The University of
Delaware seems to be in full cover-up mode for President Biden. Here’s
the latest.
Our legal team filed
an appeal brief with
the Delaware Supreme Court, on behalf of Judicial Watch and the Daily
Caller News Foundation (DCNF), asking it to overturn a lower court’s
decision blocking the release of the U.S. Senate records of President Joe
Biden housed at the University of Delaware.
Biden’s papers include more than 1,850 boxes of archival records from his
36-year Senate career.
In July 2020 we and the DCNF
filed a Delaware FOIA
lawsuit after the university denied our April 2020 requests for all of
Biden’s Senate records and for records about the preservation and any
proposed release of the records, including communications with Biden or his
representatives (
Judicial Watch, Inc. v.
University of Delaware, No. N20A-07-001 MMJ (Del.
Super.)).
In our
appeal brief we ask
the court to review a Superior Court opinion issued in October 2022 that
found the university had met its burden of performing an adequate search
for the requested records. The opinion came after the university had
submitted a second affidavit from the university’s FOIA official stating
that no state funds had been spent on maintaining the documents.
We argue:
The Opinion should be reversed. The Supplemented Affidavit is nothing
more than a document filled with stale hearsay and vague [assertions
without proof] which at best shows that the University did not engage in a
diligent effort, as required by law, to review Appellants’ Requests.
Appellants identified the deficiencies and asked to vet the assertions
themselves. The Superior Court, however, simply granted the University
“do overs.” Even after multiple attempts, the University has still not
carried its burden to prove that the requested records are not subject to
FOIA.
***
Despite two attempts on remand, the University still has not satisfied
its burden to create a record from which the Superior Court can determine
whether the University performed an adequate search for responsive
documents.
We are asking the Supreme Court to overturn the lower court’s ruling and
allow us limited discovery “to include at [a] minimum, a deposition of a
representative of the University and production of documents …
Alternatively, the Court should remand this case with instructions to order
the turnover of the requested documents since the University has had more
than adequate opportunity to satisfy its burden.”
The University of Delaware has been sitting on Biden’s Senate records for
more than 10 years and is desperate to avoid any scrutiny of its secret
deal with Biden to hide these records. The latest revelations about
Biden’s handling of ‘classified’ records raise even more questions
about what Biden is hiding.
“On day one, the White House said President Biden was committed to
bringing ‘transparency and truth back to government.’ Apparently, the
University of Delaware didn’t get the memo,” Daily Caller News
Foundation Managing Editor Michael Bastasch. “It’s shocking they’ve
spent years fighting to keep these records hidden from the American people.
Hopefully, the Delaware Supreme Court ends the University’s
stonewalling.”
Judicial Watch Sues Pentagon Records About Key Medical Database
The Defense Department seems to have something to hide about a key database
that could provide insight on issues related to the COVID-19 vaccines.
Undeterred, we sued the U.S. Department of Defense for records and
communications relating to the data contained in the Defense Medical
Epidemiology Database (
Judicial Watch, Inc. v.
U.S. Department of Defense (No. 1:22-cv-03043)).
The
Armed Forces Health
Surveillance Branch’s Defense Medical
Epidemiology Database is a web-based tool designed to provide access
to:
[A] subset of data contained within the
Defense Medical
Surveillance System (DMSS). DMSS contains up-to-date and historical
data on diseases and medical events (e.g., hospitalizations, ambulatory
visits, reportable diseases, etc.) … The DMED application provides a
user-friendly interface to perform queries regarding disease and injury
rates and relative burdens of disease in active component
populations.
The purpose of DMED is to standardize the epidemiologic methodology used to
collect, integrate and analyze active component service member personnel
and medical event data…
In February 2021, the ranking member of the U.S. Senate Permanent
Subcommittee on Investigations, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), sent a
letter to Department
of Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin highlighting reports from three
whistleblowers about injuries to servicemen and women potentially related
to the COVID-19 vaccines:
Based on data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED),
Thomas Renz, an attorney who is representing three Department of Defense
whistleblowers, reported that these whistleblowers found a significant
increase in registered diagnoses on DMED for miscarriages, cancer, and many
other medical conditions in 2021 compared to a five-year average from
2016-2020. For example, at the roundtable Renz stated that registered
diagnoses for neurological issues increased 10 times from a five-year
average of 82,000 to 863,000 in 2021.
We sued after the Office of the Secretary of Defense failed to respond to
our February 16, 2022, FOIA request for:
- All emails sent to and from Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin (on his
official government/military email accounts or non-government email
account, in his own name or using an alias) relating to the Defense Medical
Epidemiology Database, DMED, Sen. Ron Johnson, and/or vaccines.
- All emails sent to and from Deputy Secretary of Defense Katheen H.
Hicks (on her official government/military email accounts or non-government
email accounts, in her own name or using an alias) relating to the Defense
Medical Epidemiology Database, DMED, Sen. Ron Johnson, and/or
vaccines.
- All emails sent to and from Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen.
Mark Milley (on his official government/military email accounts or
non-government email accounts, in his own name or using an alias) relating
to the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database, DMED, Sen. Ron Johnson,
and/or vaccines.
- All emails sent to and from Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Gen. John Hyten (on his official government/military email accounts or
non-government email accounts, in his own name or using an alias) relating
to the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database, DMED, Sen. Ron Johnson,
and/or vaccines.
- All emails sent to and from Defense Department Public Affairs Officer
Major Charlie Dietz (on his official government/military email accounts or
non-government email accounts, in his own name or using an alias) relating
to the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database, DMED, Sen. Ron Johnson,
and/or vaccines.
- All reports, memoranda, studies, analyses, directive, and electronic
communications produced by or sent to and from officials who maintain the
Defense Medical Epidemiology Data base relating to the accuracy of or
changes to be made to data contained in the Defense Medical Epidemiology
Data base.
The data from Defense Medical Epidemiology Database showing “skyrocketing
levels of disease among military personnel,” also were publicized through
an
image shared on
Facebook:
Percentage Increase Over the Average of the
Last Five Years: Heart attacks 269%, Cancer 300%, Pericarditis 175%,
Myocarditis 285%, Pulmonary Embolisms 467%, Cerebral Infarction 393%,
Bell’s Palsy 319%, Guillain-Barre 250%, Immunodeficiencies 275%,
Menstrual Irregularity 476%, Multiple Sclerosis 487%, Miscarriage 306%, HIV
590%, Chest Pain 1,529%, Labored Breathing 905%, Neurological Issues
1052%.
Responding to these concerns, an unnamed Defense Department source told
Reuters:
The calculations, based on figures from the
Defense Medical Epidemiology Database, are incorrect. Last year’s
apparent sharp increases were caused by underreporting for the years
2016-2020. A spokesperson for the Department of Defense told Reuters that
due to “data corruption,” the platform showed only a “fraction” of
the actual medical diagnoses registered in that period.
The covid vaccines were until recently mandated by the Pentagon, so the
cover-up of information that could reflect on the vaccines’ safety is
particularly outrageous.
Judicial Watch Sues for NIH Communications on Fetal Organ
Harvesting
On April 16, 2021, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) sent out a
notice informing the
extramural research community (researchers outside NIH from across the
United States and in some foreign countries who have been awarded grants
through the NIH grant program) that the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) was reversing the Trump Administration’s
limits on fetal tissue
research.
The notice stated: “All research applications for NIH grants and
contracts proposing the use of human fetal tissue from elective abortions
will be reviewed by an Ethics Advisory Board.” Accordingly, the notice
said, “HHS/NIH will not convene another NIH Human Fetal Tissue Research
Ethics Advisory Board.”
We have already established collusion between the University of Pittsburgh
and the NIH over the fetal organ ‘chop shop’ in the University of
Pittsburgh paid for with federal tax dollars. The Biden administration
turned the spigot back on for taxpayer funding of this barbarism, and we
want the details.
So we filed a FOIA lawsuit against the HHS for records of communications of
the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) Office of Extramural Research
about the use of human fetal organs (
Judicial Watch, Inc. v.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (No.
1:22-cv-03051)).
We sued after HHS failed respond to a July 15, 2022, FOIA request to the
National Institutes for Health (a component of HHS) for:
All communications concerning human fetal tissue between the Office of
Extramural Research and any of the following entities: (1) University of
Pittsburgh (Pitt), (2) University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, (3) the
National Abortion Federation and (4) any Planned Parenthood entity.
In February 2020, NIH
records showed that
the agency paid thousands of dollars to a California-based firm to purchase
organs from aborted human fetuses to create “
humanized mice” for
HIV research.
In June 2020, FDA
records showed that
between 2012 and 2018 the FDA entered into eight contracts worth $96,370
with Advanced Bioscience Resources (ABR) to acquire “fresh and never
frozen” tissue from 1
st and 2
nd trimester aborted
fetuses for use in creating “humanized mice” for ongoing research.
In April 2021, FDA records detailed the agency spent
tens of thousands of
taxpayer dollars to buy human fetal tissue from California-based Advanced
Bioscience Resources (ABR). The tissue was used in creating “humanized
mice” to test “biologic drug products,” and wanted “fresh; shipped
on wet ice” fetal organs.
In August 2021, Judicial Watch and the Center for Medical Progress through
a
separate FOIA lawsuit
uncovered HHS documents that revealed nearly $3 million in federal funds
were spent on the University of Pittsburgh’s quest to become a “Tissue
Hub” for human fetal tissue ranging from 6 to 42 weeks gestation.
In September 2021, we uncovered
records and
communications from the FDA involving “
humanized mice”
research with human fetal heads, organs and tissue, including
communications and contracts with human fetal tissue provider Advanced
Bioscience Resources (ABR). Most of the records are communications and
related attachments between
Perrin Larton, a
procurement manager for ABR, and research veterinary medical officer
Dr. Kristina Howard of
the FDA.
In April 2022, we uncovered records revealing that the Associate Senior
Vice Chancellor for Science Strategy and Planning in the Health Sciences at
the University of Pittsburgh, Dr. Jeremy Berg, contacted then-Director of
the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Francis Collins,
requesting help to
combat, “efforts to undermine important science using fetal tissue.”
Additionally, the records included a scientific report containing
information about grafting human scalp and other tissues onto mice.
$4.5 Million for Culturally Appropriate Program to Help Asians Quit
Smoking
Here’s another corrosive way bureaucrats have decided to spend your
hard-earned tax dollars, as
reported by our
Corruption Chronicles blog.
The U.S. government is dedicating $4.5 million to enhance a
“linguistically and culturally appropriate” program to help Asians quit
smoking. It is known as the national Asian language quitline and provides
cessation counseling, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and in-language
materials for tobacco users who speak Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese
(CKV). The cash will flow through a Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
offshoot called Office on Smoking and Health. With an annual budget of nearly $10 billion,
the CDC is the federal agency responsible for protecting public health. It
operates under the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and claims
to work around the clock to protect America from health, safety, and
security threats whether diseases start at home or abroad.
In its grant announcement the agency writes that telephone-based quitlines
increase quit rates among individuals who use commercial tobacco and are
trying to stop. They are also effective in reaching and supporting diverse
and low-income populations, according to the CDC. “Limited capacity to
provide linguistically and culturally appropriate quitline services may
create barriers that contribute to tobacco-related disparities, especially
among various subgroups of Asians that speak Chinese (including Cantonese
and Mandarin), Korean, and Vietnamese languages (CKV),” the agency writes
in the recently published Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO), adding that
less than half of Asians of CKV descent in the United States report
speaking English “very well."
That poses a public health challenge, the
CDC claims, because limited English proficiency reduces access to
evidence-based health services. “Since many CKV speakers in the United
States come from countries with very high smoking rates among men (up to
50%), providing culturally and linguistically appropriate care is a step
towards equitable and effective care,” according to the agency. The
millions of American taxpayer dollars will go to one lucky organization
that will “operate and promote a linguistically and culturally
appropriate nationwide quitline service for individuals who use commercial
tobacco products and who predominantly speak CKV languages,” the CDC
reveals. The agency explains that it is more efficient to provide a
national Asian language quitline rather than rely on states to provide the
services.
It is not clear how the agency came to that
conclusion considering that a national government-funded Asian Smokers’
Quitline (ASQ) that has served CKV-speaking populations since 2012 has
enrolled just 19,000 callers in more than a decade. That information is
embedded deep in the grant announcement which is more than 50 pages and
states that the CDC will provide continued support for a national Asian
language quitline. With the new multi-million-dollar allocation the agency
expects better outcomes such as increased use and reach of evidence-based
and culturally appropriate quit support services among CKV-speaking people.
That includes counseling, medications approved by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), and digital technologies. The agency also expects
“increased successful cessation at greater than 6 months among
CKV-speaking people who use commercial tobacco,” according to the grant
document.
Tobacco-related disparities are created by a
complex mix of factors including social determinants of health, tobacco
industry influence and environmental conditions, the CDC writes. Social
determinants of health are the conditions in the environments where people
are born, live, learn, work, play, worship, and age that affect a wide
range of health, functioning, and quality-of-life outcomes and risks. The
disparities can affect populations based on factors such as race,
ethnicity, sexual orientation and gender identity, income, and employment
status.
In the last few years, the government has
spent vast amounts of taxpayer dollars to provide culturally and
linguistically appropriate services to a variety of groups. Recent examples
include $66.5 million to strengthen COVID-19 vaccine confidence among
racial and ethnic minority groups by providing culturally appropriate
information, education and outreach involving the shots. Uncle Sam also
recently spent $125 million to provide illegal immigrant minors, known as
Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC), with a multitude of services in the
private sector including medical care, special housing arrangements for
delinquent, pregnant and gang-affiliated teens as well as long-term
counseling. The services were guaranteed by the government to be
“culturally and linguistically-appropriate to the unique need of each
individual.”
Judicial Watch’s Guide to Congressional Investigations
Can we expect any serious investigation of Biden administration wrongdoing
now that the Republicans control the House of Representatives? Micah
Morrison, our chief investigative reporter, provides a
rundown in
I
nvestigative Bulletin of the House’s investigative agenda:
The new House of Representatives was sworn in early Saturday morning after
Kevin McCarthy was elected Speaker on the fifteenth ballot. The House GOP
leadership promises an ambitious agenda of investigations, including
a special committee on the
weaponization of federal agencies, but history is not reassuring. Will
the House probes bring real progress—important new information, defunding
of bad actors, sunlight on wrongdoing, indictment referrals, impeachment if
warranted—or two years of fruitless bickering over documents and
testimony?
At Judicial Watch,
we run our own
investigations and have been holding government officials, Democrat and
Republican, accountable for nearly three decades, but we’ll be closely
watching the House probes. Republican staff on the House Judiciary
Committee earlier released a “road map” to the new investigative
agenda, and over at the Senate, ranking Judiciary Committee member Charles
Grassley has been digging deep into FBI corruption, releasing letters
outlining serious allegations of wrongdoing. We’ve reviewed all the
documents and talked to our sources. Here’s our guide to the new
Congressional investigations.
Who Is Jack Smith?
No case is likely to dominate the 2023 headlines more than the
investigation of former president Donald Trump by new special counsel Jack
Smith. Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Smith, a career federal
prosecutor, to lead a probe into Trump’s conduct surrounding the events
of January 6, 2021, as well as a separate probe of the storage of
presidential documents at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate. Trump has denied
wrongdoing in both cases. Notably, any decision to indict rests with the
attorney general, not the special counsel.
The Trump affair screams for Congressional oversight—and apparently will
get it. Even before the appointment of Smith, the House investigative road
map signaled concerns about an “unprecedented raid on a former
president’s home” to seize documents. The roadmap noted that Trump had
cooperated with government officials seeking documents before the raid;
that “the Biden Justice Department has provided limited justification for
this unprecedented action;” and that Justice and the FBI “have failed
to sufficiently comply” with Congressional requests for documents related
to the raid. Congress will want to take a look as well at the belated
disclosure of
classified documents
found at a Joe Biden office in the days before the 2022 midterm
elections.
Smith’s unusual career—a path that took
him from the office of the Manhattan District Attorney to federal postings
in Brooklyn, Washington, Tennessee, and the Hague—is also worth a closer
look. From 2010 to 2015, he headed the Justice Department’s Public
Integrity Section and was at the center of several controversial issues.
Among them: the IRS scandal.
In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation
revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Smith’s
Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal investigations
into conservative tax-exempt groups. Government officials were looking to
step up a probe into requests for tax-exemption from organizations with
conservative sounding names like “Tea Party” and other “political
sounding names,” according to a later report by the Treasury
Department’s inspector general. Smith appears to have been a key player
in this attempt to silence conservative voices.
According to the documents obtained by
Judicial Watch, Smith directed the head of the Justice Department’s
Election Crimes Branch, Richard Pilger, to meet with the director of the
IRS’s Tax-Exempt Organizations division, Lois Lerner. In one email
obtained by Judicial Watch, Lerner discusses an idea that the Justice
Department could build “false-statement cases” against tax-exempt
conservative groups.
Judicial Watch later obtained additional
documents detailing a planning meeting between Justice Department, FBI and
IRS officials about possible criminal prosecutions. Thanks to Judicial
Watch disclosures, House investigators discovered that the IRS improperly
turned over confidential tax records of non-profit organizations to the
FBI—sparking a public uproar and forcing the return of the records to the
IRS. Read more about the case here and here.
Biden Family Corruption
The other headline-grabbing case in the
House roadmap are allegations of corruption involving President Biden’s
son, Hunter, and other family members—possibly even the president
himself. The House report puts aside the sensational aspects of the Hunter
Biden saga—the crack cocaine use, the heavy drinking and hookers, the
controversy over a suddenly surfaced laptop computer, a gun, a seemingly
endless parade of incriminating, embarrassing, or outright disgusting
personal photographs from the laptop—and focuses on the sober
case.
“Mounting evidence from the last two years,” the House roadmap notes,
“shows that Hunter Biden, son of President Biden, has received
preferential treatment from federal law enforcement, who seem to have
turned a blind eye to potential national security threats presented by his
business dealings with Chinese, Russian, and other foreign
nationals.”
The roadmap notes the September 2020 release of an investigative report by
Senator Chuck Grassley. That report noted “potential criminal activity
relating to transactions among and between Hunter Biden, his family, and
his associates with Ukrainian, Russian, Kazakh, and Chinese nationals.”
One Hunter Biden business associate charges that Joe Biden was slated for a
payoff in 2017. Congress will want to hear from the Biden business partner
alleging a payoff of the president and take a close look at the
evidence.
The Grassley letters
outline an apparent campaign of stonewalling and coverup by the FBI and
others in response to Congressional inquiries in the Hunter Biden case. The
letters, cited at length in the House roadmap, also note the role of
several senior FBI officials and Richard Pilger—the Justice Department
Election Crimes Branch chief involved in the earlier IRS scandal—in
opening investigations into “the Trump campaign and individuals linked to
the 2020 elections.” FBI whistleblowers told Grassley that there was a
“double standard” in opening investigations that appeared “to benefit
the political aims and objectives of a select few Justice Department and
FBI officials.”
Those are serious charges. Congressional investigators will have to steer
around numerous roadblocks, including a criminal inquiry into Hunter Biden
by U.S. Attorney David Weiss, the top federal prosecutor in Delaware. Fox
News has
reported that Attorney
General Garland—Weiss’s boss—has taken a “hands-off approach” to
the Hunter Biden case and is “leaving charging decisions up to Weiss,”
a Trump appointee. But Congress may want a look at the Garland connection
as well.
FBI Corruption: Faking a Rise in Domestic Violent Extremism?
The House roadmap reports that whistleblowers have come forward with claims
that “the FBI is manipulating data about domestic violent extremism to
support the Biden Administration’s political agenda.” According to the
roadmap, the FBI “is pressuring agents to reclassify cases as domestic
violent extremism (DVE)” and allegedly “manufacturing DVE cases where
they may not otherwise exist and even manipulating its case categorization
system to feign a national problem.”
That’s a grave charge. The issue traces back to the events of January 6,
2021, Congressional investigators say. According to the roadmap,
whistleblowers have come forward “with information about how the FBI
manipulated the manner in which it categorized January 6-related
investigations to create a misleading narrative that domestic terrorism is
organically surging around the country.”
According to FBI whistleblowers, FBI field offices around the country have
been directed by the powerful FBI Washington Field Office to open cases
against individuals who were at Capitol on January 6. But no work is
actually done in the field, according to the whistleblowers. Rather, the
entire January 6 investigation is run from the Washington office.
The upshot? Notes the roadmap: the “FBI’s case categorization creates
the illusion that FBI field offices around the country are investigating a
groundswell of domestic terrorism cases, giving the impression that
[domestic violent extremism, or DVE] is present in jurisdictions across the
nation. In reality, however, the cases all stem from the same related
investigation concerning the actions at the Capitol on January 6. Such an
artificial case categorization scheme allows FBI leadership to misleadingly
point to ‘significant’ increases in DVE nationwide.”
FBI Corruption: Targeting School Boards & Parents
In October, as controversy about Covid masking and the influence of
hard-left Critical Race Theory in education rippled through school board
meetings across the country, Attorney General Garland issued a memorandum
directing the Justice Department and FBI to target local school boards and
parents. The FBI would address a purported “disturbing spike in
harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence” against school
boards.
Following a national outcry about Justice Department overreach, Garland
publicly
backpedaled,
but did not rescind or disavow the memorandum. In fact, the FBI quickly
doubled down. The House road map notes that soon after the Garland
memorandum, the FBI established “a new ‘threat tag’ created to apply
to school board investigations.” The new “EDUOFFICIALS” threat tag,
officials directed, was to be applied to all “investigations and
assessments of threats specifically against school board administrators,
board members, teachers, and staff,” according to an email obtained by
House investigative staff.
Critics charge that the Justice and the FBI has gone too far, chilling
legitimate dissent over issues such as Covid masks and Critical Race
Theory. Imagine speaking up at your local school board meeting and getting
a visit from the FBI. The roadmap claims that “information from
whistleblowers show that the FBI has opened investigations with the
EDUOFFICIALS threat tag in almost every region of the country and relating
to all types of educational settings.”
Big Brother, Big Tech
House leaders are also calling for close looks at the FBI’s relationship
with Big Tech powerhouses like Facebook and Twitter. The House roadmap says
evidence “shows that the FBI is helping censor conservative viewpoints”
on Big Tech platforms. Whistleblower information provided to House
investigators “suggests that the FBI and Facebook have a so-called
‘special relationship’ that may threaten constitutional protections and
lead to partisan efforts.” Whistleblower allegations suggest that the
special FBI relationship includes “Facebook voluntarily sending
information that may relate to citizens’ private political
speech.”
Elon Musk’s recent
“Twitter Files”
disclosures have increased pressure for congressional scrutiny of the
relationship between government entities and Big Tech. The Twitter
disclosures outlined apparent government interference with free speech,
suppression of conservative voices, improper banning of then-President
Trump from the platform, and censorship of New York Post reporting on the
Hunter Biden scandal. Incoming House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim
Jordan told the Wall Street Journal that the Twitter Files showed the
“collusion between big government, big tech and big media” was “worse
than we thought.” Jordan and incoming House Oversight Committee Chairman
James Comer are expected to launch hearings exploring the Twitter Files
revelations.
The Border Crisis
It’s not in the road map, but the other House investigations worth noting
are upcoming probes into the crisis on the southern border. House leaders
have said they will
support investigations
by the House Judiciary and House Oversight committees into border issues,
including a possible impeachment inquiry into Homeland Security Secretary
Alejandro Mayorkas.
The southern border is under tremendous strain. More than two million
illegal immigrants were arrested in border crossings in 2022 up to October,
a record number—and that’s just the ones that got caught. More than 800
died making the dangerous crossing in the same time period. Mexican drug
cartels pound the border in an unceasing drug war. The latest cartel
gambit?
A plague of fentanyl
on both sides of the border.
House investigators want to hear from Mayorkas and other top Homeland
Security officials on a wide range of issues, including the unprecedented
surge of illegal aliens, the failure of border policing and border security
technology, the impact of President Trump’s wall and other Trump-era
policies, the influence of drug cartels and drug smuggling, and the entry
into the U.S. of violent criminals and terrorists.
We’ll have more on the House investigations in the coming months. And the
independent Judicial Watch investigations will continue. Stay tuned.
Until next week,