[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fthe-coming-end-of-title-42 Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fthe-coming-end-of-title-42)
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
The Coming End of Title 42 ([link removed])
Follow Parsing Immigration Policy on Ricochet ([link removed]) , Apple Podcasts ([link removed]) , Amazon Music ([link removed]) , Spotify ([link removed]) , Stitcher ([link removed]) , Google Podcasts ([link removed]) or use the podcast's RSS Feed ([link removed])
Washington, D.C. (January 12, 2023) –There’s an immigration crisis at the U.S. southern border, but that border could be all but erased if Title 42 were to end without the administration implementing equally effective enforcement policies.

Title 42 is the public-health order that directs the Border Patrol to expel border-jumpers without a hearing. Whether the U.S. can continue to rely on this public-health order to deal with the immigration crisis remains a question for the courts. In response to an application filed by a coalition of states, the Supreme Court has ordered that Title 42 stay in place until the Court considers whether those states should be allowed to appeal an order terminating Title 42.

On this week’s episode of Parsing Immigration Policy ([link removed]) , Andrew Arthur, the Center’s Fellow in Law and Policy, and Senior Legal Fellow George Fishman provide an overview and a comprehensive timeline of Title 42’s circuitous legal route, with predictions on the future of those public health orders and the corresponding effect they have had on the border.

Mark Krikorian, the Center’s Executive Director and host of the podcast, highlights how the Biden administration has used the public health order to maintain some modicum of operational control at the border, “and when it goes away, they’re going to have to face, and the public is going to have to face, the fact that this administration refuses to enforce the border.”

Fishman warns that, “until the immigration laws are fixed, in reality, unless it’s the mass use of Remain in Mexico, Title 42 is the silver bullet.”

In his closing commentary, Krikorian offers some thoughts on President Biden's recent visit to El Paso and his recently announced immigration border plan. The new policy includes both "stick" and "carrot" approaches, neither of which are likely to stem the tide of migrants crossing the Southwest border.
Visit Website ([link removed])
Donate ([link removed])
Related Articles:

SCOTUS Keeps Title 42 Going — For Now ([link removed])

Is Covid-19 Still a Problem, or Not? ([link removed])

The States Want to Stage an Intervention for Biden’s Troubled Borders, and the Supreme Court Seems Eager to Oblige ([link removed])

CBP, Texas, and El Paso Brace for the End of Title 42 ([link removed])

If You Like Title 42, You’ll Love Section 212(f) ([link removed])

Biden Visits ‘Potemkin Village’ Version of El Paso ([link removed])

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** [link removed] ([link removed])
** Google Plus ([link removed])
** LinkedIn ([link removed])
** RSS ([link removed])
Copyright © 2023 Center for Immigration Studies, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
Center for Immigration Studies
1629 K St., NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20006
USA

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.

** View this e-mail in your browser. ([link removed])

This is the Center for Immigration Studies CISNews e-mail list.