Your weekly newsletter on money in politics.
View this email in your browser
January 16th, 2020
This week in money-in-politics
 
More money, less transparency:
A decade under Citizens United
 
The Center for Responsive Politics has published a new report, More money, less transparency: A decade under Citizens United, a comprehensive look at the lasting impacts of this profoundly important case. Leveraging over 35 years of experience, this report uses OpenSecrets’ original research, which finds, among other conclusions:
  • Individual millionaires and billionaires, not corporations, emerged as the dominant political giving force. Just 10 donors accounted for more than $1 billion over the decade.
  • Independent groups, which have spent $4.5 billion since the ruling, routinely overshadow political parties and even candidates in crucial races.
  • With corporations, nonprofits and the like able to spend on elections, voters are often being influenced by secretive groups that don’t share information about their funding sources.
Read the report
Share Share
Tweet Tweet
Forward to Friend Forward to Friend

Sanders donors less likely to give to other candidates, but when they do, it’s Warren


Sen. Bernie Sanders has a loyal base of donors who are the least likely to contribute to other Democratic presidential candidates. But when they do stray, Sanders supporters choose Sen. Elizabeth Warren. On the other side, Warren’s donors are much more likely to give to Sanders.
Read More

Will donors to Cory Booker move to other 2020 Democrats?


Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) shares thousands of donors with several presidential candidates, making it difficult to say who might get a fundraising boost from his decision to leave the race. Among the remaining contenders, Booker shares the most donors (23,088) with Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg (17,983).  
Read More

Tom Steyer joins Democratic debate thanks to multi-million dollar ad spending


Billionaire investor and Democratic megadonor Tom Steyer’s massive spending on TV ads in two early primary states boosted his polling numbers and propelled him to Tuesday’s Democratic primary debate stage. Steyer’s increase in the polls in South Carolina and Nevada can be attributed to his aggressive ad campaign in those states. 
 
Read More
A look at Joint Fundraising Committees
 
 
Following moves by Trump Victory —a joint fundraising committee that benefits both the Trump campaign and the RNC — to bring 22 state parties into the fold, it is worth taking a closer look at what, exactly, a Joint Fundraising Committee is. The inclusion of these state parties now allows one donor to write a $580,600 check without violating campaign contributions limits.

JFCs can be created by two or more candidates, PACs or party committees to share the costs of fundraising, and split the proceeds. Participants in the JFC can't take any more money from a donor than they could if the money was given directly, but this vehicle allows a donor to write one very large check. Since the 2014 McCutcheon v. FEC decision which removed overall aggregate giving limits, JFCs can involve a virtually unlimited number of candidates or committees, which can then solicit one donor for one big contribution.


Read more
Have a friend you think would like our money-in-politics newsletter? 
Click here to forward this email! 

OpenSecrets in the News

See where we've been cited by media outlets around the nation this week.  

 

See more here

tryu2.jpg
count-cah-make-change.png Chair-nave.jpg
Copyright © 2020 Center for Responsive Politics, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website, OpenSecrets.org.

Our mailing address is:
Center for Responsive Politics
1300 L Street NW
Suite 200
Washington, District of Columbia xxxxxx

Add us to your address book


unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences