To view this email as a web page, click here

.
AEI's weekly digest of top commentary and scholarship on the issues that matter most

School Choice Is on the March

Personalizing Education and Empowering Parents

January 28, 2023

This past week, Iowa became the third state to let all families spend state funds on their children’s education. Robert Pondiscio says it’s just the latest victory for an ascendant school choice movement. “It’s no longer unthinkable,” writes Pondiscio, “that the American paradigm of sending our children to local, district-run public schools might be challenged.”

 

 

In the newest report from AEI’s Conservative Education Reform Network, Paul Carrese proposes that state-funded civic institutes could change the academic landscape at American universities. According to Carrese, these institutions—like the program he directs at Arizona State University—are bastions for educational freedom and liberal learning.

 

Naomi Schaefer Riley challenges a popular notion among progressive activists that direct cash aid alone can solve problems faced by children in poverty. As these activists rally to dismantle child protective services, Schaefer Riley argues that child maltreatment has far more complex root causes that require different solutions.

 

James C. Capretta summarizes the health-related provisions passed in the December 2022 omnibus bill. “The wide range of health-related matters addressed in the December omnibus deal,” he writes, “will lessen the pressure for immediate action in the current Congress.”

 

Nicholas Eberstadt and his coauthors present a national strategy for countering North Korea. The coauthors state that North Korea’s growing nuclear threat, despite persistent US diplomacy over three decades, means “it is imperative to design and implement a new, comprehensive strategy that incorporates all available tools of statecraft.”

 

Boomerang Children and Parental Retirement Outcomes

In a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, Grant M. Seiter, Sita Nataraj Slavov, and Mary J. Lopez analyze how retirees fare economically when their adult “boomerang” children return to live at home. Seiter, Slavov, and Lopez find that these boomerang children often return home after shocks disrupting their income, employment, or marriage, and so their stays at home are mostly transitory. Most notably, the coauthors observe that parents, especially men, whose adult children return home are more likely to report working full-time after age 65. The coauthors conclude that boomerang children may delay their parents’ retirement decisions but do not affect their parents’ immediate career decisions, wealth, health, or well-being.

 

 

More from AEI
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Assessing China’s Likely Use of Military Power Against Taiwan in 2023

Michael Mazza
Global Taiwan Institute

Science Skepticism Has Grown. Who’s to Blame?

Frederick M. Hess
Education Week

Checking the American Presidency

Philip Wallach
Law & Liberty

Can the Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China’s Home-Field Advantage Challenge Boeing’s 737?

Claude Barfield and Matthew Glavish
AEIdeas

Biden’s Uphill Battle with Working-Class Voters

Ruy Teixeira
Washington Post

PODCASTS AND VIDEOS

What You Need to Know About the Debt Ceiling

James Pethokoukis and Michael R. Strain
Political Economy

What Is the House GOP Doing on National Security?

Marc A. Thiessen, Danielle Pletka, and Hugh Hewitt
What the Hell Is Going On?

The Untold Truths of Kenosha

Naomi Schaefer Riley, Ian Rowe, and Rob Montz
Are You Kidding Me?

The Optimism and Pessimism Toward Zeitenwende

Giselle Donnelly et al.
The Eastern Front

A Conversation with Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX): China, Russia, and America’s Military Readiness

Hal Brands
AEI event

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

In the newer progressive understanding, some groups are sinful, and some are not. This unleashes a new form of political activism. To be specific, it encourages a form of politics that is collectivist, utopian, and revolutionary—really an ersatz religion. We have seen their kind before. It does not end well.

Colin Dueck