United Poultry Concerns - [link removed]
14 January 2020

John Sanbonmatsu: "Why 'fake' meat isn't,"
St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Jan 13, 2020

"Only in recent decades have we come to associate the word 'meat' exclusively
with the flesh of animals. The word derives from the Old English mete, for food,
nourishment or sustenance."


Please read and share widely: Why 'fake' meat isn't
By John Sanbonmatsu, PhD
[link removed]


Is it fraud to sell "veggie burgers," "chickenless nuggets" or "tofu dogs"? What
about to call a beverage made from soy beans "soy milk"?

According to the meat and dairy lobbies, it is. Alarmed by declining sales of
dairy and beef and by growing interest in veganism, agribusiness has been
pushing legislation to outlaw the use of "meaty" and "milky" words in the
marketing of plant-based foods. Last year, Missouri enacted a "real meat" law,
making it illegal to sell plant-based products using meat-like words. Louisiana
and Mississippi passed virtually identical bills last summer, and similar
legislation is pending in half of the nation's states.

Backers of the new bills claim that referring to plant-based foods as "meat" or
"milk" is unprecedented, and therefore deceptive. However, it is they who are
deceiving the public - by ignoring a thousand years of past English usage.

Only in recent decades, in fact, have we come to associate the word "meat"
exclusively with the flesh of animals. The word derives from the Old English
mete, for food, nourishment or sustenance. As late as the 1970s, the Oxford
English Dictionary still gave the primary definition of meat as "food in
general: anything used as nourishment for man or animals; usually solid food, in
contradistinction to drink." Meat was therefore synonymous with "meal, repast,
or feast."

Once common, now archaic terms listed in that dictionary include "meat-giver"
(one who provides food), "meat-while" ("the time of taking food, meal-time"),
and even "meat-lust" (signifying not an erotic attachment to bacon, but merely
"an appetite for food"). Even "meatless" (a word we now associate only with
vegetarianism) for centuries merely meant to be "without food."

Potatoes, too, were considered meat, as were "crumbled bread and oatmeal." A
child sent to "collect meat for the cattle" would have been asked to gather
provender, not carcasses. "Green-meat," as it was termed, referred to any "grass
or green vegetables used for food or fodder," whether consumed by humans or
domesticated animals. Similar usages of plant meat remained common into the
early 20th century.

"Meat" has also long been used in its more restrictive sense, to refer to animal
flesh. But again, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, it was more common
for "meat" to refer to "the edible parts of fruit, nuts, eggs, etc.; the pulp,
kernel, yoke, and white, etc., in contradistinction to the rind, peel, or
shell." Hence the still common expression, "getting to the meat of the matter."

Why this broader usage? Because for most of human existence, flesh has played
only a supporting role in the human diet. Vegetables, fruits, grains, nuts and
legumes have oftentimes provided the bulk of our nourishment. It was bread that
our ancestors called "the staff of life," not chicken or pork.

A similar falsification of the history of English usage is now occurring too
with "fake milk" bills. In April, the Louisiana Legislature, under urging by the
Louisiana Cattlemen's Association, passed a bill making it illegal to sell as
"milk" anything that doesn't come from a "hooved mammal."

The Food and Drug Association proposes that milk be defined as the "lacteal
secretion ... obtained by the complete milking of one or more healthy cows."
Chris Galen, vice president of the National Milk Producers Federation, has
similarly stated: "You don't got milk if it comes from a nut or a seed or a
grain or a weed."

In fact, referring to the secretions of nuts, seeds and grains as "milk" has
been common since at least the 15th century. The Oxford English Dictionary cites
"the milk of cocoa nuts," the milk of figs, and the "milks of wild-poppies,
garden-poppies, dandelions, hawk-weed, and sow-thistle." "Milk" need not even
refer to a foodstuff. At your local pharmacy you'll still find a suspension of
magnesium hydroxide used for upset stomachs, called Phillip's Milk of Magnesia.
(And where would we be without "the milk of human kindness"?)

If we have forgotten these once-common usages, it is only because the animal
industry wants us to believe that only foods derived from animals can be truly
nourishing. Amid growing public awareness of the ecological and ethical problems
associated with raising and killing billions of animals for food, the industry
now hopes to obliterate the last cultural traces of these earlier meanings,
wiping clean our collective memory. But we should be allowed to have our plant
meats and milks - and eat and drink them, too.

John Sanbonmatu is associate professor of philosophy at Worcester Polytechnic
Institute. He is curator of the CleanMeat-Hoax.com website.



--
United Poultry Concerns is a nonprofit organization that promotes
the compassionate and respectful treatment of domestic fowl.
Don't just switch from beef to chicken. Go Vegan.
[link removed] [link removed]
[link removed]

View this article online
[link removed]

Forward email
[link removed]





This email was sent to [email protected] by [email protected].

Update Profile/Email Address
[link removed]


Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe(TM)
[link removed]


Privacy Policy:
[link removed]





Online Marketing by
Constant Contact(R)
www.constantcontact.com



United Poultry Concerns | PO Box 150 | Machipongo | VA | 23405