of Congress, announced a new immigration program, granting parole to 360,000 foreign nationals from Haiti, Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. In this week’s episode of Parsing Immigration Policy ([link removed]) , the Center for Immigration Studies’ Andrew Arthur joins host Mark Krikorian to put this Biden expansion of parole authority in context, citing the creation of the parole authority, later congressional limitations, and historical use by the executive.

The Biden administration continues to abuse parole authority at an ever increasing rate. Parole was established by Congress to provide authorization for the executive – in very narrow circumstances – to allow foreign nationals into the country who are inadmissible by law. Over the last two years, a Democratic-controlled Congress limited the amount of detention space for illegal aliens at the request of the Biden administration, which then used the lack of space as an excuse to release illegal migrants into the country who are mandated by law to be detained.

Without action from Congress, states have had to take on this executive overreach in court, protecting the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution. But the Biden administration began the new parole program despite two court challenges to the executive abuse of parole, Texas v. Biden and Florida v. United States. Now the administration is being sued by 20 states for its latest parole program, in Texas v. DHS ([link removed]) .

State court cases have brought the third branch of government, the judicial branch, into the immigration policy arena despite SCOTUS being very clear that immigration policy is the role of the legislative branch. Will Congress cede its authority on immigration to the executive? Will the new Republican House majority cut off funding for all parole programs?

In his closing commentary, host Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center, draws attention to the case of an Iranian national who was apprehended trying to cross the border in the trunk of a car. There has been conflicting information on whether he is on a terror watch list, but Krikorian explains that it doesn’t really matter – either way, Iranians being smuggled across the border represent a national security problem.
Visit Website ([link removed])
Donate ([link removed])
Related Articles:

Biden Administration’s Game of Border Whac-a-Mole ([link removed])
Texas, 19 Other States, Sue Over Biden’s Parole Plan ([link removed])
The Pernicious Perversion of Parole ([link removed])
The Most Important Immigration Rulings in 2022 and the Forecast for 2023 ([link removed])

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** [link removed] ([link removed])
** Google Plus ([link removed])
** LinkedIn ([link removed])
** RSS ([link removed])
Copyright © 2023 Center for Immigration Studies, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
Center for Immigration Studies
1629 K St., NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20006
USA

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.

** View this e-mail in your browser. ([link removed])

This is the Center for Immigration Studies CISNews e-mail list.