'Sunrise review' would inform legislators about impact of proposed occupational licenses

'Sunrise review' would inform legislators about impact of proposed occupational licenses
Wisconsin should join states that have enacted sunrise laws as an alternative to new licenses that fence out workers and don't protect public

CONTACT: Julie Grace, Badger Institute Policy Analyst, at 330-410-6212 or [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

By JULIE GRACE | January 16, 2020

More than 1 million Wisconsinites today need a state-issued license in order to work in their chosen professions. As policymakers in Madison created dozens and dozens of new occupational licenses in recent years, they often did so without assessing the impact on workers, consumers, the economy or public safety. A new bill in Madison would change that.

Many Wisconsin workers struggle to complete the often costly and time-consuming requirements associated with occupational licenses. Others are discouraged from entering certain fields entirely.

Research shows that occupational licensing leads to fewer jobs ([link removed]) , creates higher prices ([link removed]) for consumers, disproportionately affects low-income households ([link removed]) and hinders worker mobility ([link removed]) . Despite these findings, the number of occupational licenses has increased dramatically ([link removed]) , now affecting nearly 30% of U.S. workers ([link removed]) , up from just 5% in 1950.

The new bill ([link removed]) , described as sunrise legislation, aims to equip legislators with more information on the effects of a proposed license and ensure that occupational licenses are used only for their intended purpose: to protect public safety. The bill would create a substantive review process (a “sunrise review”) for any proposed new licenses in the state.

The process would evaluate a few key factors: whether the unregulated practice of the occupation would harm the public, whether the public can be expected to benefit from a new license, the least restrictive regulation that would protect the public, a comparison of licensure requirements for that occupation in other states and an estimate of the financial burden imposed on individuals or businesses involved in the profession.

Even if some type of regulation is justified, imposing a license — the most-restrictive form of regulation — on a profession is harmful to Wisconsin workers and consumers. The alternatives to an occupational license ([link removed]) included in this bill still would protect consumers without establishing high barriers to entry into a field.

Other states have implemented similar laws with success. A 2015 report ([link removed]) from the Obama administration points to sunrise reviews as an effective framework for occupational licensing reform. It highlights states such as Florida, which restricts licensing to instances when “the overall cost-effectiveness and economic impact of the proposed regulation … will be favorable” and “other types of less restrictive regulation would not effectively protect the public.”

States such as Arizona, Maine, Minnesota and Nebraska all have passed sunrise reviews. Colorado established a sunrise review in 1985. By 2005, 109 proposals for new occupational regulations had been submitted. Licensing was recommended in 12 instances, and the legislature ultimately created a new regulation in only 19 instances ([link removed]) .

Occupational licensing should not be viewed as a binary decision (to license or not to license). There are other entirely appropriate consumer protection options that should be considered. A sunrise review can equip legislators with the necessary information to make these important decisions on behalf of Wisconsin workers and consumers.

Julie Grace is a Badger Institute policy analyst.

Permission to reprint is granted as long as the authors and the Badger Institute are properly cited.

###

============================================================
We believe competitive free markets, limited government, private initiative and personal responsibility are essential to our democratic way of life. The Badger Institute is a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization and does not receive government funding. Our work is funded solely through tax-deductible gifts from foundations, companies and individuals. We appreciate your support.
** Contribute ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2020 Badger Institute, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
Badger Institute
700 W. Virginia St., Suite 301
Milwaukee, Wi 53204
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.