From FactCheck.org <[email protected]>
Subject The U.S. After Two Years of President Biden
Date January 27, 2023 1:30 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
View this email in your browser ([link removed])
An update from FactCheck.org
Official White House Photo by Adam Schultz


** The U.S. After Two Years of President Biden
------------------------------------------------------------

As of Jan. 20, President Joe Biden had been in office a full two years. How is the country doing under the Democratic president?

We provide some answers to that question in "Biden's Numbers, January 2023 Update, ([link removed]) " which includes data from when Biden took the oath of office on Jan. 20, 2021, through Jan. 20 of this year.

The article -- which is the latest in our quarterly reports -- is always chock-full of information. Some of it confirms what you know or suspect, but some of it runs counter to partisan narratives.

Republicans frequently complain that Biden has "shut down ([link removed]) " U.S. oil production. But under Biden, crude oil production in the United States has increased by 4%.

On the other hand, Biden has failed to live up to his promise to substantially increase the number of refugees the U.S. admits every year. The U.S. has admitted 42,223 refugees in Biden’s first full 23 months in office, or 1,836 refugees per month. That’s slightly less than the 1,845 monthly average during the four years under former President Donald Trump.

Among other things, our reporters also look at carbon emissions, the trade deficit, corporate profits, health insurance, food stamps, judiciary appointments, gun sales and border security.
HOW WE KNOW
When writing "Biden's Numbers," we use statistics from the most authoritative and up-to-date sources available. That includes the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Congressional Budget Office, the Federal Reserve Board, the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Census Bureau, the Energy Information Administration, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Treasury, United States Courts -- to name a few. Read more ([link removed]) .
FEATURED FACT
At polio's peak in 1952, there were nearly 58,000 cases in the U.S., including more than 3,000 deaths and 21,000 instances of mild or disabling paralysis. With widespread vaccination, polio cases quickly plummeted. In 1960, 2,525 paralytic cases were reported in the U.S. — a decline of nearly 90% from 1952 — and there were just 61 cases in 1965, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Read more ([link removed]) .
WORTHY OF NOTE
This is News Literacy Week ([link removed]) . To mark the occasion, WTXL-TV in Tallahassee, Florida, ran a segment Jan. 24 on how to reduce the flow of misinformation.

Morning anchor Jasmine Monroe interviewed several experts, including our director, Eugene Kiely, who spoke about the importance of combatting consequential deceptions.

"There are consequences to misinformation," Eugene said. "It undermines democracy. It undermines critical institutions, including those that protect our public health." You can view the segment and read a story about it here ([link removed]) .
REPLY ALL

Reader: Why do you spell "black" with a capital B, but spell "white" with a lowercase W?

FactCheck.org Managing Editor Lori Robertson: Like many news organizations, we follow the Associated Press Stylebook, which made the decision to start capitalizing “Black” when used as an adjective “in a racial, ethnic or cultural sense” in June 2020. The AP Stylebook says: “Use of the capitalized Black recognizes that language has evolved, along with the common understanding that especially in the United States, the term reflects a shared identity and culture rather than a skin color alone.”

Many other news organizations, including the New York Times ([link removed]) , Washington Post ([link removed]) , Wall Street Journal ([link removed]) , USA Today ([link removed]) , CNN ([link removed]) and Fox News ([link removed]) , also made the decision around the same time to capitalize “Black.” The New York Times noted in aJune 2020 article ([link removed]) that there had been a campaign for years by Black scholars and writers for the capitalization. In the summer of 2020, nationwide protests against racial injustice –
sparked by the killing of George Floyd, a Black man, by a white Minneapolis police officer – led some media organizations to examine whether they should make this style change.

Times Executive Editor Dean Baquet and Associate Managing Editor for Standards Phil Corbett said in a staff memo ([link removed]) : “We believe this style best conveys elements of shared history and identity, and reflects our goal to be respectful of all the people and communities we cover.”

While the capitalized “Black” in the context of race has gained wide acceptance in the media, news outlets have differed on whether to also capitalize “white.” The AP decided not to do so, and we are following its guidance – though the AP could revisit the issue.

“We agree that white people’s skin color plays into systemic inequalities and injustices, and we want our journalism to robustly explore these problems,” John Daniszewski, the AP’s vice president for standards, said in announcing ([link removed]) the AP’s decision. “But capitalizing the term white, as is done by white supremacists, risks subtly conveying legitimacy to such beliefs.”

The Times similarly said ([link removed]) that “white doesn’t represent a shared culture and history in the way Black does, and also has long been capitalized by hate groups.”

But Fox News, Washington Post, CNN and others did conclude that “white” should be capitalized. In an article on its decision, Fox News said ([link removed]) : “This noteworthy style change ensures terms such as ‘Black’ and ‘White’ are consistent with FOX News Media style for other words used to describe racial and ethnic groups, such as Asian, African American, Latino, Hispanic and Native American – which are also capitalized.”

In its announcement, the Post noted ([link removed]) it would not always capitalize these words: “Separately, political terms used to promote racist ideologies or to advocate ethnic superiority or separation should remain lowercase (i.e. white supremacist, black nationalist).”

The AP said it “checked with a variety of experts and sources in making its decision.” Daniszewski also said the AP “will closely watch how usage and thought evolves, and will periodically review our decision.”


** Wrapping Up
------------------------------------------------------------

Here's what else we've got for you this week:
* "Viral Tweet Misrepresents NOAA Report on Rising Global Temperature ([link removed]) ": The warming trend in global temperature continued in 2022, which was the sixth-warmest year on record, according to a recent report from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. But a viral tweet — using just a small segment of a NOAA graph — wrongly claimed the agency had announced a “global cooling” trend.
* "Magic Johnson Did Not Contract HIV from a Vaccine, Contrary to Online Claim ([link removed]) ": Since his diagnosis in 1991, NBA player Magic Johnson has repeatedly said he contracted HIV through sexual transmission. But a viral social media post by a spreader of vaccine misinformation falsely claims that Johnson was exposed to the virus from a hepatitis B vaccine.
* "Social Media Posts Twist Meaning of CDC, FDA Disclosure on Bivalent Booster ([link removed]) ": Government health agencies disclosed a potential safety concern for strokes in those 65 and older with one of the COVID-19 vaccines, but the agencies haven’t found any causal relationship and the concern was flagged by just one of several monitoring systems. Anti-vaccine campaigners, however, have wrongly claimed the agencies have found a link between the boosters and strokes.
* "Posts Misinterpret NYC Health Tweet About Omicron Subvariant XBB.1.5 ([link removed]) ": An unclear tweet from New York City health officials was meant to caution residents that the latest omicron subvariant, XBB.1.5, might be more likely than previous variants to infect vaccinated or previously infected people. Social media posts misinterpreted the tweet to mean that vaccinated people were at higher risk than unvaccinated people.
* "Posts Mislead on Illinois SAFE-T Act and Elimination of Cash Bail ([link removed]) ": Illinois’ new criminal justice law, known as the SAFE-T Act, would eliminate cash bail but allow a judge to detain anyone who is deemed a danger to others or a flight risk. Social media posts misleadingly claim that anyone arrested for serious crimes, including second-degree murder, “will be let out free.”
* "Polio Elimination Due to Vaccination, Not End of Pesticide Use ([link removed]) ": Polio, a paralytic disease caused by a virus, has been eliminated in the U.S. — and nearly wiped out globally — thanks to vaccines. But social media posts are reviving old, false claims that polio is instead caused by pesticides and outbreaks of the disease ended when people stopped using DDT.

Y lo que publicamos en español ([link removed]) (English versions are accessible in each story):
* "Las muertes de atletas no han aumentado, contrariamente a lo que afirman activistas antivacunas ([link removed]) ": Expertos en medicina deportiva afirman que las muertes súbitas o lesiones cardíacas entre atletas en EE. UU. no han aumentado desde que las vacunas contra el COVID-19 están disponibles. Sin embargo, activistas antivacunas que comparan cifras poco fiables con un estudio no relacionado, vuelven a difundir un relato falso sobre la seguridad de las vacunas tras el paro cardíaco del jugador de la NFL, Damar Hamlin.
* "Las vacunas contra el COVID-19 se probaron en ensayos clínicos, a pesar de las afirmaciones falsas en las redes sociales ([link removed]) ": Las vacunas contra el COVID-19 se probaron en amplios ensayos controlados y aleatorizados realizados antes de que la Administración de Alimentos y Medicamentos de EE. UU. las autorizara para uso de emergencia. Pero un popular video en YouTube inventa una teoría conspirativa que distorsiona los códigos legales para afirmar falsamente lo contrario.

Do you like FactCheck.Weekly? Share it with a friend! They can subscribe here ([link removed]) .
Donate to Support Our Work ([link removed])

============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
We'll show up in your inbox every Friday with this fact-focused rundown. But you can message us any day of the week with questions or comments: [email protected].
Copyright © 2023 FactCheck.org, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
FactCheck.org
Annenberg Public Policy Center
202 S. 36th St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-3806

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=ff9a7620f9&utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=8fa589d71b-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2023_01_25_05_10&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-8fa589d71b-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D)
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=ff9a7620f9&utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=8fa589d71b-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2023_01_25_05_10&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-8fa589d71b-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D)
.

This email was sent to [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
why did I get this? ([link removed]) unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) update subscription preferences ([link removed])
FactCheck.org: A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania . 202 S 36th St. . Philadelphia, Pa 19104 . USA
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis